Post on 20-Sep-2020
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
María Moncada SaracibarOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVammoncadas@funge.uva.es
Programas Europeos de Ciencia ExcelenteDoctorados y Postdoc (MSCA ITN y RISE)
Formando a los líderes del futuro.
Contexto europeo ¿Qué tipo de MSCA es la mejor para mi? Novedades MSCA: 2018 MSCA criterios MSCA ITN 2018
(Descanso café) Proceso de Evaluación Cómo escribir una buena propuesta Lessons Learnt de anteriores ediciones
Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) ITN y RISE 2018
Organiza: Financia :
Información práctica
Global Objetives Excellent Science Pillar – Horizon 2020 (6.162M€) Bottom-up approach Funding based on Unit Costs Support of the at all
stages Mobility is a key requirement: triple “i” dimension Adquisition of new and complementary skills Training Strong industry participation Excellent working conditions, gender balance and
open recruitment Emphasis on communication and public
engagement activities
3
I. MSCA Objectives
CHE Chemistry
SOC Social
Sciences and Humanities
ECO Economic Sciences
ENG Information Science and Engineering
ENV Environmental and
Geosciences
LIF Life
Sciences
MAT Mathematics
PHY Physics
Marie Sklodowska
Curie Actions (MSCA)
Training
Mobility Career
Excellent Science Pillar – Horizon 2020 (6,1M€)
Bottom-up approach
Funding based on Unit Costs
Support of the researchers´career path at all stages
Mobility is a key requirement: triple “i” dimension
Adquisition of new and complementary skills
Strong industry participation
Excellent working conditions, gender balance and open recruitment
Emphasis on communication and public engagement activities
EU CAREER TRACK
2-7 YEARS AFTER PhD(ER)
0-2 YEARS AFTER PhD
(ER)
7-12 YEARS AFTER PhD
(ER)
VERY EXPERIENCED RESEARCHER
S (ER)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2-7 YEARS AFTER PhD
STARTING GRANT
7-12 YEARS AFTER PhD
CONSOLIDATOR GRANT
ADVANCED GRANT
10 YEARS TRACK RECORD
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
¿Qué tipo de MSCA es la más adecuada para mi?
Eligible researchers
¿Qué tipos de MSCA hay?
EF-RIEF-SEGF
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para mi?
BEFOREPhD<4 YEARS
EXPERIENCEDIN R&D(ESR)
2-7 YEARSAFTERPhD(ER)
0-2 YEARSAFTER PhD
(ER)
7-12 YEARSAFTER PhD
(ER)
VERYEXPERIENCEDRESEARCHERS
(ER)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
MARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE ACTIONS
FET
2-7 YEARSAFTER PhD
STARTINGGRANT
7-12YEARSAFTER PhD
CONSOLIDATORGRANT
ERC
ADVANCEDGRANT
10 YEARSTRACKRECORD
Living allowance: for early-stage researchers (ITN): 39 240/year
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para mi?
BEFOREPhD<4 YEARS
EXPERIENCEDIN R&D(ESR)
2-7 YEARSAFTERPhD(ER)
0-2 YEARSAFTER PhD
(ER)
7-12 YEARSAFTER PhD
(ER)
VERYEXPERIENCEDRESEARCHERS
(ER)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
MARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE ACTIONS
FET
2-7 YEARSAFTER PhD
STARTINGGRANT
7-12YEARSAFTER PhD
CONSOLIDATORGRANT
ERC
ADVANCEDGRANT
10 YEARSTRACKRECORD
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para ti?
Living allowance for experienced researchers (IF): 58 560 EUR/year
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para ti?
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para ti?
¿Cuál de las MSCA es la mejor para ti?
https://youtu.be/S-fDoxerKeA
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
Novedades MSCA 2018
Novedades 2018
Update of Unit Costs: Living Allowances Update of Country Corrector Coefficient: ES
goes from 97,6 to 95,4 Revision of long-term residency rule for third-
country researchers (more flexible) Special needs allowance for disabled
researchers – as of Q1 2019 Budget increase notably for ITN and IF
6
I. News WP 2018-2020
GENERAL ASPECTS • Update of Unit Costs: Living Allowances
• Update of Country Corrector Coefficient: ES goes from 97,6 to 95,4
• Revision of long-term residency rule for third-country researchers (more flexible)
• Special needs allowance for disabled researchers – as of Q1 2019
• Budget increase notably for ITN and IF
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions:criterios
MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)I. MSCA Individual Fellowships (IF)
8
Coming to / moving within Europe (12-24 months) For fellows from Europe going to Third countries and returning (12 to 24 TC + 12 months return to Europe)
NEWS WP 2018-2020 • Part-Time allowed • Flexible initial phase GF • CAR Panel: up to 3 years
Objective: Enhance the creative and innovative potential of experienced researchers by providing them with opportunities to acquire new knowledge, work on research projects in a European context or outside Europe
MSCA RISE (Research and Innovation Staff Exchange)
MSCA CoFUND
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
MSCA ITN 2018
2018-2020 MSCA Calls: 2.871M€ / 6.162M€ H2020
I. Calls MSCA 2018/2020: 2.871,88M€
5
Call ID Call Opens Call Deadline Budget (Mio EUR)
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019 H2020-MSCA-ITN-2020
12-10-2017
13-09-2018
12-10-2019
17-01-2018
15-01-2019
09-01-2020
442.00
470.00
525.00
H2020-MSCA-IF-2018 H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 H2020-MSCA-IF-2020
12-04-2018
11-04-2019
08-04-2020
12-09-2018
11-09-2019
09-11-2020
273.00
295.62
325.00
H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 H2020-MSCA-RISE-2019 H2020-MSCA-RISE-2020
22-11-2018
04-12-2018
05-12-2019
21-03-2018
02-04-2019
07-04-2020
80.00
80.00
80.00
H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2018 H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2019 H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2020
12-04-2018
04-04-2019
08-04-2020
27-09-2018
26-09-2019
29-09-2020
80.00
90.00
100.00
H2020-MSCA-NIGHT-2018 H2020-MSCA-NIGHT-2020
07-11-2017
08-10-2019
14-02-2018
08-01-2020
12.00
08.00
MSCA ITN 2018
• Joint research training/ doctoral programmes implemented by partnerships of universities, research institutions, businesses, SMEs and other socio-economic actors from different countries across Europe (and beyond).
