· 2012. 11. 17. · 1160 30' r Quaternary allu Tertiary volcani Mesozoic grani Paleozoic sedim 0...
Transcript of · 2012. 11. 17. · 1160 30' r Quaternary allu Tertiary volcani Mesozoic grani Paleozoic sedim 0...
1160 30' r
Quaternary allu
Tertiary volcani
Mesozoic grani
Paleozoic sedim
0 10
km
N
Geologic 1981.
1160 15' 17
1160 001 17
•.'-!.':; ":'.; :Pahute Mesa - :•
""•Gold Meadows 370151 Stock
c rocks Rain er-". I .- Mesa
tic rocks
entary rocks : -Buckboard
370 00' F[ Mesa
20..• Il*
Jackass Flelf-
-I
-t
360 45° P-
Mercury
map of the Nevada Test Site showing location of Rainier Mesa and Aqueduct Mesa. From Murray,
VQ Q 30 1j10 r
plate 4.2.5.3-1
cfoF-ý
KTable I.--Stdte of stress determined in U]2g tunnel main drift bypass (USBN overcore method)
|•--, nut applicable)
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
"+ degrces a•tcve hoz izo:IUal MPa MPa - degrees below
Principal stresses
"comere~sfon)
SI (minimum) +2.6 ±0.4 N. 680 W. -70
S2 (maximum) +8.5 ±0.5 N. 21" E. +20
S 3 (intermediate) +6.8 ±0.3 N. 830 W. *20W
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertJi.al) coordinate system
(+. compression)
x +3.5 ±0.3 East Horizontal
y +7.7 ±0.5 North Horizontal
*z 6.7 ±0.3 --- Vertical
1/ Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system--
xy +2.0 A0.3 --
T yz *0.3 10.3
zx -0.5 A.0.2
-- eositive or negative sign on shear streas iagnitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X. Y. Z coordinate sy:tera.
State of in situ stress. U12g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-2
K (
(
S1 2.6 14P1a N. 68" W. -7)
S,-BI.ý MI'd N. 21 1. *2
S 6.$ MP1, N. B3' W. 482
VIk I ICAIL
S - I
NOR [Il
Graphical representation of principal stresses. Ul2g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3.-3
(
Table 2.--State of stress determiined in U12e.06 drift (USBM overcore method) 1---. not applicable)
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrees above
Ha Impa horizontal •l~d ~a -degrees below
ho ri ;.: nt a .
Principal stresses
c(o+. compression)
S1 (minimum) +3.7 10.5 N. 880 E. -200
S2 (maximum) +6.6 ±0.5 N. 510 W. -640
S 3 (intermediate) +4.7 ±0.4 N. 40 E. *160
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(+, compression)
0 x *4.0 ±0.4 East Horizontal
o y *4.8 ±0.4 North ilorizontdi
z *6.1 ±0.5 --- Vertical
Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate systeml/
xy -0.2 ±0.3 --
Tyz -0.5 W0.3
z. *0.9 ±0.4
--Vlositive or negative sign o:i shear !;trCe; uxignitude Indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X. Y, Z cooldinatie systren.
State of in situ stress. Ul2e.06 drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-4
Principal stresses
-ompresson)
S1 (minimum) *2.8 -0.4 N. 75* H. *12*
S2 (maximum) *6.9 to.4 N. 40 E. -400
S3 (intermediate) *6.0 W0.4 N. 28* E. +480
Normal stress components in X. Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(i, compression)
x 3.1 0.4 Wast Horizontal
y +6.3 W0.4 North Horizontal
0z *6.2 ±0.3 --- Vertical
Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate systemJ
xy .0.8 W0.3
T yz -0.6 t0.3
zi io.6 tO.3
1 'or reg.tive sign on sheer stre:s i:'agNittude indicates direction of shear strcss with respect to X. Y, Z (:ooldiejaC sysLcn.
State of in situ stress. U12e.18 working point Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-5
UJ12e. 18 worki ng poi t
Graphical representation of principal stresses. U12e tunnel complex. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
nlat- 4.2.5.3-6
(
UI~le.010 drift
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrees abcve horizontal
mPa MPa - de;rees below
hori;:nntat
Principal stresses
(+. romnre~q1n n)
S 1 (minimum) +2.4 t0.9 N. 440 W. -20
S 2 (maximum) +8.5 10.5 N. 47" E. -200
S3 (intermediate) +5.6 ±tO.4 N. 420 E. *700
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(+, com.pression)
ax +5.4 ±1.0 East Horizontal
Y +5.2 A0.4 North Horizontal
+ ±6.0 ±0.4 Vertical
1/ Shear.stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate sysTe.-
xy *2.9 t0.5
yz -0.6 ±0.3
zx -0.7 ±0.5
i/eositive or negative sign on shear 3trc!s magnitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X, Y, Z coordinate systcM.
State of in situ stress. U12n.07 drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-7
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrcees ajuve hut izoiE aI IHPd M'Pa - dt|-tc•es I~lou1
ul.ot i .0..,10I
Principal stresses
(+. ennpress ;on)
S1 (minimum) *1.4 10.5 N. 490 W. +220
S2 (maximum) +11.7 10.8 N. 590 E. *37"
S3 (Intermediate) t5.8 t0.4 N. 180 E. -450
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (cast, north, vertical) coordinate system.
(+, compression)
ax *6.4 to. 5 East ilur i zon ta I
y *5.A i0.3 North Horizontal
Z *7.4 t0.3 --- Vertical
.Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system-/
xy *3.5 ±0.3
yz *0.5 tO.2
zx *3.6 tO.8
4ositive or negative sign on shear stress L!.agiitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X, Y, Z coordinate system.
