Post on 03-Jun-2018
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
1/124
QuickTime and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS 2007
Criminal LawSUMMER REVIEWER
Advisers:Atty. Lorenzo Padilla, Justice Diosdado Peralta; Head: Kristine Quimpo; Understudies: Ivy Patdu, KriznaGomez
BOOK I
CRIMINAL LAW A branch of municipal law whichdefines crimes, treats of their natureand provides fortheir punishment.
Characteristics of Criminal Law:1. General binding on all persons who reside
or sojourn in the PhilippinesExceptions:
a. Treaty Stipulationb. Laws of Preferential Applicationc. Principles of Public International Law
Ex:i. sovereigns and other chiefs of
stateii. Ambassadors, ministers
plenipotentiary, minister residentand charges daffaires
(BUT consuls, vice-consuls and otherforeign commercial representativesCANNOT claim the privileges andimmunities accorded to ambassadors and
ministers.)
2. Territorial penal laws of the Philippines areenforceable only within its territory
Exceptions: (Art. 2 of RPC bindingeven on crimes committed outside thePhilippines)a. offense committed while on a
Philippine ship or airshipb. forging or counterfeiting any coin or
currency note of the Philippines orobligations and the securities issuedby the Government
c. introduction into the country of theabove-mentioned obligations andsecurities
d. while being public officers andemployees, an offense committed inthe exercise of their functions
e. crimes against national security andthe law of the nations defined in TitleOne of Book Two
3. Prospective the law does not have any
retroactive effect.Exception: when the law is favorable to theaccused
Exceptions to the Exception: a. The new law is expressly made
inapplicable to pending actionsor existing causes of action
b. Offender is a habitual criminal
Theories of Criminal Law:1. Classical Theory basis is mans free will to
choose between good and evil, that is whymore stress is placed upon the result of thefelonious act than upon the criminal himself.The purpose of penalty is retribution. The
RPC is generally governed by this theory.
2. Positivist Theory basis is the sum ofsocial and economic phenomena whichconditions man to do wrong in spite of orcontrary to his volition. This is exemplified inthe provisions on impossible crimes andhabitual delinquency.
3. Mixed Theory combination of the classicaland positivist theories wherein crimes thatare economic and social in nature should bedealt in a positive manner. The law is thus
more compassionate.
Construction of Penal Laws:1. Liberally construed in favor of offender
Ex:a. the offender must clearly fall within
the terms of the lawb. an act is criminal only when made so
by the statute2. In cases of conflict with official translation,
original Spanish text is controlling,3. No interpretation by analogy.
LIMITATIONS ON POWER OF CONGRESS TOENACT PENAL LAWS:
1. ex post facto law2. bill of attainder3. law that violates the equal protection clause
of the constitution4. law which imposes cruel and unusual
punishments nor excessive fines
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
2/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 2 of 174
BOOK ONEGENERAL PROVISIONS
RPC took effect February 1, 1932.
RULES:1. Philippine vessel or airship Philippine
law shall apply to offenses committed invessels registered with the Philippine Bureauof Customs. It is the registration, not thecitizenship of the owner which matters.
2. Foreign vessela. French RuleGeneral Rule: Crimes committed aboarda foreign vessel within the territorialwaters of a country are NOT triable in thecourts of such country.
Exception: commission affects thepeace and security of the territory, orthe safety of the state is endangered.
b. English RuleGeneral Rule: Crimes committed aboarda foreign vessel within the territorialwaters of a country are triable in thecourts of such country.
Exception: When the crime merelyaffects things within the vessel or itrefers to the internal managementthereof.
*This is applicable in the Philippines.
Title One: FELONIES AND CIRCUMSTANCES
WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Chapter One: FELONIES
Felonies acts and omissions punishable by theRevised Penal Code
Crime acts and omissions punishable by any law
Act an overt or external act
Omission failure to perform a duty required by law
ELEMENTS:
1. there must be an act or omission2. this must be punishable by the RPC3. act or omission was done by means of dolo
or culpa
NULLUM CRIMEN, NULLA POENA SINE LEGE There is no crime when there is no law punishing it.
Classification Of Felonies According To TheMeans By Which They Are Committed:
1. Intentional Felonies- by means of deceit(dolo)
Requisites :a. freedomb. intelligencec. intent.
MISTAKE OF FACT misapprehension offact on the part of the person who causedinjury to another. He is not criminally liable.
Requisites:a. the act done would have been lawful
had the facts been as the accusedbelieved them to be
bintention is lawfulb. mistake must be without fault or
carelessness by the accused
2. Culpable Felonies- by means of fault (culpa)Requisites:
a. freedomb. intelligencec. negligence (lack of foresight) and
imprudence (lack of skill)
MALA IN SE v. MALA PROHIBITA
Mala in se Mala Prohibita
moral trait of
offender
considered not considered
good faith as adefense
valid defense,unless the crime isthe result of culpa
not a defense;intent notnecessary-sufficient that theoffender has theintent to perpetratethe act prohibitedby the special law
ART.1: TIME WHEN ACT TAKES EFFECT
ART. 2: APPLICATION OF ITS PROVISIONS
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
3/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 3 of 174
degree ofaccomplishment of the crime
taken into account taken into accountonly whenconsummated
mitigating andaggravating
circumstance
taken into accountin imposing penalty
GENERALLY nottaken into account
degree ofparticipation
when there is morethan one offender,it is taken intoconsideration
GENERALLY nottaken into account
laws violated General Rule:RPC
General Rule:Special PenalLaws
INTENT v. MOTIVE
Intent Motive
purpose to use a
particular means to effecta result
moving power which impels
one to act
element of crime except
in crimes committed with
culpa
not an element
essential in intentional
felonies
essential only when the identity
of the felon is in doubt
ART. 4: CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Requisites:1. felony has been committed intentionally2. injury or damage done to the other party is
the direct, natural and logical consequenceof the felony
Hence, since he is still motivated by criminal intent,the offender is criminally liable in:
1. Error in personae mistake in identity2. Abberatio ictus mistake in blow
3. Praetor intentionem lack of intent tocommit so grave a wrong
PROXIMATE CAUSE the cause, which in thenatural and continuous sequence unbroken by anyefficient intervening cause, produces the injury,without which the result would not have occurred
Requisites:1. Act would have been an offense against
persons or property.2. There was criminal intent.3. Accomplishment is inherently impossible; or
inadequate or ineffectual means areemployed.
4. Act is not an actual violation of anotherprovision of the Code or of special law.
Impossible crime occurs when there is:1. inherent impossibility to commit the crime2. inadequate means to consummate the crime3. ineffectual means to consummate the crime
Note: Paragraph 2 does not apply to crimespunishable by special law, including profiteering, andillegal possession of firearms or drugs. There can beno executive clemency for these crimes.
STAGES OF EXECUTION:1. CONSUMMATED when all the elements
necessary for its execution and accomplishmentare present
2. FRUSTRATEDElements:
a. offender performs all acts of executionb. all these acts would produce the felony
as a consequencec. BUT the felony is NOT producedd. by reason of causes independent of the
will of the perpetrator
3. ATTEMPTEDElements:
a. offender commences the felony directlyby overt acts
b. does not perform all acts which wouldproduce the felony
c. his acts are not stopped by his ownspontaneous desistance
Par.1 Criminal liability for a felony committeddifferent from that intended to be committed
Par. 2 Impossible Crime
Art. 5: Duty of the court in connect ion wi thacts which should be repressed but which arenot covered by the law, and in cases ofexcessive penalties
ART. 6: CONSUMMATED, FRUSTRATED, ANDATTEMPTED FELONIES
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
4/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 4 of 174
Crimes, which do not admit of Frustrated andAttempted Stages:
1. Offenses punishable by Special Penal Laws,unless the law provides otherwise
2. Formal crimes consummated in oneinstance
(Ex: slander, adultery, etc.)3. Impossible Crimes4. Crimes consummated by mere attempt
(Ex: attempt to flee to an enemycountry, treason, corruption of minors)
5. Felonies by omission6. Crimes committed by mere agreement
(Ex: betting in sports: ending,corruption of public officers)
Crimes which do not admit o f Frustrated Stage:1. Rape2. Bribery3. Corruption of Public Officers4. Adultery5. Physical Injury
2 stages in the development of a crime:1. Internal acts
- e.g. mere ideas of the mind
- not punishable
2. External actsa. Preparatory acts - ordinarily not
punishable except whenconsidered by law as independentcrimes
(e.g. Art. 304, Possession ofpicklocks and similar tools)
b. Acts of Execution - punishable underthe RPC
General Rule: Punishable only when they have beenconsummated
Exception: Even if not consummated, ifcommitted against persons or property
Ex: slight physical injuries, theft, alteration ofboundary marks, malicious mischief, and intriguingagainst honor.