• Focus on scientific/ technological knowledge through research on individual/ personalised projects
• Exposure to non-academic sector
• Networking activities
• Transferable skills training e.g. communication, research management, IP, ethics, societal outreach, entrepreneurship
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: Objectives
Train a new generation of creative, entrepreneurial and innovative researchers, able to face current and future challenges and to convert knowledge and ideas into products and services for economic and social benefit. Raise the excellence and Structuring of European Doctoral Programmes
11
¿Cómo son los proyectos ITN?
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: Main characteristics
19
European Training Networks
(ETN)
European Industrial Doctorates
(EID)
European Joint Doctorates
(EJD)
• Duration of projects: maximum 4 years
• Recruitment of researchers: min. 3 months – max. 36 months
• ITN is not a research project, it is a research training programme
• Evaluation: Separate multidisciplinary panels for EID and EJD
• Consortium agreement compulsory for all modes
• Recruitment of researchers: min. 3 months – max. 36 months
¿Qué tiene que tener una ITN?Research and Hands on Training
• Seminars and workshop • Local PhD training • Summer School
Additional Training (Transferable Skills) • Finding funding possibilities// How to write a proposal • Project managemente // Financial issues • Knowledge Transfer: patents, IPR….// Entrepreneurship • Scientific Articles writing // Public Talks
And more
• Secondments, Collaboration • Communication and Public Engagement • Public Engagement • Final users collaboration
II. MSCA – ITN 2017: What is an ITN about?
24
Innovative doctoral training
Research Excellence Attractive institutional
environment Quality Assurance International Networking Interdisciplinary research
options Exposure to industry and
other employment sectors Transferable skills training
• http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/research_policies/Principles_for_Innovative_Doctoral_Training.pdf• http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/research_policies/SGHRM_IDTP_Report_Final.pdf
Excellence section in ITN 2018
Researcher DevelopmentFramework
Researcher DevelopmentFramework
Career Development Plan
ITN Key eligiblity
II. MSCA - ITN 2018: Key Concepts
13
• Research experience
• Mobility rule
Reseachers´
elegibility
• Implementation modes
Consortium
elegibility
MSCA- ITN- ETN
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Count ry 1
Count ry 2 Count ry 3
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
• Minimum 3 beneficiaries
• 3 countries (MS/AC)
• Each beneficiary must recruit and host at least one researcher at its premises
• Participation of non-academic sector considered essential
Max. 540 Re/ Mo for the network: 15 ESR
Secondments up to 30% of the researcher recruitment period
Joint supervision encouraged
Max. 40% of total budget to one country
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: ETN mode
Academia Non-
academia
European Training Networks
(ETN)
20
NEWS 2018: For academic institutions not offering doctoral degrees, Universities should be included as P.O.
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Count ry 1
Count ry 2 Count ry 3
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
• Minimum 3 beneficiaries
• 3 countries (MS/AC)
• Each beneficiary must recruit and host at least one researcher at its premises
• Participation of non-academic sector considered essential
Max. 540 Re/ Mo for the network: 15 ESR
Secondments up to 30% of the researcher recruitment period
Joint supervision encouraged
Max. 40% of total budget to one country
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: ETN mode
Academia Non-
academia
European Training Networks
(ETN)
20
NEWS 2018: For academic institutions not offering doctoral degrees, Universities should be included as P.O.
MSCA- ITN-EJDMinim. 3 beneficiaries 3 MS/AC
All entitled to award doctoral degrees
Additional beneficiaries or partner organisations from any country, sector and discipline;
Participation of non-academic sector encouraged
Mandatory enrollment of ESRs in the joint doctoral programme
Mandatory provision of joint, double or multiple degrees
Max. 540 ESR/ Mo (15 ESR)
Joint governance structure, Consortium Agreement
Max. 40% of total budget to one country
II. MSCA- ITN 2018: EJD mode
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Count ry 1
Count ry 2 Count ry 3
Academia
Academia
Academia
Academia Non-
academia
European Joint Doctorates
(EJD)
25
NEWS CALL 2018
Joint degree always within Europe or with European beneficiary (2/ 3 PhD recruited)
Template for Institutional commitment letters
Minim. 3 beneficiaries 3 MS/AC
All entitled to award doctoral degrees
Additional beneficiaries or partner organisations from any country, sector and discipline;
Participation of non-academic sector encouraged
Mandatory enrollment of ESRs in the joint doctoral programme
Mandatory provision of joint, double or multiple degrees
Max. 540 ESR/ Mo (15 ESR)
Joint governance structure, Consortium Agreement
Max. 40% of total budget to one country
II. MSCA- ITN 2018: EJD mode
Academia Non-academia
Academia Non-academia
Count ry 1
Count ry 2 Count ry 3
Academia
Academia
Academia
Academia Non-
academia
European Joint Doctorates
(EJD)
25
NEWS CALL 2018
Joint degree always within Europe or with
European beneficiary (2/ 3 PhD recruited)
Template for Institutional commitment letters
MSCA-ITN-EIDII. An EID example
Academia Non-academia
European Industrial Doctorates
(EID)
24
ITN 2018: Aspectos generalesSECONDMENTS
ETN: Up to 30% of the recruitment period (max. 10,8 months) .
During secondments researchers keep their contracts with the sending institution, which also pays their travel and subsistence expenses NEW: 6 months or less = accommodation + travel to be paid by RTN Unit Cost, compulsory
Researchers receive supervision and training at the premises of the receiving beneficiary or partner organisation.