State of in situ stress. U12n.l0 working point. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-8
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrees above hurizoratal
Pa Wei- degrees ielows
Principal stresses
+cjmjre.qs ion)
S (minimum) +5.7 ±0.7 N. 590 W. *500
S2 (maximum) *8.6 A0.4 N. 530 E. *170
S3 'intermediate) *6.2 ±0.4 N. 250 W. -340
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(+, compression)
0x +7.4 ±0.7 East iot i.ontal
oy 16.9 ±0.7 North Horizontal
GZ +6.1 10.4 --- Vertical
1/ Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system
xy *1.1 ±0.4 ......
y z + 0 . 3 1 0 .4 . . .. . .
zx *0.8 ±0.4
-- 4'ositive or negative sign on shear streais Laagnitude itndlcaiei direction of shear str,,s witih respect to X, Y, Z ceordinate system.
State of in situ stress. U12n.1OA working point. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-9
/
(
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrces above 1,13 MPa lihorizon taI
- degrees below ho ri .o:•rt a!
Principal stresses
(+c arm.resston)
S1 (mJnimum) +3.8 ±0.7 N. 2* E. +220
S 2 (maximun) +7.0 ±1.0 N. 840 W. -90
S, (intermediate) *6.1 -t0.7 N. 270 E. -66*
Normal stress components in X, Y. Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(+, conpresslon)
ox t7.0 tl .0 East Hori-zontal
y +4.1 10.7 North Horizontal
0z 65.8 10.6 --- Vertical
Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system!
Ky -0.2 10 .8 ......
yz -0 .8 A0 .5 ......
zx #0.1 W0.6
-A-kosltive or negative slg. on slihat utzess L:agaitude indicates direction of shear strcL.s with respect to X, Y, Z coordina:c systera.
State of in situ stress. Ul2n.lOB structures drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3- 10
K
Graphical representation of principal stress. Ul2n tunnel complex. Rainier Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3-11
SI-2.4 MPd N.440 W. -2"
Sj-b-b NV.. 11.421. .I0' VLIRALA
F1 4
I~d N 49'W 4 226
NV. N 59 t. oil
Sj-!5.8 Wd. N 1,3"t -45-' V1WI ICAL
S,
U11ii. 10 wurl, Ing pointia
HUHI(IIt
S,-3.d NP. N.02"I. #2?'
S,,-j.U NP. N.84"W. -9- NIHIIAl
S,-6.1 NP. 01.211I. -66'
1i1?11 10 Bi -. tructui..' di11l1
HUH III
'AS I
Sj-5.7 NP. N.59'W. *SO"
Sc 8 .6 Nwd N.53'f. t1l'
SI-6.2 Wd. U.25'W. -34'
S31.
tli.?. IOA wormk Ing pl
-LASI
U12ii.01 drift
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrees above
hor izont-aI IPda - degrees below
Principal stresses
S1 (minimu,1) $2.6 ±0.5 N. 620 W. +30
S2 (maximum) $6.6 t0.5 N. 130 E. $860
S, (Inzerniediate) +5.9 t0.4 N. 280 E. -30
Norinal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate syste.-a
(+, compression)
0x +3.3 ±0.4 East HorizontalI
oy +5.2 ±0.4 North Horizontal
0Z +6.6 ±0.5 --- Vertical
Shear stress components in X., Y, Z coordinate system
xy $1.4 ±0.3 ......
yz -0.1 ±0.5
zx W0.2 W0.5 ......
4-aositive or negative sign ot :h-ar iitres L.agnltude indicates directicn of shear stress with respect io X, Y, Z coozdina:e systen.
State of in situ stress. Ul2t.02 SRI alcove. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-12
Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination
+ degrees abuve horizoUtal
MPa MPa - degrees below
Principal, stresses
J±. omress| nn)
S 1 (minimum) t4.3 ±1.0 N. 370 W. .
S2 (maximum) *8.1 ±0.8 N. 330 E. -290
S3 (intermediate) +5.2 10.9 N. 890 E. +45O
Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system
(+, compression)
X *5.6 ±0.8 East Horizontal
oy +6.3 ±0.8 North Hlorizontdl
+ +5.6 ±0.8 --- Vertical
1/ Shear stress ccnponents in X, Y, Z coordinate systemI
x y * 1 .3 ± 0 .5 . . .. . .
Tyz -1.4 ±0.7 --
zx -0.4 ±0.6 ......
1kositive or negative sign on 5hear stre';s ia.g:nitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to
X, Y, Z coordinate sys:em.
State of in situ stress. Ul2t.03 working point. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-13
(
Graphical representation of principal stresses. U12t tunnel complex. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.
plate 4.2.5.3-14
VI 10 I CAL
I . S
SI
%
CASI
1112t.02 SlRI dlcove:
•' '.fj 1411, N. 62"i,. f 3" "%,,ý6.6 141'd N./31°. flib"
SI .S.9 1411a N.281 '. - J"
STRESS (MPa)
E
0
X I.
w a
crH max DIRECTION
E
State of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa. From Haimson, 1983.
plate 4.2.5.3-15
State of in situ stress. U12n and U12g tunnels. Rainier Mesa. From Haimson, 1983.
plate 4.2.5.3-16
DEPTH [i] BELOW LAND o'•. •* WY..?7,4Z.