Note: Only principals and accomplices are liable;accessories are NOT liable even if committed againstpersons or property.
CONSPIRACY
Requisites:1. Two or more persons come to an agreement2. For the commission of a felony3. And they decide to commit it
Concepts of Conspiracy:1. As a cr ime in itself
Ex: conspiracy to commit rebellion,insurrection, treason, sedition, coup d etat
2. Merely as a means to commit a cr imeRequisites :a. a prior and express agreementb. participants acted in concert or
simultaneously, which is indicative ofa meeting of the minds towards acommon criminal objective
Note:Conspiracy to commit a felony is different fromconspiracy as a manner of incurring criminal liability.
General Rule: Conspiracy to commit a felony is notpunishable since it is merely a preparatory act.
Exception: when the law specifically provides fora penalty
Ex: rebellion, insurrection, sedition, coup detat
General Rule: The act of one is the act of all.Exception: Unless one or some of theconspirators committed some other crime whichis not part of the intended crime.
Attempted Frustrated Consummated
Overt acts of
execution are
started
All acts of execution are
present
All the acts of
execution are
present
Not all acts of
execution are
present
Crime sought to be
committed is not
achieved
The result
sought is
achieved
Due to reasons
other than the
spontaneous
desistance of the
perpetrator
Due to intervening
causes independent of
the will of the perpetrator
ART. 7: WHEN LIGHT FELONIES AREPUNISHABLE
ART. 8: CONSPIRACY AND PROPOSAL TOCOMMIT FELONY
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
5/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 5 of 174
Exception to the exception: When the actconstitutes an indivisible offense.
PROPOSAL TO COMMIT A FELONY
Requisites:1. A person has decided to commit a felony2. And proposes its execution to some other
person or persons
Importance of Classification
1. To determine whether the felonies can becomplexed or not.
2. To determine the prescription of the crimeand of the penalty.
Penalties (imprisonment):1. Grave felonies afflictive penalties: 6 yrs.
and 1 day to reclusion perpetua (life)2. Less grave felonies correctional penalties:
1 month and 1 day to 6 years3. Light felonies - arresto menor (1 day to 30
days)
General Rule: RPC provisions are supplementary tospecial laws.
Exceptions:1. when special law provides otherwise2. when provision of RPC are impossible of
application, either by express provisionor by necessary implication
Special Laws RPC
Terms imprisonment prision
correccional,prision mayor,
arresto mayor,
etc.
Attempted or
Frustrated
Stages
General Rule: Not
punishable
Exception: Unless
otherwise stated
Punishable
Plea of guilty as
mitigating
circumstance
No Yes
Minimum,
medium andmaximum
periods
Not applicable Yes
Penalty for
accessory or
accomplice
General Rule:
None
Exception: Unless
otherwise stated
Yes
Provisions of RPC applicable to special laws:
Art. 16 Participation of Accomplices
Art. 22 Retroactivity of Penal laws if favorableto the accused
Art. 45 Confiscation of instruments used inthe crime
Note: When the special law adopts the penaltiesimposed in the RPC i.e. penalties as reclusionperpetua, prision correccional, etc. the provisions ofthe RPC on imposition of penalties based on stagesof execution, degree of participation and attendanceof mitigating and aggravating circumstance may beapplied by necessary implication.
Conspiracy Proposal
Elements Agreement to
commit AND
commission
person decides to
commit a crime
AND proposes the
same to another
Crimes Conspiracy to
commit: sedition,treason, rebellion,
coup d etat
Proposal to
commit: treason,rebellion, coup d
etat
*no proposal to
commit sedition
OVERT ACTS IN CONSPIRACY MUSTCONSIST OF:
1. Active participation in the actualcommission of the crime itself, or
2. Moral assistance to his co-conspirators bybeing present at the time of thecommission of the crime, or
3. Exerting a moral ascendance over theother co-conspirators by moving them toexecute or implement the criminal plan
People v. Abut, et al. (GR No. 137601, April 24,2003)
ART. 9: GRAVE FELONIES, LESS GRAVEFELONIES AND LIGHT FELONIES
ART. 10: OFFENSES NOT SUBJECT TO THEPROVISIONS OF THIS CODE
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
6/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 6 of 174
Chapter TwoJUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
AND CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH EXEMPT
FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY
ART. 11. JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES where the act ofa person is in accordance with law such that saidperson is deemed not to have violated the law.
General Rule: No criminal and civil liability incurred.Exception: There is civil liability with respect topar. 4 where the liability is borne by persons
benefited by the act.
Elements:1. Unlawful Aggression
indispensable requirementThere must be actual physical assault oraggression or an immediate andimminent threat, which must be offensiveand positively strong.The defense must have been made
during the existence of aggression,otherwise, it is no longer justifying.While generally an agreement to fightdoes not constitute unlawful aggression,violation of the terms of the agreement tofight is considered an exception.
2. Reasonable necessity of the meansemployed to prevent or repel it
Test of reasonableness depends on:(1) weapon used by aggressor(2) physical condition, character, size
and other circumstances ofaggressor(3) physical condition, character, size
and circumstances of persondefending himself
(4) place and occasion of assault
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the partof the person defending himself
NOTE: Perfect equality between the weapons used,
nor material commensurability between the means ofattack and defense by the one defending himself andthat of the aggressor is not required
REASON: the person assaulted does not have
sufficient opportunity or time to think and calculate.
Rights included in self-defense:1. defense of person2. defense of rights protected by law3. defense of property (only if there is also an
actual and imminent danger on the person ofthe one defending)
4. defense of chastity
Kinds of Self-Defense:1. self-defense of chastity there must be an
attempt to rape the victim2. defense of property must be coupled with
anattack on the person of the owner, or onone entrusted with the care of such property.
3. self-defense in libel justified when thelibel is aimed at a persons good name.
Stand ground when in the right - the law doesnot require a person to retreat when his assailant israpidly advancing upon him with a deadly weapon.
NOTE: Under Republic Act 9262 (Anti-ViolenceAgainst Women and Their Children Act of 2004),victim-survivors who are found by the Courts to besuffering from Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) donot incur any criminal or civil liability despite absenceof the necessary elements for the justifyingcircumstance of self-defense in the RPC. BWS is a
scientifically defined pattern of psychological andbehavioral symptoms found in women living inbattering relationships as a result of cumulativeabuse.
Elements:1. unlawful aggression (indispensable
requirement)
Par. 1 Self-defensePeople v. Narvaez, (GR No. L-33466-67,
Apri l 20, 1983)Attack on property alone was deemedsufficient to comply with element ofunlawful aggression
Par. 2 Defense of Relative
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
7/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 7 of 174
2. reasonable necessity of the means employedto prevent or repel it
3. In case the provocation was given by theperson attacked, the one making the defensehad no part in such provocation.
Relative entitled to the defense:1. spouse2. ascendants3. descendants4. legitimate, natural or adopted brothers and
sisters, or relatives by affinity in the samedegrees
5. relatives by consanguinity within the 4thcivil
degree
NOTE: The relative defended may be the originalaggressor. All that is required to justify the act of therelative defending is that he takes no part in suchprovocation.
Elements:1. unlawful aggression (indispensable
requirement)2. reasonable necessity of the means employed
to prevent or repel it3. person defending be not induced by revenge,
resentment or other evil motive
Elements:1. evil sought to be avoided actually exists2. injury feared be greater than that done to
avoid it3. no other practical and less harmful means of
preventing it
NOTE: The necessity must not be due to thenegligence or violation of any law by the actor.
Elements:1. accused acted in the performance of duty or
in the lawful exercise of a right or office2. the injury caused or offense committed be
the necessary consequence of the dueperformance of the duty, or the lawfulexercise of such right or office.
NOTE: The accused must prove that he was dulyappointed to the position claimed he was dischargingat the time of the commission of the offense. It mustalso be shown that the offense committed was thenecessary consequence of such fulfillment of duty, or
lawful exercise of a right or office.
Elements:1. an order has been issued2. order has a lawful purpose (not patently
illegal)3. means used by subordinate to carry out said
order is lawful
NOTE: The superior officer giving the order cannotinvoke this justifying circumstance. Good faith ismaterial, as the subordinate is not liable for carrying
out an illegal order if he is not aware of its illegalityand he is not negligent.
General Rule: Subordinate cannot invoke thiscircumstance when order is patently illegal.
Exception: When there is compulsion of anirresistible force, or under impulse ofuncontrollable fear.
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES grounds forexemption from punishment because there is wantingin the agent of the crime any of the conditions whichmake the act voluntary or negligent.