26
II. ITN 2018: horizontal issues
CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT
Compulsory in all modes, prior to G.A. The final C.A must be provided to REA as a management deliverable, within 2 months of the start of the project Private agreement between consortium members to agree on recruitment strategy, selection, supervision aspects, management of funds, IPR, etc. http://www.desca-2020.eu/ + LERU + KOWI
SECONDMENTS ETN: Up to 30% of the recruitment period (max. 10,8 months) .
During secondments researchers keep their contracts with the sending institution, which also pays their travel and subsistence expenses NEW: 6 months or less = accommodation + travel to be paid by RTN Unit Cost, compulsory
Researchers receive supervision and training at the premises of the receiving beneficiary or partner organisation.
26
II. ITN 2018: horizontal issues
CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT
Compulsory in all modes, prior to G.A. The final C.A must be provided to REA as a management deliverable, within 2 months of the start of the project Private agreement between consortium members to agree on recruitment strategy, selection, supervision aspects, management of funds, IPR, etc. http://www.desca-2020.eu/ + LERU + KOWI
Financiación ITN 2018
MSCA
RESEARCHER UNIT COST
[PERSON/ MONTH]
INSTITUTIONAL UNIT COST
[PERSON/ MONTH]
Living allowance*
Mobility allowance
Family allowance
Research, training and networking costs
Management and overheads
ITN 3.270 600 500 1.800 1.200
RESEARCHER UNIT COST Living Allowance: • Country coefficient correction applies. NEW: ES: 95,4% • Gross EU contribution (then reduction of taxes, Social
Security, company taxes…) Family Allowance: determined at the recruitment date
INSTITUCIONAL UNIT COST Research, training and networking costs: • purchase of materials, meetings, travel to
workshops, organisation of training courses, secondments, fees…
Management and overheads: • Indirect costs to be used by institution • Posible redistribution between members
27
II. MSCA ITN 2018: financing
Overview TableII. MSCA – ITN 2017: Overview table
32
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
Cómo formar el mejor partenariado:• Perfil por complementariedad• Perfil por tipo de participación• Perfil por actividad
(académico/no)• Perfil por País
Beneficiario vs Partner Organization
II. ITN Consortia: Beneficiaries vs. Partner Organisations
16
Beneficiary
• Signs of the Grant Agreement with the EC • Receives funds directly from the EC • Recruits researchers • Hosts researchers in their premises / offer
secondments, training activities • Participates in the Supervisory Board
Partner Organisation
• No contractual link with EC, no EC funds • No recruitment of researchers • Hosts researchers in their premises / offer
secondments, training activities, Knowledge transfer…
• Participates in the Supervisory Board
All Modes ITN: Partner Organisations need to include a Letter of Commitment (section 7 – Template B) European Joint Doctorates (EJD): Beneficiaries Letter of Commitment template (annex 6)
ACADEMIC SECTOR
• public or private High Education Institutions (HEI) awarding academic degrees
• public or private non-profit research organisations whose principal mission is research
• International European interest organisations (IEIOs) http://eiroforum.org/
NON –ACADEMIC SECTOR
any other socio-economic actor not included in the academic sector definition (i.e: SMEs, enterprises, NGOs, hospitals, government bodies, museums…)
17
II. ITN Consortia: 2 different Sectors Perfiles de los Socios
Perfil de los socios por Países
II. ITN Consortia: Country participation
* Iceland, Norway, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey, Israel, Moldova, Switzerland, Faroe Islands, Ukraine, Tunisia, Georgia, Armenia (as of November 2016)
18
28 Member States (MS) + ultraperiferic territories
16 Associated Countries to H2020 (AC) *
Eligible to participate and receive funds
Third Countries: Not MS / Not AC
A. Eligible to receive funding: established in Annex A WP B. Countries not eligible for EU funding How does it work in ITN: • Once minimun requirements, TC as beneficiaries (A) • But tipically, TC are Partner Organisations (A – B) • TC not eligible for funding (B) can only participate as P.O
Información práctica
Organiza: Financia :
OPEUVAOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVaPlaza Santa Cruz 5, bajo,
47002- Valladolid
Proceso de Evaluación MSCA ITN 2018
Proceso de Evaluación 2018
Call ID Opens Closes Budget
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 12-10-2017 17-01-2018 ETN: 375.00 EID: 32.00 EJD: 35.00
Call ITN 2018: 442.00M€
4
I. Timing MSCA – ITN 2018
Publication 12/10/2017
Closing 17/01/2018
Proposals evaluation
March 2018
Evaluation Results
June 2018
GA signature
September 2018
Timetable for the H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 Call (8 months TTG)
Call ID Opens Closes Budget
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 12-10-2017 17-01-2018 ETN: 375.00 EID: 32.00 EJD: 35.00
Call ITN 2018: 442.00M€
4
I. Timing MSCA – ITN 2018
Publication 12/10/2017
Closing 17/01/2018
Proposals evaluation
March 2018
Evaluation Results
June 2018
GA signature
September 2018
Timetable for the H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 Call (8 months TTG)
Call ID Opens Closes Budget
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 12-10-2017 17-01-2018 ETN: 375.00 EID: 32.00 EJD: 35.00
Call ITN 2018: 442.00M€
30
II. Timing and evaluation MSCA – ITN 2018
Publication 12/10/2017
Closing 17/01/2018
Proposals evaluation
March 2018
Evaluation Results
June 2018
GA signature
September 2018
Timetable for the H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 Call (8 months TTG)
Criteria W eight Priority
( ex.aequo)
Excellence 50% 1
Impact 30% 2
Implementation 20% 3
Evaluation Criteria
Overall Threshold 70% No individual overall
Ratio de Éxito 2016/2017
29
II. S
ucce
ss R
ates
201
6/20
17
Nota de corte ITN 2015-2017
31
II. ITN Cut-off notes and number of funded projects
ITN 2015 ITN 2016 ITN 2017
CHE 93,4 (9) 94 (9) 94,8 (12)
ECO 92,4 (1) 98,8 (1) 91,4 (1)
ENG 94,4 (24) 93 (25) 94,4 (28)
ENV 92,8 (11) 95,4 (9) 95,6 (12)
LIF 95,2 (24) 93,8 (26) 95,2 (28)
MAT 88,4 (1) 85,4 (1) 94,2 (1)
PHY 95,2 (6) 93,6 (6) 96,2 (7)
SOC 95,2 (7) 97,4 (8) 97,4 (9)
EJD 92,6 (8) 94 (8) 92,8 (9)
EID 92 (15) 92 (16) 91,4 (20)
Proceso de Evaluación en remotoI. MSCA: Evaluation Process
5
FULL REMOTE EVALUATION • 3 evaluators per proposal; • 2 Vice-Chairs (VCs) of which 1 is
rapporteur, and 1 cross-reader; • SEP Hands-on Training for VCs; • Improved briefing for experts:
web-briefing (unconscious bias added), Q&A chat sessions, evaluators guide, SEP guidance movie;
• SEP workflow and functionalities adjusted to ease the remote consensus discussion;
• Minority views: Specific slots for teleconferences will be foreseen in order to solve critical cases remotely, before the central phase.