LOCATION SURFACE [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
U1 2n Tunnel 232 1.0 4.3 5.8
U12n Tunnel 284 2.2 5.2 7.4
U12n Tunnel 300 3.0 5.4 8.2
U12n Tunnel 314 3.6 5.8 6.9
U12n Tunnel 346 3.1 6.3 7.0
U12n Tunnel 364 3.1 6.7 8.7
U12n Tunnel 378 3.0 7.0 9.0
U12n Tunnel 378 4.0 7.0 9.0
Ul 2n Tunnel 380 3.5 7.0 9.0
U12n Tunnel 400 3.4 7.3 9.1
U12n Tunnel 405 3.2 7.5 9.2
U12n Tunnel 410 4.0 7.6 10.7
U12g Tunnel 426 3.0 7.3 7.5
K,
or1 = 8.5 MPa
a2 = 6.8 MPa
O3 = 2.6 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 442m
(
c = 26 bars:
10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - -,,f
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-17
(
10
), 4n, LlJ
i
.1" X:
V)
0
0
or, = 6.6 MPa
O2 = 4.7 MPa
oo = 3.7 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 408m
10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - o-,,/
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12e.06 drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-18
a,: = 37 bars.
10
I
in
u.) 'I)
I.
Twn
0
0
011
or, = 6.9 MPa
(7 2 = 6.0 MPa
o7 = 2.8 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 383m
al1
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - o,,
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12e working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3-19
( (
or, = 28 bars.
10
LU
IU)
0
ol = 8.5 MPa
or2 = 5.6 MPa
a3 = 2.4 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 381m
-or = 24 bars.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - an!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.07 drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate-4.2.5.3.-20
10i
U)•
0
'K
or1 = 11.7 MPa
0"2 = 5.8 MPa
a,: = 14 bars.
ff3 = 1.4 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 3 98m
NOTE: QUESTIONABLE DATA - DO NOT USE WITHIN ZONE OF OPENING INFLUENCE.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - 0"-1
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10 working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
(
plate 4.2.5.3.-21
10
V) V)
uj LU
V)
0a,1
erl = 8.6 MPa
Cr2 = 6.2 MPa
173 = 5.7 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 388m
cr = 57 bars.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,,!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10A working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-22
10
U) U)
iI
U)
0
[
O"1
or, = 7.0 MPa 0,c = 38 bars.
02 = 6.1 MPa
0s = 3.8 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 393m
01
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - an!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10B structures drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.53.-23
10
cc I
(f)
a:
IJL U)
0
< !
(
or, = 6.6 MPa
or2 = 5.9 MPa
o03 = 2.6 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 428m
26 bars.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,,!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12t.02 SRI alcove. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
pla., 4 2.5.3-24
I0
V) LU
V)
LU
0'1 = 8.1 MPa
0'2 = 5.2 MPa
013 = 4.3 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 328m
0"1
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - o,4
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12t.03 working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-25
(
cr = 43 bars.
10
U) U) w IU)
w I U)
0
O'har.min = 1.0 MPa
'ho,..,-, = 5.8 MPa
aver = 4.3 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 232m
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,.t
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-26
a.: = 10 bars.
10
U~)
U-1
0
Crhor.min. = 2.2 MPa
hor.rwx. = 7.4 MPa
o,, = 5.2 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 284m
Grhor .max.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-27
or. = 22 bars.
10
w
U)
0
aora-.,,. = 3.0 MPa
, = 8.2 MPa
o•,. = 5.4 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 300m
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - o-,,f
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n. tunnel. Rainier Mesa. Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3-28
or, = 30 bars.
10
uJ LU
Ill
V)
Lii
rLA
0
!
Ohor.min. = 3.6 MPa
ahor.mo=. = 6.9 MPa
Gtver = 5.8 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 314m
ahor.ma.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - oUnf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-29
or, = 36 bars.
10
0
(I) U/)
FU)r
wi "r" U.,
0
/-
ho,.mn. --- 3.1 MPa
h .,,-,=. --= 7.0 MPa
,,. = 6.3 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 346m
cT, = 31 bars.
ahor.mc=.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - orf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3 -30
10
V
V)
U)
0
6hor.min. = 3.1 MPa
ah.rma. = 8.7 MPa
a, = 6.7 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 364m
10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - o-!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2 5.1-31
/ I
=c = 31 bars.
10
V~)
U)
LU ix
0
0
(
ahor.min. = 3.0 MPa
ahor.moa. = 9.0 MPa
aver = 7.0 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 378m
10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - 0.!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-32
a= = 30 bars.
O0hor.min. - 4.0 MPa
Uhorr.na. = 9.0 MPa
o-,er = 7.0 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 378m
O'h•omam.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - onf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-33
10
UJ U)
X tU)
wr I Li)
0
c'c = 40 bars.
Uho,.mi. = 3.5 MPa
Uho,.,,,. = 9.0 MPa
= 7.0 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 380m
ffhor.u=.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,•!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-34
o, = 35 bars.
10
U') wr I-
0
!
Gho.,min. = 3.4 MPa
chor.ma=. = 9.1 MPa
ctj,, = 7.3 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 400m
Ohor..ai.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - cn!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress, U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-35
(
cc = 34 bars.
10
(J) w a: I
a: w T
0
O'hor.min. = 3.2 MPa
Uhor.maw. = 9.2 MPa
ou,•, = 7.5 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 405m
O'hor.max.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,,f
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-36
( I
o¥ = 32 bars.
10
U) (I) w IU)
w I U)
0
Chor.min. = 4.0 MPa
O'hor..m. = 10.7 MPa
Cuer = 7.6 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 410m
CMr. m=.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - Cnf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.53.-37
or = 40 bars.