Basis:The exemption from punishment is based onthe complete absence of intelligence, freedom ofaction, or intent, or on the absence of negligence onthe part of the accused.
Burden of proof: Any of the circumstances is amatter of defense and must be proved by thedefendant to the satisfaction of the court.
Justifying Exempting
Who/what
is
affected?
Act Actor
Nature of
act
act is considered
legal
act is wrongful but
actor not liable
Existence None Yes, but since
Par. 6 Obedience to a Superior Order
Par. 3 Defense of Stranger
Par. 4 State of Necessit y (Avoidance of GreaterEvil or Injury)
Par. 5 Fulfillment of Duty or Lawful Exercise ofa Right or Office
ART. 12: CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH EXEMPTFROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
8/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 8 of 174
of a crime voluntariness is absent
the actor is not liable
Liability No criminal and civil
liability BUT there is
civil liability as to
Art.11(4) (state ofnecessity)
No criminal liability but
there is civil liability
EXCEPT as to Art.
12(4) (injury by mereaccident) and (7)
(lawful cause)
IMBECILE one while advanced in age has a mentaldevelopment comparable to that of children between2 and 7 years old. He is exempt in all cases fromcriminal liability.
INSANE one who acts with complete deprivation of
intelligence/reason or without the least discernmentor with total deprivation of freedom of will. Mereabnormality of the mental faculties will not excludeimputability.
General Rule: Exempt from criminal liabilityException: The act was done during a lucidinterval.
NOTE: Defense must prove that the accused wasinsane at the time of the commission of the crimebecause the presumption is always in favor of sanity.
Requisite: Offender is under 9 years of age at thetime of the commission of the crime. There isabsolute criminal irresponsibility in the case of aminor under 9 years of age.
NOTE: Under R.A. 9344 or the Juvenile Justice AndWelfare Act a minor 15 years and below is exemptfrom criminal liability
NOTE: Such minor must have acted withoutdiscernment to be exempt. If with discernment, he iscriminally liable.
Presumption: The minor committed the crimewithout discernment.
DISCERNMENT mental capacity to fully appreciate
the consequences of the unlawful act, which is shownby the:
1. manner the crime was committed2. conduct of the offender after its commission
NOTE:Under R.A. 9344 a minor over 15 but butbelow 18 who acted without discernment isexempt from criminal liability
Elements:1. A person is performing a lawful act2. with due care3. He causes injury to another by mere accident4. Without fault or intention of causing it.
IRRESISTIBLE FORCE offender uses violence orphysical force to compel another person to commit acrime.
Elements:1. The compulsion is by means of physical
force.2. The physical force must be irresistible.3. The physical force must come from a third
person.
NOTE: Force must be irresistible so as to reduce theindividual to a mere instrument.
UNCONTROLLABLE FEAR offender employsintimidation or threat in compelling another to commita crime.DURESS use of violence or physical force
Elements:1. The threat which causes the fear is of an evil
greater than, or at least equal to, that whichhe is required to commit.
2. It promises an evil of such gravity andimminence that an ordinary man would havesuccumbed to it.
NOTE:Duress to be a valid defense should be basedon real, imminent or reasonable fear for ones life orlimb. It should not be inspired by speculative, fancifulor remote fear. A threat of future injury is not enough.
Par. 4 Accident without fault or intention ofcausing it
Par. 5 Irresis tible Force
Par. 6 Uncontrollable Fear
Par. 3 Person Over 9 and Under 15 Acting
Without Discernment
Par. 1 Imbecility or Insanity
Par. 2 Under Nine Years of A e
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
9/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 9 of 174
ACTUS ME INVITO FACTUS NON EST MEUSACTUS Any act done by me against my will is notmy act.
PAR 7. Insuperable Cause
INSUPERABLE CAUSE some motive, which haslawfully, morally or physically prevented a person todo what the law commands
Elements:1. An act is required by law to be done.2. A person fails to perform such act.3. His failure to perform such act was due to
some lawful or insuperable cause.
Ex:1. A priest cant be compelled to reveal what
was confessed to him.2. No available transportation officer not liable
for arbitrary detention3. Mother who was overcome by severe
dizziness and extreme debility, leaving childto die not liable for infanticide (People v.Bandian, 63 Phil 530)
ABSOLUTORY CAUSES where the act committedis a crime but for some reason of public policy andsentiment, there is no penalty imposed. Exemptingand justifying circumstances are absolutory causes.
Examples of such other circumstances are:1. spontaneous desistance (Art. 6)2. accessories exempt from criminal liability
(Art. 20)3. Death or physical injuries inflicted under
exceptional circumstances (Art. 247)4. persons exempt from criminal liability from
theft, swindling, malicious mischief (Art 332)5. instigation
NOTE: Entrapment is NOT an absolutory cause. Abuy-bust operation conducted in connection withillegal drug-related offenses is a form of entrapment.
Entrapment Instigation
The ways and means
are resorted to for the
purpose of trapping
and capturing the
lawbreaker in the
execution of his
criminal plan.
Instigator practically induces the
would-be accused into the
commission of the offense and
himself becomes a co-principal
NOT a bar to
accuseds prosecution
and conviction
Accused will be acquitted
NOT an absolutory
cause
Absolutory cause
Privileged Mitigating Ordinary Mitigating
Offset by any
aggravating
circumstance
Cannot be offset Can be offset by a
generic aggravating
circumstance
Effect on
penalty
Effect of imposing the
penalty by 1 or 2
degrees lower than
that provided by law
If not offset, has the
effect of imposing the
minimum period of
the penalty
Kinds
(Sources)
Minority, Incomplete
Self-defense, two or
more mitigating
circumstance without
any aggravating
circumstance (has the
effect of lowering the
penalty by onedegree). Art. 64, 68
and 69
Those
circumstances
enumerated in
paragraph 1 to 10 of
Article 13
Age Criminal Responsibility/ Effect
15years Absolute irresponsibility, exempting
circumstance
*as amended by RA 9344
15 < and 70 Mitigated responsibility, no imposition of
death penalty, execution of death
sentence may be suspended and
commuted
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES those which ifpresent in the commission of the crime reduces thepenalty of the crime but does not erase criminalliability nor change the nature of the crime
NOTE: A mitigating circumstance arising from a
single fact absorbs all the other mitigatingcircumstances arising from that same fact.
NOTE: This applies when not all the requisites arepresent.If two requisites are present, it is considered aprivileged mitigating circumstance. However, inreference to Art.11(4) if any of the last two requisitesis absent, there is only an ordinary mitigatingcircumstance. Remember though, that in self-
defense, defense of relative or stranger, unlawfulaggression must always be present as it is anindispensable requirement.
NOTE: Age of accused is determined by his age atthe date of commission of crime, not date of trial.
NOTE: Can be used only when the proven factsshow that there is a notable and evident disproportionbetween the means employed to execute the criminalact and its consequences.
Factors that can be considered are:1. weapon used2. injury inflicted3. part of the body injured4. mindset of offender at the time of commission
of crime
This provision addresses the intention of the offenderat the particular moment when the offender executesor commits the criminal act, not to his intention duringthe planning stage
NOTE: In crimes against persons if victim does notdie, the absence of the intent to kill reduces thefelony to mere physical injuries. It is not consideredas mitigating. It is mitigating only when the victimdies.
NOTE: It is not applicable to felonies by negligencebecause in felonies through negligence, the offenderacts without intent. The intent in intentional felonies isreplaced by negligence or imprudence. There is nointent on the part of the offender, which may beconsidered as diminished
Provocation any unjust or improper conduct or actof the offended party, capable of exciting, inciting orirritating anyone.
Requisites:1. provocation must be sufficient2. it must originate from the offended party3. must be immediate to the commission of the
crime by the person who is provoked
NOTE: Threat should not be offensive and positivelystrong. Otherwise, it would be an unlawfulaggression, which may give rise to self-defense andthus no longer a mitigating circumstance.
Provocation Vindication
Made directly only to the
person committing the
felony
Grave offense may be also
against the offenders
relatives mentioned by law
Cause that brought
about the provocation
need not be a grave
offense
Offended party must have
done a grave offense to the
offender or his relatives
Necessary that
provocation or threat
immediately preceded
the act. No time interval
May be proximate. Time
interval allowed
Par. 1 Incomplete Justi fying or ExemptingCircumstances
Par. 2 Under 18 or Over 70 Years Old
Par. 3 No Intention to Commit so Grave aWrong
ART. 13: MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
11/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 11 of 174
Requisites:
1. a grave offense done to the one committingthe felony, his spouse, ascendants,descendants, legitimate, natural or adoptedbrothers or sisters or relatives by affinitywithin the same degrees
2. the felony is committed in immediatevindication of such grave offense
NOTE: Immediate allows for a lapse of time, aslong as the offender is still suffering from the mentalagony brought about by the offense to him.(proximate time, not just immediately after)
Requisites:1. offender acted upon an impulse2. the impulse must be so powerful that it
naturally produced passion or obfuscation inhim
NOTE: Act must have been committed not in thespirit of lawlessness or revenge; act must come fromlawful sentiments.