Scoring Propousal
Full scoring scale consistent with the comments
6
I. Evaluation: Scoring the proposal
6
ITN 2018: Evaluation Panels
Documentación para preparar la propuesta
ADMINISTRATIVE FORMS
FORM A FORM B
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: 2 DOCUMENTS
Form Title
Section 1 General information on the proposal
Section 2 Data from the participating institutions
Section 3 Budget
Section 4 Ethical aspects
Section 5 Information on Partner Organisations
1. Excellence 2. Impact 3. Implementation
Page limit: 30 No limit per section
DOCUMENT 1
DOCUMENT 2
4. Gantt Chart 5. Capacities of the Participating Organisations (tables) 6. Ethical Aspects 7. Letters of Commitment
Submission S tructure
MSCA-ITN-2017
Evaluation Criteria
• Overall Threshold 70%
• No individual overall
Criteria W eight Priority
( ex.aequo)
Excellence 50% 1
Impact 30% 2
Implementation 20% 3
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: Evaluation
9
DOCUMENT 1 ( 34 pages total)
Start Page (1 page) Table of Contents (1 page) List of participants (2 pages) 1. Excellence 2. Impact 3. Implementation
Page limit: 30 No limit per section
DOCUMENT 2
4. Gantt Chart 5. Capacities of the Participating Organisations (tables) 6. Ethical Aspects 7. Letters of Commitment
Technical Proposal (Part B)
Part A (Administrative Part ) Technical Proposal (Part B)
Algunos consejos para una propuesta ganadora
Read the Call Documents:
Work Programme, Guide for Applicants, Horizontal Issues: Gender / Ethic Issues, etc, FAQ
Use the official template:
Respond to all criteria and sub-criteria
“A picture is worth a thousand words”: use visuals to provide global information at a glance.
Ensure coloured diagrams are readable when printed
Be aware of all criteria weight, it is not all about Excellence!
Ask for support:
European Projects Offices / Transfer of Technology Offices / HR Departments …
National Contact Points
Do not leave it for the last minute!
Get familiar with the Participants´Portal
Upload a version, you will be able to rewrite it.
II. General tips to submit a good proposal
33
Part B: Excellence1.1 Quality, innovative aspects and credibility of the research programme (including inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
13
Are gender aspects relevant for the research topic?
‡ If yes: are these aspects stated clearly?
Check: Is the role of the non-academic
partner for the training well described?
Check for three general training aspects: 1) Scientific training - "through research" --
> the sub project of the ESR 2) Additional scientific training, including
those in the network 3) Training in soft, transferable or
complementary skills
Can you easily identify
interdisciplinary & intersectoral
aspects?
If appropriate: Are gender aspects part of
the training programme?
Is the relevance of the research topic stated
clearly? Check if the link between the individual ESR projects and the
overall research programme is made
clear
Diving in Part B… Meet the Evaluation Criteria
CRITERIA 1 "Excellence" (Chapter 1)
1.1 Quality, innovative aspects and credibility of the research programme (including inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
1.2 Quality and innovative aspects of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
For Chapter 1 – 3 in general: Check if the “triple-i-dimension" is easy to
identify in the presentation of the research and training
programme: is it interdisciplinary –
intersectoral?
13
Are gender aspects relevant for the research topic?
‡ If yes: are these aspects stated clearly?
Check: Is the role of the non-academic
partner for the training well described?
Check for three general training aspects: 1) Scientific training - "through research" --
> the sub project of the ESR 2) Additional scientific training, including
those in the network 3) Training in soft, transferable or
complementary skills
Can you easily identify
interdisciplinary & intersectoral
aspects?
If appropriate: Are gender aspects part of
the training programme?
Is the relevance of the research topic stated
clearly? Check if the link between the individual ESR projects and the
overall research programme is made
clear
Diving in Part B… Meet the Evaluation Criteria
CRITERIA 1 "Excellence" (Chapter 1)
1.1 Quality, innovative aspects and credibility of the research programme (including inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
1.2 Quality and innovative aspects of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
For Chapter 1 – 3 in general: Check if the “triple-i-dimension" is easy to
identify in the presentation of the research and training
programme: is it interdisciplinary –
intersectoral?
1.2 Quality and innovative aspects of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
15
II. Excellence section (ITN 2018): what goes under 1.2.
1.2 Quality and innovative aspects of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, intersectoral and, where appropriate, gender aspects)
RRI and gender aspects in 1.2 sectionII. MSCA ITN 2018: RRI aspects
Engagement
Science Education Ethics
Open Access
Gender Equality
16
1.3 Quality of Supervision (qualification and supervision experience, joint supervision arrangements)
1.4 Quality of the proposed interaction between the participating organisations
This chapter should read well together with
partner information in chapter 5
Check that a) qualification of the supervisors and b) their
experience in supervision is clearly stated.