10
U) U) Iii
H U)
LU
U)
0
Ohoh...i,. = 3.0 MPa
t•,ý.,.x. = 7-5 MPa
Orver = 7.3 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
DEPTH - 426m
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,,!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3.-38
o'c = 30 bars.
.6
10
LU in
LIU)
LI "1"
0
CLOSURE PRESS -a.
50 II I I I
[bars]
100 ~ i I I I
LE \
LE
0
LE LE
L • 0o OLEO o 0 I\ E 040.
0 'k 0 (c =z "1 o'•. ef f
PORE PRESS - p a
f• WATER TABLE
r"UNDERPRESSURE"; -p = 161m and 547m, 'WINOGRAD AND THORDARSON. 1975.
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Stress Location JDepth c cConditions
100 -
Rainier U12n
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
- hydrofrac
Rainier U12g - hydrofrac
UL12g
U12e.06
U12e
U12n.07
U12n.10
U12n.10A
U12n.IOB
U12t.02
U12t.03
232
284
300
314
346
364
378
378
380
400
405
410
426
442
408
383
381
398
388
393
428
328
10
22
30
38
31
31
30
40
35
34
32
40
30
26
37
28
24
14
57
38
26
43
EXPLANATION:
7 - cc BASED ON HYDROFRACTURE
LE
0 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM
0 a ,c BASED ON OVERCORING
State of in situ stress. Summary. Rainier Mesa and Aqueduct Mesa.
plate 4.2.5.3,39
0 0 o
LE
LE
nLE
nLE
nLE
nLE
LE
nLE
nLE
nLE
LE
nLE
nLE
LE
nLE
nLE
LE
LE
nLE
nLE
nLE
nLE
200._
T
ICL 0U a
300
400
500_
DEPTH
z
EXPLANATION
ON -Fault, known or inferred, "dotted where concealed
"sw°°° "" Existing drill hole
Alluvium 130" -•
V*- Miocene volcanic units
Geology simplified from Scott, R.B. (written commun., 1984)
d(AS of lea
SetI\\ii
116o30,
Map showing location of hydrofracture wells in the area of Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1986.
plate 4.2.5.4-1
0
200
400
-.
600
SCO0 8000
1200
1400
1600 L
STRESS (BARS) 100 200 300 400
NEVADA TEST SITE
USW-G1
\
NORMAL FAULTING
Hydraulic Fracturing Data Principal Stresses
Shut-In Minimum Breakdown Pumping Hydrostatic Pore Horizontal Vertical
Depth, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure,*t Stress Stress m MPa M Pa M Pa MPa MPa MPa* Comments
646 8.3 4.2 ± 0.2
10.2 13.2 13.5
7.2 ± 0.2 9.0 ± 0.2
10.6 + 0.2
6.2
7.9 9.2
10.3
18.8 12.1 ± 0.2 12.0 23.8 14.8 t 0.2 12.8
USW G-1 0.7 4.2 t 0.2 12.9 Minimum horizontal stress from flat
subhydrostatic pumping pressure attained during second cycle. S$ may thus be several bars too high due to pressure gradient in fracture.
2.2 7.2 _t 0.2 15.9 Same as above. 3.6 9.0 ± 0.2 19.2 Same as above. 4.5 10.6 t 0.2 21.4 Minimum horizontal stress from stable
instantaneous shut-in pressures attained in final cycles.
6.3 12.1 - 0.2 25.5 Same as above. 7.0 14.8 - 0.2 27.2 Same as above.
Results of in situ stress determinations in Well USW G-1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4-2
792 945
1038
1218 1288
0 0 '
200 S ',
400 q
- 600
S800
1200
1400
1600 L
STRESS (BARS)
100 200 1 T _
NEVADA TEST SITE
"USW G-2
' \
0
" ,NCPENT
NORMAL FAULTfNG
Hydraulic Fracturing Data Principal Stresses
Shut-In Minimum Breakdown Pumping Hydrostatic Pore Horizontal Vertical
Depth, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure,*t Stress, Stress m MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa* Comments
USW G-2 295 5.1 5.1 + 0.1 2.9 0.0 5.1 + 0.1 6.1 Reopening preexisting fracture of
unknown orientation: shut-in pumping pressure is upper bound on S.
418 5.4 5.4 + 0.1 4.1 0.0 5.4 - 0.1 8.4 Same as above. 432 5.5 5.5 + 0.1 4.2 0.0 5.5 + 0.1 8.7 Same as above.
1026 16.3 11.1 + 0.2 10.1 4.9 11.1 ± 0.2 20.8 Minimum horizontal stress from stable pumping pressure on multiple cycles.
1209 18.2 12.0 + 0.2 11.8 6.7 12.0 - 0.2 25.5 Minimum horizontal stress from flat pumping pressure attained on second cycle. S. thus may be several bars too high due to pressure gradient in fracture.
"Calculated for the appropriate density and depth. tBased on water table at 576 m depth in USW G-I and 526 m depth in USW G-2.
Results of in situ stress determinations in Well USW G-2. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4-3
300 i
400
PAINTBRUSH TUFF
CR '\TER FLAT
TUFF
TRAM MEMBER
LITHIC RIDGE
BEDDED TUFF
Shut-in HydroLogged Breakdown pumping static Pore 2
Hole depth pressure1 pressure pressure pressure Sh Sv 3 T4 SH Comments (m) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars)
G-3 1,074
G-3 1,338
G-3 1,356
79
173
168
68
115
114
105
131
133
31 68+2 206
56 115+2
57 114+2
258
263
13 107+10
59 175+9 Interpretation based on first two cycles only.