Act, Which Gave Rise To Passion AndObfuscation:
1. That there be an act, both unlawful andunjust
2. The act be sufficient to produce a conditionof mind
3. That the act was proximate to the criminalact, not admitting of time during which theperpetrator might recover his normalequanimity
4. The victim must be the one who caused thepassion or obfuscation
NOTE: Passion and obfuscation cannot co-exist withtreachery since this means that the offender had timeto ponder his course of action.
PASSION & OBFUSCATION IRRESISTIBLE
FORCE
Mitigating Exempting
No physical force needed Requires physical
force
From the offender himself Must come from a
3rd person
Must come from lawful sentiments Unlawful
PASSION & OBFUSCATION PROVOCATION
Produced by an impulse which
may be caused by provocation
Comes from injured
party
Offense which engenders
perturbation of mind need not be
immediate. It is only required that
the influence thereof lasts until
the crime is committed
Immediately precede
the commission of the
crime
Effect is loss of reason and self-
control on the part of the offender
Same
VOLUNTARY
SURRENDER
VOLUNTARY
PLEA OF GUILT
Requisites: 1. offender not
actually arrested
2. offender
surrendered to
person in
authority
3. surrender was
voluntary
1. offender
spontaneously
confessed his
guilt
2. confession was
made in open
court, that is,
before the
competent courtthat is to try the
case
3. confession of guilt
was made prior to
the presentation
of the evidence
for the
prosecution
WHEN SURRENDER VOLUNTARY- must be spontaneous, showing the intent of theaccused to submit himself unconditionally to theauthorities, either because:
1. he acknowledges his guilt; or2. he wishes to save them the trouble and
expense necessarily incurred in his searchand capture.
NOTE: If both are present, considered as twoindependent mitigating circumstances. Furthermitigates penalty.
Par. 5 Vindication of Grave Offense
Par. 6 Passion or Obfuscation
Par. 7 Surrender and Confession of Guilt
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
12/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 12 of 174
NOTES: plea made after arraignment and after trial
has begun does not entitle accused to themitigating circumstance
If accused pleaded not guilty, even if during
arraignment, he is entitled to mitigatingcircumstance as long as he withdraws hisplea of not guilty to the charge before thefiscal could present his evidence.
Plea to a lesser charge is not a MitigatingCircumstance because to be such, the pleaof guilt must be to the offense charged.
Plea to the offense charged in the amendedinfo, lesser than that charged in the originalinfo, is Mitigating Circumstance.
The offender is deaf and dumb, blind or otherwisesuffering from some physical defect, restricting hismeans of action, defense or communication withothers.
NOTE: The physical defect must relate to the offensecommitted.
Requisites:1. The illness of the offender must diminish the
exercise of his will-power.2. Such illness should not deprive the offender
of consciousness of his acts.
Examples Not examples
defendant who is 60 years old
with failing eyesight is similar to a
case of one over 70 yrs old
killing the wrong
person
outraged feeling of owner of
animal taken for ransom is
analogous to vindication of grave
offense
not resisting arrest is
not the same as
voluntary surrender
impulse of jealous feeling, similar
to passion and obfuscation
running amuck is not
mitigating
voluntary restitution of property,
similar to voluntary surrender
extreme poverty, similar to
incomplete justification based on
state of necessity
CHAPTER FOUR
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH AGGRAVATECRIMINAL LIABILITY
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES Those which,if attendant in the commission of the crime, serve tohave the penalty imposed in its maximum periodprovided by law for the offense or those that changethe nature of the crime.
BASIS: The greater perversity of the offendermanifested in the commission of the felony as shownby:
1. the motivating power itself,2. the place of the commission,3. the means and ways employed4. the time, or5. the personal circumstances of the offender,
or the offended party.
KINDS OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES:
1. Generic - those which apply to all crimes
2. Specific- those which apply only to specificcrimes,
3. Qualifying- those that change the nature of
the crime
4. Inherent- which of necessity accompany
the commission of the crime, therefore not
considered in increasing the penalty to be
imposed
5. Special- those which arise under special
conditions to increase the penalty of the
offense and cannot be offset by mitigating
circumstances
GENERICAGGRAVATINGCIRCUMSTANCE
QUALIFYINGAGGRAVATINGCIRCUMSTANCE
EFFECT : When not setoff by any mitigatingcircumstance,Increases the penaltywhich should beimposed upon theaccused to the
EFFECT: Gives thecrime its proper andexclusive name andplaces the author ofthe crime in such asituation as todeserve no other
Par. 8 Physical Defect of Offender
Par. 9 Illness of the Offender
Par. 10 Similar and Analogous Circumstances
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
13/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 13 of 174
maximum period butwithout exceeding thelimit prescribed by law
penalty than thatspecially prescribedby law for saidcrimes (People v.Bayot, 64Phil269,
273)If not alleged in theinformation, aqualifying aggravatingcircumstance will beconsidered generic
To be consideredas such, MUST bealleged in theinformation
May be offset by amitigating circumstance.
Cannot be offset by amitigatingcircumstance
RULES ON AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES:1. Aggravating circumstances shall NOTbe
appreciated if:
a) They constitute a crime speciallypunishable by law, orb) It is included by the law in defining a crime
with a penalty prescribed, and thereforeshall not be taken into account for thepurpose of increasing the penalty.
Ex: That the crime be committed by means offire,explosion (Art. 14, par. 12) is in itself acrime of arson (Art. 321) or a crime involvingdestruction (Art. 324). It is not to be considered toincrease the penalty for the crime of arson or forthe crime involving destruction.
2. The same rule shall apply with respect to anyaggravating circumstance inherent in the crime tosuch a degree that it must of necessityaccompany the commission thereof(Art.62, par.2)
3. Aggravating circumstances which arise:a) From the moral attributes of the offender;b) From his private relations with the offended
party; orc) From any personal cause,
shall only serve to aggravate the liability of theprincipals, accomplices and accessories as towhom such circumstances are attendant. (Art.
62, par. 3)
4. The circumstances which consist :a) In the material execution of the act, orb) In the means employed to accomplish it,
shall serve to aggravate the liability of only thosepersons who had knowledge of them at the timeof the execution of the act or their cooperationtherein. Except when there is proof of conspiracyin which case the act of one is deemed to be the
act of all, regardless of lack of knowledge of thefacts constituting the circumstance. (Art. 62, par.4)
5. Aggravating circumstances, regardless of its
kind, should be specifically alleged in theinformation AND proved as fully as the crimeitself in order to increase the penalty. (Sec. 9,Rule 110, 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure)
6. When there is more than one qualifyingaggravating circumstance present, one of themwill be appreciated as qualifying aggravatingwhile the others will be considered as genericaggravating.
ART. 14: AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Par. 1.That advantage be taken by the offender ofhis public position
Requisites:1. Offender is public officer2. Public officer must use the influence,
prestige, or ascendancy which his officegives him as means to realize criminalpurpose
It is not considered as an aggravatingcircumstance where taking advantage of official
position is made by law an integral elementof thecrime or inherentin the offense,
Ex: malversation (Art. 217), falsification of adocument committed by public officers (Art.171).
When the public officer did not take advantage ofthe influence of his position, this aggravatingcircumstance is not present
NOTE : Taking advantage of a public position isalso inherent in the case of accessories under
Art. 19, par. 3 (harboring, concealing, or assistingin the escape of the principal of the crime), and incrimes committed by public officers (Arts. 204-
245).
Par. 2.That the crime be committed in contemptof or w ith insult to public authorities
Requisites:1. That the public authority is engaged in the
exercise of his functions.2. That he who is thus engaged in the exercise
of said functions is not the person againstwhom the crime is committed.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
14/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 14 of 174
3. The offender knows him to be a publicauthority.
4. His presence has not prevented the offenderfrom committing the criminal act.
PERSON IN AUTHORITY public authority, orperson who is directly vested with jurisdiction and hasthe power to govern and execute the lawsEx:
1. Governor2. Mayor3. Barangay captain/ chairman4. Councilors5. Government agents6. Chief of Police
NOTE: A teacher or professor of a public orrecognized private school is not a public authoritywithin the contemplation of this paragraph. While heis a person in authority under Art. 152, that status isonly for purposes of Art. 148 (direct assault) and Art.152 (resistance and disobedience).