Check if the exposure of the ESRs to different research
environments is well described.
Check the explanation:
Can you easily identify the contribution of all participating
organisations to the research/ training programme?
Are all organisations included and
represented adequately?
Tip: Sometimes tables or figures for illustration can be helpful
Is it clear that all organisations are qualified for the tasks they are
assigned for?
Are the synergies easy to identify?
1.3 Quality of Supervision (qualification and supervision experience, joint supervision arrangements)
1.4 Quality of the proposed interaction between the participating organisations
Good to have „Supervisor teams“, also for ETNs ‡ e.g. one from each
sector (A/N-A) This chapter should read well together with
partner information in chapter 5
Check that a) qualification of the supervisors and b) their
experience in supervision is clearly stated.
Check if the exposure of the ESRs to different research
environments is well described.
Check the explanation:
Can you easily identify the contribution of all participating
organisations to the research/ training programme?
Are all organisations included and
represented adequately?
Tip: Sometimes tables or figures for illustration can be helpful
Is it clear that all organisations are qualified for the tasks they are
assigned for?
Are the synergies easy to identify?
1.3 Quality of Supervision (qualification and supervision experience, joint supervision arrangements)
1.4 Quality of the proposed interaction between the participating organisations
Good to have „Supervisor teams“, also for ETNs ‡ e.g. one from each
sector (A/N-A)
Impact: part B: three different levels
19
II. Impact section (ITN 2018) DOCUMENT 1
• Increased set of skills (research-related and transferable ones), leading to improved employability and career prospects both in and outside academia
• Increase in higher impact R&I output and more knowledge and ideas converted into products and services
RESEARCHER LEVEL
• Enhanced cooperation and better transfer of knowledge between sectors and disciplines
• Improvement in the quality of training programmes and supervision arrangements
• Increased internationalisation of participating organisations
ORGANISATION LEVEL
• Increase in international, interdisciplinary and intersectoral mobility of researchers in Europe
• Increase in Europe´s attractiveness as a leading research destination, accompanied by a rise in the number of talented researchers attracted and retained from abroad
• More structured and innovative doctoral training, enhanced implementation of the European Charter and Code and the EU Principles for Innovative Doctoral Training
SYSTEM LEVEL
Part B: Impact2.1 Enhancing the career perspectives and employability of researchers and contribution to their skills development
2.2 Contribution to structuring doctoral / early-stage research training at the European level and to strengthening European innovation capacity, including the potential for: •Contribution of the non-academic sector to the doctoral / research training, as appropriate to the implementation mode (ETN/EJD/EID) and research field • Contribution to developing sustainable joint doctoral degree structures (for EJD only)
2.3 Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results •− Dissemination of the research results •− Exploitation of results and intellectual property
Check for clear division between target groups, methods and tools for
communication and outreach?
Check: Are there concrete
plans in the tables?
Check if there are exploitation and
dissemination strategies -What will happen with the results? What would be the next step? To whom can it
be useful?
Check: is there communication
and public engagement
strategy in place?
2.3 Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results
− Dissemination of the research results − Exploitation of results and intellectual property
2.4 Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences
− Communication and public engagement strategy of the project
Check if there are concrete plans for dissemination and exploitation and the tables?
Check how Open Access will be implemented?
Check for short description of background and IP results?
Include a plan for IP and exploitation as a deliverable at
the beginning of the project. Mention that details will be
part of the CA
Check if Open Research Data will be implemented?
(if applicable)
For chapter 2.3 and 2.4: remember the statement
on dissemination, exploitation and
communication from Charter & Code.
Check for clear division between target groups, methods and tools for
communication and outreach?
Check: Are there concrete
plans in the tables?
Check if there are exploitation and
dissemination strategies -What will happen with the results? What would be the next step? To whom can it
be useful?
Check: is there communication
and public engagement
strategy in place?
2.3 Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the
project results
− Dissemination of the research results − Exploitation of results and intellectual property
2.4 Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences
− Communication and public engagement strategy of the project
Check if there are concrete plans for dissemination and exploitation and the tables?
Check how Open Access will be implemented?
Check for short description of background and IP results?
Include a plan for IP and exploitation as a deliverable at
the beginning of the project. Mention that details will be
part of the CA
Check if Open Research Data will be implemented?
(if applicable)
For chapter 2.3 and 2.4: remember the statement
on dissemination, exploitation and
communication from Charter & Code.
II. MSCA ITN 2018: sections 2.3 / 2.4 - RRI aspects
Engagement
Science Education Ethics Open
Access Gender Equality
22 23
Communication Dissemination
About the project and results Communication requires a clear and accessible language
About results only
Multiple audiences beyond the project's own community (include the media and the public) Possible Activities: Marie Sklodowska Curie Ambassadors, Workshop Days, Open Doors, Public Talks, articles, E-newsletters, multimedia releases, European Researchers´ Night, EC Events, conferences, Marie Curie Alumni Assocation (MCAA), MSCA “Fellow of the Week” on Facebook
Audiences that may use the results in their own work e.g. peers (scientific or the project's own community), industry and other commercial actors, professional organisations, policymakers
Inform and reach out to society, show the benefits of research
Enable use and uptake of results OPEN ACCESS and OPEN DATA Outline plans to exploit any IP arising from the programme
Grant Agreement art. 38.1
Grant Agreement art. 29
Starts at the outset of the project When results are available
II. Impact section (ITN 2018): what goes under 2.3/2.4.
2.4 Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences
− Communication and public engagement strategy of the project
Check for clear division between target groups, methods and tools for
communication and outreach?
Check: Are there concrete
plans in the tables?
Check if there are exploitation and
dissemination strategies -What will happen with the results? What would be the next step? To whom can it
be useful?
Check: is there communication
and public engagement
strategy in place?