64 181+8
Results of in situ stress determinations in Well USW G-3. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1986.
plate 4.2.5.4-4
( /
C/) cr LU I-LLJ
I-a. 0U 0
500
1000
1500
(
Ue-25p# 1
I,
-+ lower bound on Sh
<-0 upper
OSh
bound on Sh
0 SH
.Opp
<(O
Shut-in HydroLogged Breakdown pumping static Pore2
Hole depth pressure' pressure pressure pressure Sh Sv 3 T4 SH Comments (m) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars)
P1 1,564 none1
PI 1,573
Pal 1,693 none 1
153
154
166
115 337+2
116 207+2
128 365+10
353
356
388
Reopening preexisting fracture
41 310+11
Reopening preexisting fracture
plate 4.2.5.4-5
(
0 100
500
1000
COr Cr
lLU
IIW CL
2000
236
337
207
366
1. No clear breakdown pressures seen
Results of in situ stress determinations in Well UE-25p#1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1986.
I?
Results of in situ stress determinations in Well UE-25p#1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1982.
(
Plate 4.2.5.4.-6
-1. = 35 bars.
Ohor.min = 4.2 MPa
PORE PRESS - 0.7 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
ever.
I I I I I
0 .Crha•.min.eff 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - -,,1
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 646 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-7
10
i) (I) U
LU
r
LU
0
(
O',r=12.9 MPa
(
o,,,, = 15.9 MPa
7hor.min = 7.2 MPa
PORE PRESS -2.2 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
o- = 50 bars.
101 4ý = 5 300
w - ¢' V') FAI
ahor.min (7hor.mnin. Crver.eff O'er
0 f - T- I -~~ I I
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS
[MPa)
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 792 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-8
(
o'. = 19.2 MPa -7, 54 bars.
rhor.min = 9.0 MPa
PORE PRESS = 3.6 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
10,.n "• =300
uJ, 450 w- 'V
uJ
U)
0•ro.eff hom.min. Uvei.eff. Crve 0 I - I I -I
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 945 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-9
(
( (
Over = 21.4 MPa
0'hor.min = 10.6 MPa
PORE PRESS -4.5 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
(
a, = 61 bars.
- 10a , • = 300
LU 4 450 I-..
'I) CL
W I
0 hor.min.eff ahor~min. 0ver.eff Uver
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS -an
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 1038 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-10
O'ver = 25.5 MPa
aho,.mi- = 12.1 MPa
PORE PRESS -6.3 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,,f
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 1218 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-11
o,ý = 58 bars.
LU
I
X:
VI -1-
10
07 'ver.eff O'vet
o,., = 27.2 MPa
Uho.min = 14.8 MPa
PORE PRESS -7.0 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
a, = 78 bars.
*-, 10, € =300
m € = 450 F
LU
"0
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS -an
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 1288 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.12
(
Orver = 6.1 MPa a, = 51 bars.
ohom.min = 5.1 MPa
PORE PRESS -0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - a,•
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-2, depth 295 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-13
(
10
V) w Uj
uJI
rY V) rw
If)
0
ove,. = 8.4 MPa
Uhor.min = 5.4 MPa
PORE PRESS -0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
(
o'c = 54 bars.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - an!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-2, depth 418 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-14
(
0
LU W VI)
(n "I(i3
0
C (
0'•e, = 8.7 MPa o-, = 55 bars.
O'hor.min = 5.5 MPa
PORE PRESS -0 (VADOSE ZONE)
ROCK - TUFF
- 0
Ui€ 450 U)
U)
0- c-.
010 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - ,!
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-2, depth 432 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-15
aver = 20.8 MPa o, = 62 bars.
0'hor.min = 11.1 MPa
PORE PRESS -4.9 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - anf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-2, depth 1026 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-16
/
10
U) U) w a:: H U) a: w I U)
0
(
=ver = 25.5 MPa ac = 53 bars.
4ho.min = 12.0 MPa
PORE PRESS -6.7 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
10
, •€ =450 V) UJI
'I w
Xa: Lii
0- hor,.min.ef 1hor.min. aver.eff Uver
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - Unf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-2, depth 1209 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-17
(
UveT = 20.6 MPa -cr = 37 bars.
Ohor.min = 6.8 MPa
PORE PRESS -3.1 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
10
(A / ,,, 450
Ul
I.
0'hor.min. eff rhommin. aver.eff 0rver
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS -a,
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-3, depth 1074 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-18
/ }\,
(
aver = 25.8 MPa
ahor.min = 11.5 MPa
PORE PRESS -5.6 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
( (
aoc = 59 bars.
10
w -6
LU
-rhomm.min.eff rhomnin. Ttver.eff aver
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS -a,,
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-3, depth 1338 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-19
erver 26.3 MPa = 57 bars.
D'ho,.m•n = 11.4 MPa
PORE PRESS -5.7 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
10
(300 V)/ 450 LU
r•
"I- 0
o O7'.mrni.eff hOr•.mn. OUver~efi eveer
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-3, depth 1356 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-20
cr, = 15.1 MPa
O'ho,.min = 7.3 MPa
PORE PRESS -3.4 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
a,: = 39 bars.
10! ,, € =300
S( 450 u) w
I
0 - ahomineff 0rhor.min. 4Tver.eff O wer
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 731 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-21
/
"a,,, = 21.1 MPa
O'hor.min = 11.1 MPa
PORE PRESS -6.1 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
or, = 50 bars.