The crime should not be committed against thepublic authority (otherwise it will constitute directassault under Art.148)
This is NOT applicable when committed in thepresence of a mere agent.
AGENT subordinate public officer charged w/ themaintenance of public order and protection andsecurity of life and property
Ex: barrio vice lieutenant, barrio councilman
Par. 3.That the act be committed:(1) with insult or in disregard of the respectdue the offended party on account of his(a)rank, (b) age, or (c) sex or
(2) that it be committed in the dwelling of theoffended party, if the latter has not givenprovocation
Rules regarding par 3(1):1. These circumstances shall only be
considered as one aggravating circumstance.2. Rank, age, sex may be taken into account
only in crimes against persons or honor, theycannot be invoked in crimes against property.
3. It must be shown that in the commission ofthe crime the offender deliberately intendedto offend or insult the sex, age and rank ofthe offended party.
RANK The designation or title of distinction used tofix the relative position of the offended party in
reference to others (There must be a difference in thesocial condition of the offender and the offendedparty).
AGE may refer to old age or the tender age of the
victim.
SEX refers to the female sex, not to the male sex.
The AC of disregard of rank, age, or sex is notapplicable in the following cases:
1. When the offender acted with passion andobfuscation.
2. When there exists a relationship between theoffended party and the offender.
3. When the condition of being a woman isindispensable in the commission of thecrime.
(Ex: in parricide, abduction, seductionand rape)
People vs. Lapaz, March 31, 1989Disregard of sex and age are not absorbed in
treachery because treachery refers to the manner ofthe commission of the crime, while disregard of sexand age pertains to the relationship of the victim.
DWELLING must be a building or structureexclusively used for rest and comfort (combination ofhouse and store not included), may be temporary asin the case of guests in a house or bedspacers. Itincludes dependencies, the foot of the staircase andthe enclosure under the house
NOTES: The aggravating circumstance of dwelling
requires that the crime be wholly or partlycommitted therein or in any integral part thereof.
Dwelling does not mean the permanentresidence or domicile of the offended party orthat he must be the owner thereof. He must,however, be actually living or dwelling thereineven for a temporary duration or purpose.
It is not necessary that the accused should haveactually entered the dwelling of the victim to
commit the offense; it is enough that the victimwas attacked inside his own house, although theassailant may have devised means to perpetratethe assault from without.
What aggravates the commission of the crime inones dwelling:
1. The abuse of confidence which the offendedparty reposed in the offender by opening thedoor to him; or
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
15/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 15 of 174
2. The violation of the sanctity of the home bytrespassing therein with violence or againstthe will of the owner.
Meaning of provocation in the aggravating
circumstance of dwelling:The provocation must be:1. Given by the owner of the dwelling,2. Sufficient, and3. Immediate to the commission of the crime.
NOTE: If all these conditions are present, theoffended party is deemed to have given theprovocation, and the fact that the crime is committedin the dwelling of the offended party is NOT anaggravating circumstance.
REASON: When it is the offended party who hasprovoked the incident, he loses his right to therespect and consideration due him in his ownhouse.
Dwelling is not aggravating in the followingcases:
1. When both the offender and the offendedparty are occupants of the same house, andthis is true even if offender is a servant in thehouse.
exception: In case of adultery in theconjugal dwelling, the same isaggravating. However, if the paramouralso dwells in the conjugal dwelling, the
applicable aggravating circumstance isabuse of confidence.
2. When robbery is committed by the use offorce upon things, dwelling is not aggravatingbecause it is inherent.
However, dwelling is aggravating inrobbery with violence against orintimidation of persons because this classof robbery can be committed without thenecessity of trespassing the sanctity of theoffended partys house.
3. In the crime of trespass to dwelling, it isinherent or included by law in defining thecrime.
4. When the owner of the dwelling gavesufficient and immediate provocation.
There must exist a close relation betweenthe provocation made by the victim and thecommission of the crime by the accused.
5. The victim is not a dweller of the house.
Par. 4.That the act be commit ted with:(1) abuse of confidence or(2) obvious ungratefulness
There are two aggravating circumstances presentunder par.4 which must be independentlyappreciated if present in the same case
While one may be related to the other in the factualsituation in the case, they cannot be lumpedtogether. Abuse of confidence requires a specialconfidential relationship between the offender andthe victim, while this is not required for there to beobvious ungratefulness
Requisites Of Abuse Of Confidence:1. That the offended party had trusted the
offender.2. That the offender abused such trust by
committing a crime against the offendedparty.
3. That the abuse of confidence facilitated thecommission of the crime.
NOTE: Abuse of confidence is inherent inmalversation (Art. 217), qualified theft (Art. 310),estafa by conversion or misappropriation (Art. 315),and qualified seduction (Art. 337).
Requisites of obvious ungratefulness:1. That the offended party had trusted the
offender;2. That the offender abused such trust by
committing a crime against the offendedparty.
3. That the act be committed with obviousungratefulness.
NOTE: The ungratefulness contemplated by par. 4must be such clear and manifest ingratitude on thepart of the accused.
Par. 5.That the crime be committed in the palaceof the Chief Executive, or in his presence, or
where public authorities are engaged in thedischarge of their duties, or in a placededicated to religious worship.
Actual performance of duties is not necessarywhen crime is committed in the palace or in thepresence of the Chief Executive
Requisites Regarding Public Authorities:1. crime occurred in the public office
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
16/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 16 of 174
2. public authorities are actually performingtheir public duties
PAR. 5. Where publicauthorities are engaged
in the discharge of theirduties
PAR. 2. Contempt orinsult to public
authorities
FOR BOTH, Public authorities are in the performanceof their duties
Place where public dut y is performedIn their office. Outside of their office.
The offended partyMay or may not be thepublic authority
Public authority shouldnot be the offendedparty
Requisites (Place Dedicated To ReligiousWorship):
1. The crime occurred in a place dedicated tothe worship of God regardless of religion
2. The offender must have decided to committhe crime when he entered the place ofworship
Except for the third which requires that officialfunctions are being performed at the time of thecommission of the crime, the other placesmentioned are aggravating per se even if noofficial duties or acts of religious worship arebeing conducted there.
Cemeteries, however respectable they may be,
are not considered as place dedicated to theworship of God.
Par. 6.That the crime be committed(1) in the nighttime, or(2) in an uninhabited place, or(3) by a band,
whenever such circumstance may facilitatethe commission o f the offense
NOTE: When present in the same case and theirelement are distinctly palpable and can subsistindependently, they shall be considered separately.
When nighttime, uninhabited place or bandaggravating:
1. When it facilitated the commission of thecrime; or
2. When especially soughtfor by the offender toinsure the commission of the crime or for thepurpose of impunity; or
3. When the offender took advantage thereoffor the purpose of impunity
NIGHTTIME (obscuridad) that period of darknessbeginning at the end of dusk and ending at dawn.
Commission of the crime must begin and beaccomplished in the nighttime. When the
place of the crime is illuminated by light,nighttime is not aggravating. It is notconsidered aggravating when the crimebegan at daytime.
Nighttime is not especially sought for whenthe notion to commit the crime wasconceived of shortly before commission orwhen crime was committed at night upon acasual encounter
However, nighttime need not be specificallysought for when (1) it facilitated thecommission of the offense, or (2) theoffender took advantage of the same tocommit the crime
A bare statement that crime was committedat night is insufficient. The information mustallege that nighttime was sought for or takenadvantage of, or that it facilitated the crime
GENERAL RULE: Nighttime is absorbed intreachery.
EXCEPTION: Where both the treacherous modeof attack and nocturnity were deliberately decidedupon in the same case, they can be consideredseparately if such circumstances have differentfactual bases. Thus: In People vs. Berdida, et. al. (June 30,
1966), nighttime was considered since it waspurposely sought, and treachery was furtherappreciated because the victims hands andarms were tied together before he wasbeaten up by the accused.
In People vs. Ong, et. al. (Jan. 30, 1975),there was treachery as the victim wasstabbed while lying face up and defenseless,and nighttime was considered upon proofthat it facilitated the commission of theoffense and was taken advantage of by theaccused.
UNINHABITED PLACE (despoblado) one wherethere are no houses at all, a place at a considerabledistance from town, where the houses are scatteredat a great distance from each other
Solitude must be sought to better attain thecriminal purpose
What should be considered here is whether in theplace of the commission of the offense, there wasa reasonable possibility of the victim receivingsome help.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
17/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 17 of 174
BAND (en cuadrilla) whenever there are morethan 3 armed malefactors that shall have actedtogether in the commission of an offense
NOTE:There mustbe four or more armed men
If one of the four-armed malefactors is a principalby inducement, they do not form a band becauseit is undoubtedly connoted that he had no directparticipation.