2.3 Quality of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the
project results
− Dissemination of the research results − Exploitation of results and intellectual property
2.4 Quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences
− Communication and public engagement strategy of the project
Check if there are concrete plans for dissemination and exploitation and the tables?
Check how Open Access will be implemented?
Check for short description of background and IP results?
Include a plan for IP and exploitation as a deliverable at
the beginning of the project. Mention that details will be
part of the CA
Check if Open Research Data will be implemented?
(if applicable)
For chapter 2.3 and 2.4: remember the statement
on dissemination, exploitation and
communication from Charter & Code.
II. MSCA ITN 2018: sections 2.3 / 2.4 - RRI aspects
Engagement
Science Education Ethics Open
Access Gender Equality
22
23
Communication Dissemination
About the project and results Communication requires a clear and accessible language
About results only
Multiple audiences beyond the project's own community (include the media and the public) Possible Activities: Marie Sklodowska Curie Ambassadors, Workshop Days, Open Doors, Public Talks, articles, E-newsletters, multimedia releases, European Researchers´ Night, EC Events, conferences, Marie Curie Alumni Assocation (MCAA), MSCA “Fellow of the Week” on Facebook
Audiences that may use the results in their own work e.g. peers (scientific or the project's own community), industry and other commercial actors, professional organisations, policymakers
Inform and reach out to society, show the benefits of research
Enable use and uptake of results OPEN ACCESS and OPEN DATA Outline plans to exploit any IP arising from the programme
Grant Agreement art. 38.1
Grant Agreement art. 29
Starts at the outset of the project When results are available
II. Impact section (ITN 2018): what goes under 2.3/2.4.
Part B: Implementation3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources (including awarding of doctoral degrees for EID and EJD)
17
Wording/ numbering etc. should match easily the description
from previous chapters. Check if this is coherent.
The network organization
should fit to the project, but
„better keep it simple“!
Check: Are all project participants (beneficiaries AND partner
organisations) must be represented in the Supervisory Board
Tip: It is good to include an representative of the ESRs
Check recruitment procedure especially Recruitment related:
− Job posting (Euraxess mandatory)
− Open, merit based − Selection of the ESRs − Decision making − Equal opportunities
(gender, nationality, religion…)
− etc.
Even though not necessary for the proposal, but might be relevant to
some countries due to doctoral study regulations: how can a 4th year (if applicable) be financed?
Tip: It can help to use charts etc. to explain in detail for example the
flow of documents, the decision making process, the selection
process, the consortium structure etc.
If charts etc. are used: check if these are embedded in the text.
CRITERIA 3 “Implementation” (Chapter 3)
3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources (including awarding of doctoral degrees for EID and EJD)
3.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD)
− Network organisation and management structure, including financial management strategy, strategy for dealing with scientific misconduct
− Joint governing structure (mandatory for EID and EJD actions) − EJD: joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures − Supervisory board − Recruitment Strategy − Progress monitoring − Risk management at Consortium level − Intellectual Property rights − Gender aspects (Recruitment, decision-making within the action − Data-management plan, if applicable
3.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD)
17
Wording/ numbering etc. should match easily the description
from previous chapters. Check if this is coherent.
The network organization
should fit to the project, but
„better keep it simple“!
Check: Are all project participants (beneficiaries AND partner
organisations) must be represented in the Supervisory Board
Tip: It is good to include an representative of the ESRs
Check recruitment procedure especially Recruitment related:
− Job posting (Euraxess mandatory)
− Open, merit based − Selection of the ESRs − Decision making − Equal opportunities
(gender, nationality, religion…)
− etc.
Even though not necessary for the proposal, but might be relevant to
some countries due to doctoral study regulations: how can a 4th year (if applicable) be financed?
Tip: It can help to use charts etc. to explain in detail for example the
flow of documents, the decision making process, the selection
process, the consortium structure etc.
If charts etc. are used: check if these are embedded in the text.
CRITERIA 3 “Implementation” (Chapter 3)
3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources (including awarding of doctoral degrees for EID and EJD)
3.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD)
− Network organisation and management structure, including financial management strategy, strategy for dealing with scientific misconduct
− Joint governing structure (mandatory for EID and EJD actions) − EJD: joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures − Supervisory board − Recruitment Strategy − Progress monitoring − Risk management at Consortium level − Intellectual Property rights − Gender aspects (Recruitment, decision-making within the action − Data-management plan, if applicable
17
Wording/ numbering etc. should match easily the description
from previous chapters. Check if this is coherent.
The network organization
should fit to the project, but
„better keep it simple“!
Check: Are all project participants (beneficiaries AND partner
organisations) must be represented in the Supervisory Board
Tip: It is good to include an representative of the ESRs
Check recruitment procedure especially Recruitment related:
− Job posting (Euraxess mandatory)
− Open, merit based − Selection of the ESRs − Decision making − Equal opportunities
(gender, nationality, religion…)
− etc.
Even though not necessary for the proposal, but might be relevant to
some countries due to doctoral study regulations: how can a 4th year (if applicable) be financed?
Tip: It can help to use charts etc. to explain in detail for example the
flow of documents, the decision making process, the selection
process, the consortium structure etc.
If charts etc. are used: check if these are embedded in the text.
CRITERIA 3 “Implementation” (Chapter 3)
3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources (including awarding of doctoral degrees for EID and EJD)
3.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD)
− Network organisation and management structure, including financial management strategy, strategy for dealing with scientific misconduct
− Joint governing structure (mandatory for EID and EJD actions) − EJD: joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures − Supervisory board − Recruitment Strategy − Progress monitoring − Risk management at Consortium level − Intellectual Property rights − Gender aspects (Recruitment, decision-making within the action − Data-management plan, if applicable
17
Wording/ numbering etc. should match easily the description
from previous chapters. Check if this is coherent.
The network organization
should fit to the project, but
„better keep it simple“!