Ž 10
-Ju•/• "€0 300 n." = 450
U.1 I- '
0 -r 'o.min.eff Orhor.min. Cver.eff |f' I
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - 0nf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 1001 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-22
/
(
01,er = 24.3 MPa
o'ho,.rmin = 12.9 MPa
PORE PRESS -7.3 MPa
ROCK - TUFF
a,: = 56 bars.
10=300
"'€ = 450
I.I -r
Orhor.min.eff Urhor.min. Ohvei.ef f 6
ver
0
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS -n,
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 1131 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-23
(
O'ver = 35.3 MPa
0hor.min = 33.7 MPa
PORE PRESS -11.5 MPa
ROCK - SILURIAN DOLOMITE
a, = 222 bars.
- 10
(30
uj=450 U') £1
w
i')
0-O hor.min.eff a'ver.eff O hor.min.
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS - anf
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 1564 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-24
(
0"ver
U•el = 35.6 MPa a= 91 bars.
O'hov.min = 20.7 MPa
PORE PRESS -11.6 MPa
ROCK - SILURIAN DOLOMITE
-• 10
LU , • =450 (I)
w
0ohref Crhor.,nin. Orver.eff
0 10 20 30
NORMAL STRESS
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 1573 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-25
ffver
O'ver = 38.8 MPa
ahor.min = 36.5 MPa
PORE PRESS -12.8 MPa
ROCK - SILURIAN DOLOMITE
or, = 237 bars.
Chormin.eff O0
ver.eff
20
1
30
NORMAL STRESS - ',,
[MPa]
Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 1693 m. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4.-26
(
10-
ui
LU
uj
I-.
[LU
-r
A.
0
I 10
Im
I I i
10001.0
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME [MINUTES]
EXPLANATION:
H - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT TIME t;
Ho - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT THE START OF A TEST;
A - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR Ho < a,;
B - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR 0 < o- < Ho ; AND
C - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR c, -' 0.
Interpretation key for the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests performed in the Yucca Mountain area.
plate 4.2.5.4.-27
1.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
0
10 1000.01 0.1 1
0 5 10 15 KILOMETERS
0 5 MILES
Location of wells where the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests were performed. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-28
z.
II-
I .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.!
0..
0.:
0.1
0.1
0
10 100 1000 10.000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t) IN SECONDS
100,000
-- Injection-test data for deptn interval from 811 to 1,829 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-1. From Rush et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-29
0 , I T,,,,'I , i i iiimzli i - iT. t I I i, l
66
5
8 06%
7,0 - o. o~*> 50-55 bars
4
3Q 2,,
I
I I I It I I IP. - - -
I.| I I I l'''II
@0.
I I I I
fi = r�
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
010 100 1000 10.000
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS
-- Injection-test data for depth interval from 926 to 1,829 meters.
' 01e'b1I. I ' 'I 18111
O0
I I I 1 Ill
0 0
0 0
0 S 0
0 0
I . a I. . Il. . . . .. . ..... ......... ........ ......... .........
100 1000 10,000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED tt), IN SECONDS
Injection-test data for deoth interval from 1,200 to 1,829 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-I. From Rush et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-30
I I I111lll . I I . IIIf
I I I I I g I
o >50-55
eee0
I I III
ba rs -
100,000
I I I . opt I I
o-, > 50-55 bars
I I1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7 1:.6 ~0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
on
10
I III*
1,000,000100,000
I I [ I ll i i i i i ... . ..
I a ,I I ..I I .l~ I , A I t1|"
I
a i • II . i S . . , ... Alm
j I aIat'' ° I I I I I 1III I 1 1 1 111 M
00" 0 0006 0 0 "1411• ll t I~tS
1.0
0.9
S0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
- 0.3
< 0.2
0- .1 So
. I . . .i f I i * I a ...i
aI I 1 5-55 b ar ans
o~c > 50-55 bars -
I I , I I tII10 100 1000 10,000 100,000 1.000,000
TI:E AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS
-Injection-test data for depth interval from 1,407 to 1.829 meters.
.0 I I a iii ,I; , *, i i i l~ .i ' l , , , , , ,
0.. 1, 1 !1 1 T 11 o
cr > 50-55 bars 8
7
6
S
4
3
2
S !, ,,, .il ,10 , 1 000d I 0 1m00..I I 1 l, 0 100 i000 i•nN ln nn nnn nnn
TTMr AFTEP INJECTION STARTED' (t). IN SECONDSI IUVUUUU
[njection-test data for depth interval from 1,621 to 1,829 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-1. From Rush et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-31
I . I I . off J
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
*t�4
,0
-J I�J - I-J ,.�J
f•
I
0-
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.2
xI 0.1
0
-0.1 1.0 10 00 1000
TIME It), IN MINUIES
-Packer-injection test 3A, depth interval from 649 to 683 meters.
...00. 1.................... ................. 330
2
328
320
324
Packr-ijeciontes
9.deph
iteral
rom1.18
t
Packer-injection test 9, depth interval from 1,118 to 1,152 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
10
TIME 114, IN MINUTES
100 1000
plate 4.2.5.4.-32
c- > 27.5 bars0.
0. 0.
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
.1
N�.
* O 0. i Sc'c > 33 bars
0 0
0 S
0
0
U
! �o.so
4
xi xl �
0.1 1.0
S. . . . . . I. . . . 275
200
100
01
.I
1.V
1.0 10
TIME (t], IN MINUTES100 1,
P'-ker-injection test 10, depth interval from 1,155 to 1,220 metprs.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-33
I-
L.