By a band is aggravating in crimes againstproperty or against persons or in the crime ofillegal detention or treason but does not apply tocrimes against chastity
By a band is inherent in brigandage This aggravating circumstance is absorbed in the
circumstance of abuse of superior strength
Par. 7.That the crime be committed on theoccasion of a conflagration, shipwreck,earthquake, epidemic or other calamity ormisfortune.
Requisites:1. The crime was committed when there was a
calamity or misfortune2. The offender took advantage of the state of
confusion or chaotic condition from suchmisfortune
If the offended was PROVOKED by the offendedparty during the calamity/misfortune, this
aggravating circumstance may not be taken intoconsideration.
Par. 8.That the cr ime be commit ted with the aid of(1) armed men or(2) persons who insure or afford impunity
Requisites:1. That armed men or persons took part in the
commission of the crime, directly orindirectly.
2. That the accused availedhimself of their aidor relied upon them when the crime was
committed.
NOTE: This aggravating circumstance requires thatthe armed men are accomplices who take part in aminor capacity directly or indirectly, and not whenthey were merely present at the crime scene. Neithershould they constitute a band, for then the properaggravating circumstance would be cuadrilla.
When This Aggravating Circumstance Shall NotBe Considered:
1. When both the attacking party and the partyattacked were equally armed.
2. When the accused as well as those whocooperated with him in the commission of thecrime acted under the same plan and for the
same purpose.3. When the others were only casually presentand the offender did not avail himself of anyof their aid or when he did not knowinglycount upon their assistance in thecommission of the crime
Par. 6 By a band Par. 8. With the aid ofarmed men
As to their number
Requires more than threearmed malefactors (i.e.,
at least four)
At least two
As to their act ionRequires that more thanthree armed malefactorsshall have acted togetherin the commission of anoffense.
This circumstance ispresent even if one of theoffenders merely relied ontheir aid, for actual aid isnot necessary.
If there are four armed men, aid of armed men isabsorbed in employment of a band. If there arethree armed men or less, aid of armed men maybe the aggravating circumstance.
Aid of armed men includes armed women.
Par. 9. That the accused is a recidivist
RECIDIVIST one who at the time of his trial for onecrime, shall have been previously convicted by final
judgment of another crime embraced in the same titleof the RPC.
Requisites:1. That the offender is on trial for an offense;2. That he was previously convicted by final
judgmentof another crime;3. That both the first and the second offenses
are embraced in the same title of the Code;4. That the offender is convicted of the new
offense.
MEANING OF at the time of his trial for onecrime.It is employed in its general sense, including therendering of the judgment. It is meant to includeeverything that is done in the course of the trial, from
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
18/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 18 of 174
arraignment until after sentence is announced by thejudge in open court.
What is controlling is the TIME OF THE TRIAL,not the time of the commission of the offense.
GENERAL RULE: To prove recidivism, it isnecessary to allege the same in the information andto attach thereto certified copy of the sentencesrendered against the accused.
Exception: If the accused does not object andwhen he admits in his confession and on thewitness stand.
Recidivism must be taken into account no matterhow many years have intervened between thefirst and second felonies.
Amnesty extinguishes the penalty and its effects.However, pardon does not obliterate the fact thatthe accused was a recidivist. Thus, even if theaccused was granted a pardon for the firstoffense but he commits another felony embracedin the same title of the Code, the first convictionis still counted to make him a recidivist
Being an ordinary aggravating circumstance,recidivism affects only the periods of a penalty,except in prostitution and vagrancy (Art. 202) andgambling (PD 1602) wherein recidivism increasesthe penalties by degrees. No other genericaggravating circumstance produces this effect
In recidivism it is sufficient that the succeedingoffense be committed after the commissionof thepreceding offense provided that at the time of histrial for the second offense, the accused hadalready been convicted of the first offense.
If both offenses were committed on the samedate, they shall be considered as only one,hence, they cannot be separately counted inorder to constitute recidivism. Also, judgments ofconvicted handed down on the same day shall beconsidered as only one conviction.REASON:Because the Code requires that to be
considered as separate convictions, at the time ofhis trial for one crime the accused shall havebeen previously convicted by final judgment ofthe other.
Par. 10. That the offender has been previouslypunished for an offense to which the lawattaches an equal or greater penalty or fortwo or more crimes to which i t attaches alighter penalty.
Requisites Of ReiteracionOr Habituality:1. That the accused is on trial for an offense;2. That he previously served sentence for
another offense to which the law attaches an
a) Equal orb) Greater penalty, orc) For two or more crimes to which it
attaches a lighter penalty than thatfor the new offense; and
3. That he is convicted of the new offense
HABITUALITY RECIDIVISM
As to the firs t offense
It is necessary that theoffender shall haveserved out hissentence for the first
offense
It is enough that afinal judgmenthasbeen rendered in thefirst offense.
As to the kind of of fenses involved
The previous andsubsequent offensesmust notbe embraced in the sametitle of the Code.
Requires that theoffenses be includedin the same title of theCode.
THE FOUR FORMS OF REPETITION ARE:
1. Recidivism (par. 9, Art. 14) Where a person,on separate occasions, is convicted of two offensesembraced in the same title in the RPC. This is ageneric aggravating circumstance.
2. Reiteracion or Habituality (par. 10, Art. 14) Where the offender has been previously punished foran offense to which the law attaches an equal orgreater penalty or for two crimes to which it attachesa lighter penalty. This is a generic aggravatingcircumstance.
3. Multi-recidivism or Habitual delinquency (Art.62, par, 5) Where a person within a period of tenyears from the date of his release or last conviction ofthe crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries,robbery, theft, estafa or falsification, is found guilty of
the said crimes a third time or oftener. This is anextraordinary aggravating circumstance.
4. Quasi-recidivism (Art. 160) Where a personcommits felony before beginning to serve or whileserving sentence on a previous conviction for afelony. This is a special aggravating circumstance.
Since reiteracion provides that the accused hasduly served the sentence for his previousconviction/s, or is legally considered to have
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
19/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 19 of 174
done so, quasi-recidivism cannot at the sametime constitute reiteracion, hence thisaggravating circumstance cannot apply to aquasi-recidivist.
If the same set of facts constitutes recidivism andreiteracion, the liability of the accused should be
aggravated by recidivism which can easily beproven.
Par. 11. That the crime be commit ted inconsideration of price, reward or promise.
Requisites:1. There are at least 2 principals:
The principal by inducement (one whooffers)
The principal by direct participation(accepts)
2. The price, reward, or promise should beprevious to and in consideration of thecommission of the criminal act
NOTE: The circumstance is applicable to bothprincipals .It affects the person who received theprice / reward as well as the person who gave it.
If without previous promise it was givenvoluntarily after the crime had been committed asan expression of his appreciation for thesympathy and aid shown by the other accused, itshould not be taken into consideration for the
purpose of increasing the penalty.
The price, reward or promise need not consist ofor refer to material things or that the same wereactually delivered, it being sufficient that the offermade by the principal by inducement beaccepted by the principal by direct participationbefore the commission of the offense.
The inducement must be the primaryconsideration for the commission of the crime.
Par. 12. That the crime be committed by means of
inundation, fire, poison, explosion, strandingof a vessel or intentional damage thereto,derailment of a locomotive, or by use of anyartifice involving great waste and ruin
The circumstances under this paragraph will onlybe considered as aggravating if and when theyare used by the offender as a means toaccomplish a criminal purpose
When another aggravating circumstance alreadyqualifies the crime, any of these aggravatingcircumstances shall be considered as genericaggravating circumstance only
When used as a means to kill another person,the crime is qualified to murder.
PAR. 12 by meansof inundation, fire,etc.
PAR. 7 on theoccasion of aconflagration,
shipwreck, etc.
The crime iscommitted by meansof any such actsinvolving great wasteor ruin.
The crime is committedon the occasion of acalamity or misfortune.
Par. 13. That the act be committed with evidentpremeditation
Requisites:The prosecution must prove
1. The time when the offender determined tocommit the crime;
2. An act manifestly indicating that the culprithas clung to his determination; and
3. A sufficient lapse of time between thedetermination and execution, to allow him toreflect upon the consequences of his act andto allow his conscience to overcome the
resolution of his will.
Essence of premeditation: The execution of thecriminal act must be preceded by cool thought andreflection upon the resolution to carry out the criminalintent during the space of time sufficient to arrive at acalm judgment.