Check: Are all project participants (beneficiaries AND partner
organisations) must be represented in the Supervisory Board
Tip: It is good to include an representative of the ESRs
Check recruitment procedure especially Recruitment related:
− Job posting (Euraxess mandatory)
− Open, merit based − Selection of the ESRs − Decision making − Equal opportunities
(gender, nationality, religion…)
− etc.
Even though not necessary for the proposal, but might be relevant to
some countries due to doctoral study regulations: how can a 4th year (if applicable) be financed?
Tip: It can help to use charts etc. to explain in detail for example the
flow of documents, the decision making process, the selection
process, the consortium structure etc.
If charts etc. are used: check if these are embedded in the text.
CRITERIA 3 “Implementation” (Chapter 3)
3.1 Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources (including awarding of doctoral degrees for EID and EJD)
3.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including quality management and risk management (with a mandatory joint governing structure for EID and EJD)
− Network organisation and management structure, including financial management strategy, strategy for dealing with scientific misconduct
− Joint governing structure (mandatory for EID and EJD actions) − EJD: joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures − Supervisory board − Recruitment Strategy − Progress monitoring − Risk management at Consortium level − Intellectual Property rights − Gender aspects (Recruitment, decision-making within the action − Data-management plan, if applicable
Ejemplo de una estructura de gestión típica
Supervisory Board External Advisory
Group
ESR Committee
Project Management
Team
Training Committee
Dissemination & Outreach
Committee
Research Coordination Committee
IP & Exploitation Committee
II. Implementation section (ITN 2018)
Example of a Management Structure
28
HRS4R: en la UVa, HR in ExcellenceII. Horizontal Issues: HR Excellence in Research
2 Key Documents: “Charter and Code”
• European Charter for Researchers
• The Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers
http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/brochure_rights/eur_21620_es-en.pdf
HR Excellence in Research (HRS4R)
• Have the organisations implemented it? In the process of obtaining the HR Excellence in Research? Explain it.
• Use the OTM-R toolkit!
http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index.cfm/rights/strategy4Researcher
29
The UVa is working on its HRS4R More information:http://hrs4r.uva.es/
3.3 Appropriateness of the infrastructure of the participating organisations Explain the appropriateness of the infrastructure of each participating organisation, as outlined in Section 5 (Participating Organisations), in light of the tasks allocated to them in the action.
Check if the necessary INFRASTRUCTURE is described
in relation to the TASKS
Check the COMPLEMENTARITY of competences and experiences in
participating organisations
‡ It should be convincing that selected institutions complement eachother and that they are committed to achieve the
objectives.
3.3 Appropriateness of the infrastructure of the participating organisations
Explain the appropriateness of the infrastructure of each participating organisation, as outlined in Section 5 (Participating Organisations), in light of the tasks allocated to them in the action.
3.4 Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations and their
commitment to the programme
Chapter 4 – 6 „Varia“
® Chapter 4: Gantt chart: check if the 30%-Secondment rule is respected ® Chapter 5: Is information provided about the extent of involvement in the action
(percentage of full-time employment per person/beneficiary) ® Chapter 6: If ethical issues ‡ needs to be cross-referenced and matching with
information part A
3.4 Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations and their commitment to the programme
Check if the necessary INFRASTRUCTURE is described
in relation to the TASKS
Check the COMPLEMENTARITY of competences and experiences in
participating organisations
‡ It should be convincing that selected institutions complement eachother and that they are committed to achieve the
objectives.
3.3 Appropriateness of the infrastructure of the participating organisations
Explain the appropriateness of the infrastructure of each participating organisation, as outlined in Section 5 (Participating Organisations), in light of the tasks allocated to them in the action.
3.4 Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations and their commitment to the programme
Chapter 4 – 6 „Varia“
® Chapter 4: Gantt chart: check if the 30%-Secondment rule is respected ® Chapter 5: Is information provided about the extent of involvement in the action
(percentage of full-time employment per person/beneficiary) ® Chapter 6: If ethical issues ‡ needs to be cross-referenced and matching with
information part A
FORM B: Document 2:
Gantt chart: check if the 30% Secondment rule is respected
Capacities of PO: Is information provided about the extent to involvement in the action (percentage of full-time employment per person/beneficiary)
Ethical Aspects: If ethical issues needs to be cross-referenced and matching with information part A
Letters of Commitment
Form B: Ethical AspectsAll proposals will undergo an ethics review
32
• Human Embryos / Foetuses • Humans • Human Cells / Tissues • Protection of Personal Data • Animals • Third Countries • Environmental Protection and safety • Dual Use • Misuse • Other Ethics Issues
Participants have to:
• Identify all potential ethical aspects
• Explain their future management
• Give a detailed explanation at proposal stage
Description on Ethics:
• Ethic Issues Table en part A
• Ethics Self-Assessment en part B
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: Document 2 - Ethical Aspects
Participant Portal H2020 Ethics section: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/ethics_en.htm Ethics issues table-Checklist: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/doc/call/h2020/h2020-msca-itn-2014/1597698-itn_2014_-_ethics_issues_checklist_en.pdf Ethics Guidance http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/doc/call/h2020/h2020-msca-itn-2015/1620147-h2020_-_guidance_ethics_self_assess_en.pdf
Ethics All proposals will undergo an ethics review
32
• Human Embryos / Foetuses • Humans • Human Cells / Tissues • Protection of Personal Data • Animals • Third Countries • Environmental Protection and safety • Dual Use • Misuse • Other Ethics Issues
Participants have to:
• Identify all potential ethical aspects
• Explain their future management
• Give a detailed explanation at proposal stage
Description on Ethics:
• Ethic Issues Table en part A
• Ethics Self-Assessment en part B
II. MSCA – ITN 2018: Document 2 - Ethical Aspects
Participant Portal H2020 Ethics section: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/ethics_en.htm Ethics issues table-Checklist: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/doc/call/h2020/h2020-msca-itn-2014/1597698-itn_2014_-_ethics_issues_checklist_en.pdf Ethics Guidance http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/doc/call/h2020/h2020-msca-itn-2015/1620147-h2020_-_guidance_ethics_self_assess_en.pdf
Ethics
Lesson Learnt: Excellence (50%)• The proposed methodologies are not always well specified and most methodological details
regarding XXX are missing. • Innovation is minimal in the research programme, which is mainly concerning reviewing and applying
existing modelling techniques. References to literature are very limited: state-of-the-art is not supported by evidences.