0.,
Ua - 0.7
• 0.'
S.
U" -.
^ C
b 0 000, Lo , > 20 bars
IS
10
•so
0
, , , , , I, I o , , . . . . . . . i . . . . .t-
0.1
J
4
U
0 4l
• . - .. . . ..I. . .
ac > 47 bars
I I I I 11111 a ........... I I I I lilyI I II I I II I
•*4 - • Ooo°
00
0
0 0 9.
0 0
C I
z
z LL 0
I-
I.
LU
"t
4
00 0 0
I
I4 0 4 LU I C-, -J
4 0
I
a a iI I i a I Ima10
l I I I t ill
100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 1006m - 1220m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-34
1.0
0.9
0.8
August 10, 1981 Packer-injection test 6 Transmissivity = 2.1 x 10-2 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 9.8 x 10-6 meter per day
0
S
0
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
m I I J i n I N . . . . . . ..
11000
I I I I I' I'I
! ! ! ! ! 1! 1 i 4 1 I I 1 11
l I I I l l I !471 (n
iJ u-,.
424 ,J
z 377 _; u-I
uJ
330 "J
w
C
283
235
188 0
141 <
94 X
47 <
0 -I
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
= 0.4
~-0.3
Sz0.2
S0.1
Iz 010 100 1000
TIME AFTE^ INJEC7ION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS10,000 100,000
-- Injection-test data for depth interval from 687 to 697 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-1. From Rush et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-35
' I I'IIl''I I S *I''III I I I |11111 I #I 1113119 I I *IIII
cc = 500m(H2 0) • .85 Q0
0c = 42.5 bars
* or 0
cc = 55Om(H 2 0) •.85 =
. o•c = 46.7 bars
0
I , | lI~l l . I l I I |" I I Ilt ,I • i ilrql , . . ..a
-J
LU
L-J
w
L)J x
I
03
U,= I-.
z
0.1 1 10 100
TIME it) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES1000
TEST INTERVAL 851m - 917m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4.-36
Straight line 550 1 11'" ' I I I I I I t ' 1 - I I
J500 = 240m(H 2 0)
crs = 24 bars S400 -- 4
3 -30
S15.8Q. 15.80io101 t)T = - -"
S 2 00 - As 51.2
= 3 x 10' meter squared per day
z 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 91 1m - 972m.
Straight line S150 11 1 1 1 1' ' 1 1 1' " F1 I I'" ' I I I''1"
U.1 > 500 - c- = 200m(H 2 0) LU -. 1
Cr. - o-, = 20 bars
400 -
Of 300
200 LU. 15.80 15.8(0.10)
z 100 =3 x to-' meter squared per day
LU
TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 972m - 1219m.
Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4.-37
550 LU
uj 500
LU
400
uj 300
0 4
UL 200 LU
LU
z j100
LU x
0.1 1 10 100
TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 1063m - 1124m.
0.1 1 10 100
TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 1126m - 1219m.
1000
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4.-38
0 " 0.01
-A LJ
-J
UJ
Z
LU
I
zJ
LU zu
S00
0 -J -- -o-,:= 175m(H2 0)
,> 400 s > 17.5 bars -u-J
I M 350 zw
. 300
Lw C, 250
(. 9[200 -/
,> >0 0 100
>.O
50
0 F I Ilill| | ! ! . ja lll
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 555m - 604m.
500 , IIIII1| W * 11 ,11 ,1 1 5 I lili|i I i1111
-J 450 -= 210m(H 20)
Uj.J >400 21 bars l.w-l X 350
. < 300
W C, 250
Q'C 200
'C 14.1 150
00 100 =4'a
50
0 I I I iili p I I III I I l imll p I |II III| l l I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 604m - 652m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-39
0.1 1.0 10
TMUl AFTEI[I MUJECTION STAIITD. IN iNU1S
-Packer-injection test for depth interval froa 790 to 796 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-40
0.9
0.8 F
0.71-
*A ý-
0.5 P"
0.4 --
0.3
0.21--
0.11-
ao = 500m(H2 O) .. 5
o-, = 25 bars
or
a, = 550m(H 20) • 0.5
a, = 27.5 bars
•0
0•
l0o
1.0, . I I I I I . I . . F I- I
ON . . . .... . . . . ..... . ... . . . i i
0.6
0.sj-
- *0000. 0
0
00.7 t-
0.51-
0
cc = 500m(H 2 0) . 0.37
cc = 18.5 bars
0
0.51-
0.4
0.3 ý-
0.2 ý-
or
cc = 550m(H 20) 0.37
cc = 20.3 bars a
0.11-
1 .1
0 S
I *� --
1.0 10 1
TIME AFTER INAICTIONt STAITED. IN MIN•IES
-Packer injection test for depth interval from 815 to 834 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al, 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-41
00• . . . . ..... I T I B I B BIB wmR
I
I * I
00 0% 0
1.€
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
a, = 500m(H 20) . 0.35
c-, = 17.5 bars
or
ac = 550m(H 2 0) - 0.35
ac = 19.2
a 90
0
S S
0 0
1.0 10 190
TIeE AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES
•-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 949 to 1,010 meters.
1.0 10 00
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval form 1,015 to 1,033 meters (first test).