To establish evident premeditation, it must beshown that there was a period sufficient to affordfull opportunity for meditation and reflection, atime adequate to allow the conscience toovercome the resolution of the will, as well as
outward acts showing the intent to kill. It must beshown that the offender had sufficient time toreflect upon the consequences of his act but stillpersisted in his determination to commit thecrime. (PEOPLE vs. SILVA, et. al., GR No.140871, August 8, 2002)
Premeditation is absorbedby reward or promise.
When the victim is different from that intended,premeditation is not aggravating. However, if the
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
20/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 20 of 174
offender premeditated on the killing of anyperson, it is proper to consider against theoffender the aggravating circumstance ofpremeditation, because whoever is killed by himis contemplated in his premeditation.
Par. 14. That (1) craft, (2) fraud, or (3) disguise beemployed.
RequisiteThe offender must have actually used craft, fraud, ordisguise to facilitate the commission of the crime.
CRAFT (astucia) involved the use of intellectualtrickery or cunning on the part of the accused.A chicanery resorted to by the accused to aid in theexecution of his criminal design. It is employed as ascheme in the execution of the crime.
FRAUD (fraude) insidious words or machinationsused to induce the victim to act in a manner whichwould enable the offender to carry out his design.
FRAUD CRAFT
Where there is a directinducementby insidiouswords or machinations,fraud is present.
The act of theaccused done inorder not to arousethe suspicion of thevictim constitutescraft.
Craft and fraud may be absorbed in treachery ifthey have been deliberately adopted as themeans, methods or forms for the treacherousstrategy, or they may co-exist independentlywhere they are adopted for a different purpose inthe commission of the crime.
Ex: In People vs. San Pedro (Jan. 22, 1980),
where the accused pretended to hire thedriver in order to get his vehicle, it was heldthat there was craft directed to the theft of thevehicle, separate from the meanssubsequently used to treacherously kill thedefenseless driver.
InPeople vs. Masilang(July 11, 1986)therewas also craft where after hitching a ride, theaccused requested the driver to take them toa place to visit somebody, when in fact theyhad already planned to kill the driver.
DISGUISE (disfraz) resorting to any device toconceal identity.
The test of disguise is whether the device orcontrivance resorted to by the offender was
intended to or did make identification moredifficult, such as the use of a mask or false hair orbeard.
The use of an assumed name in the publicationof a libel constitutes disguise.
Par. 15. That (1) advantage be taken o f superiorstrength, or (2) means be employed toweaken the defense.
Par. 15 contemplates two aggravating circumstances,either of which qualifies a killing to murder.
MEANING OF advantage be taken :
To deliberately use excessive force that is out ofproportion to the means for self-defense available tothe person attacked. (PEOPLE vs. LOBRIGAS, et.al., GR No. 147649, December 17, 2002)
No Advantage Of Superior Strength In TheFollowing:
1. One who attacks another with passion andobfuscation does not take advantage of hissuperior strength.
2. When a quarrel arose unexpectedlyand thefatal blow was struck at a time when theaggressor and his victim were engagedagainst each other as man to man.
TEST for abuse of superior strength: therelative strength of the offender and his victimand whether or not he took advantage of hisgreater strength.
When there are several offenders participating inthe crime, they must ALL be principals by directparticipation and their attack against the victimmust be concerted and intended to be so.
Abuse of superior strength is inherent in thecrime of parricide where the husband kills thewife. It is generally accepted that the husband isphysically stronger than the wife.
Abuse of superior strength is also present whenthe offender uses a weapon which is out ofproportion to the defense available to theoffended party.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
21/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 21 of 174
BY A BAND ABUSE OFSUPERIORSTRENGTH
The element ofband is appreciated
when the offense iscommitted by morethan three armedmalefactorsregardless of thecomparativestrength of thevictim or victims.
The gravamen ofabuse of superiority
is the takingadvantage by theculprits of theircollective strength tooverpower theirrelatively weakervictim or victims.
Hence, what is takeninto account here isnot the number ofaggressors nor thefact that they arearmed, but theirrelative physicalstrength vis-a vistheoffended party.
NOTE:Abuse of superior strength absorbs cuadrilla(band).
MEANING OF Means employed to weakendefense - the offender employs means thatmateriallyweaken the resisting power of the offendedparty.
Ex:1. Where one, struggling with another, suddenly
throws a cloak over the head of his opponentand while in this situation he wounds or killshim.
2. One who, while fighting with another,suddenly casts sand or dirt upon the lattereyes and then wounds or kills him.
3. When the offender, who had the intention tokill the victim, made the deceasedintoxicated, thereby materially weakening thelatters resisting power.
NOTE: This circumstance is applicable only tocrimes against persons, and sometimes againstperson and property, such as robbery withphysical injuries or homicide.
Par. 16. That the act be committed with treachery(alevosia)
TREACHERY when the offender commits any ofthe crimes against the person, employing means,methods or forms in the execution thereof which tend
directly and specially to insure its execution withoutrisk to himself arising from the defense which theoffended party might make.
Requisites:
1. That at the time of the attack, the victim wasnot in a position to defend himself; and
2. That the offender consciously adopted theparticular means, method or form of attackemployed by him.
TEST:It is not only the relative position of the partiesbut, more specifically, whether or not the victim wasforewarned or afforded the opportunity to make adefense or to ward off the attack.
Rules Regarding Treachery:1. Applicable only to crimes against persons.2. Means, methods or forms need not insure
accomplishment of crime.3. The mode of attack must be consciously
adopted.
Treachery is taken into account even if the crimeagainst the person is complexed with anotherfelony involving a different classification in theCode. Accordingly, in the special complex crimeof robbery with homicide, treachery but can beappreciated insofar as the killing is concerned.
The suddenness of attack in itself does notconstitute treachery, even if the purpose was to
kill, so long as the decision was made all of asudden and the victims helpless position wasaccidental.
Treachery applies in the killing of a child even ifthe manner of attack is not shown.
Treachery must be proved by clear andconvincing evidence
Treachery is considered against all the offenderswhen there is conspiracy.
WHEN MUST TREACHERY BE PRESENT:1. When the aggression is continuous,
treachery must be present in the beginning ofthe assault. (PEOPLE vs. MANALAD, GRNo. 128593, August 14, 2002)
Thus, even if the deceased was shotwhile he was lying wounded on theground, it appearing that the firing of theshot was a mere continuation of theassault in which the deceased was
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
22/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 22 of 174
wounded, with no appreciable timeintervening between the delivery of theblows and the firing of the shot, it cannotbe said that the crime was attended bytreachery.
2. When the assault was not continuous, inthat there was interruption, it is sufficient thattreachery was present at the moment thefatal blow was given.
Hence, even though in the inception ofthe aggression which ended in the deathof the deceased, treachery was notpresent, if there was a break in thecontinuity of the aggression and at thetime of the fatal wound was inflicted onthe deceased he was defenseless, thecircumstance of treachery must be takeninto account.
Treachery Should Be Considered Even If:1. The victim was not predetermined but there
was a generic intent to treacherously kill anyfirst two persons belonging to a class. (Thesame rule obtains for evident premeditation).
2. There was aberratio ictusand the bullet hit aperson different from that intended. (The ruleis different in evident premeditation).
3. There was error in personae, hence the
victim was not the one intended by theaccused. (A different rule is applied inevident premeditation).
REASON FOR THE RULE: When there istreachery, it is impossible for either the intendedvictim or the actual victim to defend himselfagainst the aggression.
TREACHERY ABSORBS:1. Craft2. Abuse of superior strength3. Employing means to weaken the defense
4. Cuadrilla (band)5. Aid of armed men6. Nighttime
TREACHERY ABUSE OF
SUPERIOR
STRENGTH
MEANS
EMPLOYED TO
WEAKEN
DEFENSE
Means, methods
or forms areemployed by the
offender to make it
impossible or hard
for the offended
party to put any
sort of resistance
Offender does
not employmeans,
methods or
forms of attack,
he only takes
advantage of his
superior
strength
Means are
employed but itonly materially
weakens the
resisting power of
the offended
party
Par. 17. That means be employed orcircumstances brought about which addignominy to the natural effects of the act
IGNOMINY is a circumstance pertaining to themoral order, which adds disgrace and obloquy to thematerial injury caused by the crime.
MEANING OF which add ignominy to the naturaleffects thereofThe means employed or the circumstances broughtabout must tend to make the effects of the crimemore humiliating to victim or to put the offended partyto shame, or add to his moral suffering. Thus it isincorrect to appreciate ignominy where the victim wasalready dead when his body was dismembered, for
such act may not be considered to have added to thevictims moral suffering or humiliation. (People vs.Carmina, G.R. No. 81404, January 28, 1991)
Applicable to crimes against chastity, lessserious physical injuries, light or gravecoercion, and murder.
Par. 18. That the crime be commit ted after anunlawful entry.