• Overall description of the training program is not sufficiently detailed and not convincing; schedule, content, and contributors to the various training sessions are minimally described
• The scientific content of the three proposed summer schools is not provided. In particular, no course in XXX is proposed ,although it is a key aspect of the research.
• The supervision arrangements are not described with sufficient detail. The skills and background of the supervisory team is not sufficiently specified. The training experience of the supervisors is insufficiently detailed.
III. Excellence Section: Evaluation Summary Reports 2017
• The proposal presents an innovative research project that focuses on a fundamental issue of increasing relevance in Europe and with clear potential for development.
• The research programme is based on a previous market research that reinforces the credibility of the proposal.
• Gender issues are a central element of the research programme and are adequately included in the proposal.
• The training plan covers international and multidisciplinary approach and offers a well balanced combination of common and specific courses for ESRs to integrate results while offering specific expertise for each of them.
• Commitment of the partners to the programme is strongly demonstrated. Roles and planned interactions are very clearly defined for each academic and non-academic partner. All participants are strongly involved at both individual and network-wide level in the research and training programs.
35
Lesson Learnt: impact (30%)• The rather limited contribution of the non-academic sector to the training program fails to provide a
blend of transferable skills that will significantly improve the ESR employability in the non-academic sector.
• The proposal is not convincing enough on the contribution of the programme to structuring doctoral/early-stage research training at the European level and to strengthening European innovation capacity. The contribution to structuring doctoral/early-stage research training at European level remains limited to a series of citation of major EU policies the research and training program will address.
• The proposal fails to convincingly highlight the innovative and specific added value of this particular ETN towards better structuring European doctoral training, beyond conventional transnational collaborations.
• The proposed outreach activities are described in insufficient detail. They lack originality and interest for wide audiences.
• Measures for scientific dissemination of results are standard and their description is not sufficiently detailed, lacking indication of specific scientific meetings and journals that will be targeted.
• The proposal does not sufficiently analyze job potential related to the research field
III. Impact Section: Evaluation Summary Reports 2017
• The proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results are adequate. The planned blog will trigger useful discussions among the ESRs.
• The consortium will strengthen both the academic and industrial European leadership in XXXX with a high potential for direct as well as longer term valorisation opportunities, thus strengthening European innovation capacity.
• The quality of the proposed measures to communicate the project activities to different target audiences is very good and adequate.
36
Lesson Learnt: implementation (20%)
• Risk management aspects related to potential disputes, human resources issues, and/or handling of potential scientific misconduct are not sufficiently addressed. Scientific risks related to the experimental plan and relative to each ESR are not properly considered.
• The deliverables of the individual ESRs projects are not sufficiently identified and the late time of some secondments may reduce the efficiency of their goals.
• The non-academic partners appear to play a minor role in the program. For instance, the role of partner XXX appears only once, and marginally, in the project of ESR2. As another example, the role of XXX, and the impact of the program in such a large company, is unconvincingly developed.
• The Supervisory Board will be in charge of basically all management procedures related to research, training and possibly communication. No dedicated committees are clearly defined.
• The description of the Work Packages is vague. Expected results and progress indicators for WPs are vaguely discussed and the beneficiaries involved in the research WPs are not clearly allocated to the specific tasks.
• It is not sufficiently elaborated how the joint degree structure EJD) would be expanded beyond in this project.
III. Implementation Section: Evaluation Summary Reports 2017
• All project activities are appropriately considered in the timeline of the Gantt chart.
• The management structures and procedures, including quality management are appropriate to implement the project. Composition, roles and responsibilities of the project participants are clearly outlined.
• The recruitment strategy and selection procedures are sufficiently explained. The recruitment will be conform to principles of the "Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers" considering gender balance and equality.
• The competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organisations are excellent. • The EJD-project and its training section are well grounded on a previous Erasmus-project
37
USEFUL LINKS•Research and Innovation Participants Portal : http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/home.html •Web and Blog Marie Curie Sklodowska-Curie Actions: http://mariecurieactions.blogspot.com.es/ - http://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/msca •European Charter & Code: http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/brochure_rights/eur_21620_es-en.pdf •Human Resource Strategy for Researchers at UVa•http://hrs4r.uva.es/ •EURAXESS Spain: http://www.euraxess.es/ •Oficina Europea MINECO/FECYT: http://eshorizonte2020.es
MSCA Support at UVa
MSCA support in Spain
USEFUL LINKS • Research and Innovation Participants´Portal : http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/home.html • Web and Blog Marie Curie Sklodowska-Curie Actions: http://mariecurieactions.blogspot.com.es/ - http://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/msca
• European Charter & Code: http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/brochure_rights/eur_21620_es-en.pdf
• EURAXESS Spain: http://www.euraxess.es/
• Oficina Europea MINECO/FECYT: http://eshorizonte2020.es
Cristina Gómez
Cristina.gomez@oficinaeuropea.es
Oficina Europea MINECO / FECYT
Jesús Rojo
Jesus.rojo@madrimasd.org
Fundación para el Conocimiento Madri+d
National Contact Points MSCA
38
Organiza: Financia :
María Moncada SaracibarOficina de Proyectos Europeos Universidad de Valladolid
Fundación General de la UVammoncadas@funge.uva.es
Programas Europeos de Ciencia ExcelenteDoctorados y Postdoc (MSCA ITN y RISE)
Formando a los líderes del futuro.