UNLAWFUL ENTRY -when an entrance is effectedby a way not intended for the purpose.
NOTE: Unlawful entry must be a means to effectentrance and not for escape.
REASON FOR AGGRAVATION:One who acts, not respecting the walls erected bymen to guard their property and provide for theirpersonal safety, shows a greater perversity, a greateraudacity; hence, the law punishes him with moreseverity.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
23/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 23 of 174
Par. 19. That as a means to the commission o f acrime, a wall, roof, floor, door, or w indow bebroken.
Appl icable only if such acts were done bythe offender to effect ENTRANCE. If thewall, etc., is broken in order to get out of theplace, it is not an aggravating circumstance.
It is NOT necessary that the offender shouldhave entered the building Therefore, If theoffender broke a window to enable himself toreach a purse with money on the table nearthat window, which he took while his bodywas outside of the building, the crime of theftwas attended by this aggravatingcircumstance.
PAR. 19 PAR. 18
It involves the breaking(rompimiento) of theenumerated parts ofthe house.
Presupposes that thereis no such breaking asby entry through thewindow.
NOTE: Breaking in is lawful in the followinginstances:
1. An officer, in order to make an arrest, maybreak open a door or window of any buildingin which the person to be arrested is or is
reasonably believed to be;2. An officer, if refused admittance, may breakopen any door or window to execute thesearch warrant or liberate himself,
3. Replevin, Section 4, Rule 60 of the Rules ofCourt
Par. 20. That the crime be commit ted(1) with the aid of persons under fi fteen (15)years of age, or(2) by means of motor vehicles, airships , orother similar means.
TWO DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES GROUPEDIN THIS PARAGRAPH:1. With the aid of persons under fifteen years of
age: Intends to repress, so far as possible, the
frequent practice resorted to by professionalcriminals to avail themselves of minors takingadvantage of their irresponsibility.
2. By means of motor vehicles, airships, orother similar means:
Intended to counteract the great facilitiesfound by modern criminals in said means tocommit crime and flee and abscond once thesame is committed.
Use of motor vehicle is aggravating wherethe accused purposely and deliberatelyused
the motor vehicle in going to the place of thecrime, in carrying away the effects thereof,and in facilitating their escape.
MEANING OF or other simi lar means
Should be understood as referring to motorizedvehicles or other efficient means of transportationsimilar to automobile or airplane.
Par. 21. That the wrong done in the commission
of the c rime be deliberately augmented bycausing other wrong not necessary for itscommission
CRUELTY there is cruelty when the culprit enjoysand delights in making his victim suffer slowly andgradually, causing unnecessary physical pain in theconsummation of the criminal act.
Requisites:1. That the injury caused be deliberately
increasedby causing other wrong;2. That the other wrong be unnecessaryfor the
execution of the purpose of the offender.
Cruelty is not inherent in crimes against persons. In order for it to be appreciated, there must be
positive proof that the wounds found on the bodyof the victim were inflicted while he was still alivein order unnecessarily to prolong physicalsuffering.
Cruelty cannot be presumed If the victim was already dead when the acts of
mutilation were being performed, this would alsoqualify the killing to murder due to outraging ofhis corpse.
IGNOMINY (PAR.17) CRUELTY (PAR. 21)Involves MORALsuffering
Refers to PHYSICALsuffering
Unlike mitigating circumstances (par. 10, Art.13), there is NO provision for aggravatingcircumstances of a similar or analogouscharacter.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
24/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 24 of 174
CHAPTER FIVEALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES
ART.15 Concept of Alternative Circumstances
BASIS:
The nature and effects of the crime and the otherconditions attending its commission.
THE ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE:1. Relationship;2. Intoxication; and3. Degree of instruction and education of the
offender.
RELATIONSHIP
The alternative circumstance of relationship shall betaken into consideration when the offended party isthe
1. Spouse,2. Ascendant,3. Descendant,4. Legitimate, natural, or adopted brother or
sister, or5. Relative by affinity in the same degree of the
offender.
Other Relatives Included (By Analogy):1. The relationship of stepfather or stepmother
and stepson or stepdaughter.REASON: It is the duty of thestepparents to bestow upon their
stepchildren a mothers/fathers affection,care and protection.
2. The relationship of adopted parent andadopted child.
NOTE: But the relationship of uncle and niece is notcovered by any of the relationship mentioned.
When Relationship Mitigating And WhenAggravat ing:1. As a rule, relationship is mitigating in crimes
against property, by analogy to the provisions ofArt. 332. Thus, relationship is mitigating in the crimesof robbery (Arts. 294-302), usurpation (Art.
312), fraudulent insolvency (Art. 314) andarson (Arts. 321-322, 325-326).
2. In crimes against persons a) It is aggravatingwhere the offended party is
a relative ofI. a higher degreethan the offender, or
II. when the offender and the offended partyare relatives of the same level (e.g.brothers)
b) But when it comes to physical injuries:i. It is aggravating when the crime
involves serious physical injuries (Art.263), even if the offended party is adescendant of the offender. But theserious physical injuries must not beinflicted by a parent upon his child byexcessive chastisement.
ii. It is mitigating when the offensecommitted is less serious physicalinjuries or slight physical injuries, if theoffended party is a relative of a lowerdegree.
iii. It is aggravating if the offended party is
a relative of a higher degree of theoffender.
c) When the crime is homicide or murder,relationship is aggravatingeven if the victimof the crime is a relative of a lower degree.
d) In rape, relationship is aggravatingwhere astepfather raped his stepdaughter or in acase where a father raped his own daughter.
3. In crimes against chastity, like acts oflasciviousness (Art. 336), relationship is always
aggravating, regardless of whether the offenderis a relative of a higher or lower degree of theoffended party.
When the qualification given to the crime isderived from the relationship between theoffender and the offended party, it is neithermitigating nor aggravating, because it isinseparablefrom and inherentin the offense.(e.g. parricide, adultery and concubinage).
ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES Thosewhich must be taken into consideration asaggravating or mitigating according to thenature and effects of the crime and the otherconditions attending its commission.
8/12/2019 Ateneo Crim Mem Aid
25/124
QuickTime and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Criminal Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEOCENTRALBAROPERATIONS2007
Page 25 of 174
INTOXICATION
When Intoxication Mitigating And WhenAggravat ing:1. Mitigating
i. If intoxication is not habitual, orii. If intoxication is not subsequent to the plantocommit a felony.
2. Aggravat ingi. If intoxication is habitual, orii. If it is intentional (subsequent to the plan to
commit a felony).
To Be Entitled To The Mitigating Circumstance OfIntoxication, It Must Be Shown:
1. That at the time of the commission of thecriminal act, the accused has taken suchquantity of alcoholic drinks as to blur hisreason and deprive him of a certain degreeof control, and
2. That such intoxication is not habitual, orsubsequent to the plan to commit the felony.
To be mitigating, the accuseds state ofintoxication must be proved. Onceintoxication is established by satisfactoryevidence, in the absence of proof to thecontrary, it is presumed to be non-habitual orunintentional.
INSTRUCTION OR EDUCATION As an alternative circumstance it does not
refer only to literacy but more to the level ofintelligence of the accused.
Refers to the lack or presence of sufficientintelligence and knowledge of the fullsignificance of ones acts.
Low degree of instruction and educationor lack of it is generally mitigating. Highdegree of instruction and education isaggravating, when the offender tookadvantage of his learning in committing thecrime.
GENERAL RULE: Lack of sufficient education is
mitigating.EXCEPTIONS:
1. Crimes against property (e.g. arson,estafa, theft, robbery)
2. Crimes against chastity, and3. Treason because love of country
should be a natural feeling of everycitizen, however unlettered or unculturedhe may be.
TITLE TWO
PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE FORFELONIES
ART.16.WHO ARE CRIMINALLY LIABLE
Note that accessories are not liable for lightfelonies. REASON: In the commission of lightfelonies, the social wrong as well as theindividual prejudice is so small that penalsanction is unnecessary.
The classification of the offenders as principal,accomplice or an accessory is essential under
the RPC. The classification maybe applied tospecial laws only if the latter provides for thesame graduated penalties as those providedunder the RPC.
There Are Two Parties In All Crimes:
1. Active subject(the criminal) Art. 16 enumerates the active subjects
of the crime.2. Passive subject(the injured party)
Is the holder of the injured right: theman, the juristic person, the group, andthe State.
Note: Only natural persons can be theactive subject of crime because of thehighly personal nature of the criminalresponsibility.
However, corporation and partnershipcan be a passive subject of a crime.
GENERALLY: Corpses and animalscannot be passive subjects becausethey have no rights that may beinjured.
EXCEPTION: Under Art. 253, thecrime of defamation may becommitted if