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
00
0
**/
0g. • @e00
0.1 100
0 0
0
0
0
0 xo
0
0
0
.0 0
0a, = 500m(H 2 0) 0.42
c = 21 bars
.7 or
. o-, = 550m(H 2 0) • 0.42
".5-/ o = 23 bars
.4 0
0
.3
.2 0
,4.
0.1
plate 4.2.5.4-42
I1000
1.0 10 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STAr1rED. IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 1,052 to 1,219 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-43
1.0
0.$
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
o-, = 500m(H 2 0) 0.45
S d*a = 22.5 bars
or
0-c = 55Om(H 20) 0.45
o-,c = 24.7 bars
/
S
S. . .. I . . . . . . . I 0
•.• .. . . ... . . z i i a i a i z v m i I I I R I
*. . . .. ... - I. . . . ...... ni
0.9
0.3
" • 0.7
" o.s
0.1
0
0.1 1.0 10
TIME (, IN WNUIS
0 0o0 400m(H 20)
0 •/o-: 40 bars
o0@.
00 0.00
00 00
00
00
@ @@0
@o0
0@Q
%
S
0
lo0
-Packer-injection test 3, depth interval from 649 to 683 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-44
'00o
4M
100
01
l.a1 .111
0.7
0.5 - 0.7
So.
0.2
0.1
0
-0.''
xl
we
I
10o
+!
100
6 = 200m(H 20)
• • 0c = 20 bars
Oee
seeee
i*eft
0.1 1, 10 10 100
TIME (ti, IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test 7. depth interval from 835 to 869 meters.
1.0 . . . ..
0.1 1.0 1I0 TIME (ti. IN MINJUTE
I IS
200
I0'
13 ,,o ,,+
10
O0j
1000
Packer-injection test 8, depth interval from 871 to 1,220 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-45
0
... . .I " *' ''... I . . .. I . . .
0.9 6 = 150m(H 20) 0.0 so*a, 15 bars 0 0
0.8 0•00
0.4 •
0,.2 • 0.1 7
0
0.41 - 0 . . 1 ,
I I I
I
z 0
LU
2z: 90
C! <0
?.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
10 100 1000
I f Ii I I 1 1I i I I I I II
May 10, 1981
Packer-injection test 3 Transmissivity = 5.5 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity - 5.4 x 10.1 meter per day 4
*Approximate values
% •rc =96 re(H 20 )
k e'c 9.6 bars
0%
I saw 0 t l i lI n J n~
0=
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL477m. - 579m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4-46
477 v)
429 z
382.
286 Y
239 4
191 L 0
00
48
0
0.5
1.0
0
z 0 U, LU n
z
0 I
LU I
U) _J D cc
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
010 100
I I 1 1111 1 1 I I I I II1 I I I11
-- August 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 10
,- Transmissivity = 9.9 x 10-2 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 2.5 x 10-3 meter per day
--, = 180m(H 2 0)
c-, = 18 bars
%
I I I I ItI Il I I I I ~I t I I I I I I,
100TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 743m - 783m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#l. From Lahoud et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-47
LU
X Y 4J
477 U) cc
429 z
381 J LU
Lu 334 M
238 U
191 > 0
143
UJ
48<
001
1.0 10
TW AFTER INJECTION STARTED 14, IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 792 to 838 meters.
6"
0.0
0,8
0.7
OA
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
' 0 100
1.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 111 I 1 1 1 11l
0.9 - = 180m(H 2 O)
0A - = 18 bars 47
0.7
0.8 5 328
O.S
0.6
0.4 ?/ . 218
0.3 0
0.2 - 109)
0 0
1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED III. IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 802 to 826 meters (first test).
100
Z
I
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley (1984).
plate 4.2.5.4.-48
1I
I 8
4
I I I
I I I lull.II I I I1 I 11 |1I I I |I I | II
cc = 190m(H2 O)
• ~'c = 19 bars
0t "0(
0 I I II I I I I ll• J I I
437
328
5s..I9
-3
U
I I
4
Ir z
L)
x.
4.1
Z 1.0 ' ' ' ' 1 ' l ' '
OD • 0.9
Z 1.0 rc, 1.0(0.03101 Type curve t 1.1311 day per 1440 minutes)
LU 0.7 - for a•=10n= 1.2 meters squared per day Z S 0.6
S. rc W00310)'(10.44 < -.5- c S - a 4 - x 1V" S0.2
>" rez '0.1498)'
LU• _. 0.4
3ý 0.3 0 LU0.
S0.2 E SINGULAR" POINT
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 792m - 850m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.
plate 4.2.5.4.-49
10,000
500 * 111111 1 *, ,,*- 11w I II *, *I , , ,,,,
450
400 - o
2 C 350 "SINGULAR" POINT
. 300
wJ o 250 S:• 0 < 200
< U 150
0 0 100 >-CO
50so
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 652m - 701m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-50
0 -J
U 4 0J "SINGULAR" POINT
I M 350 z UJ
. 300
U. 250
0 < 200 Co
41 LU 150 M >
>00 100
5o
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 703m. - 735m.
500 * I * * mlI * I * 1 * ' ,,,
O J450 -_
w_ > 400 "SINGULAR" POINT I-w
2 M 350
* •300
W (j 250
x :> (J 200
41 L 150
0 0 100
so-m
50
0 1 a I Iliadl aIi a a!11111 1 1 at IIIIII
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 735m - 767m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-51
Soo ! I I IfwllI| I I Itllif| I I I lIl; III I I I [[III I I I fill;
450 -- 0 cUJ
W> 400 "SINGULAR" POINT Wa
W -J 2 W 350 z w
AI. 300
UJ r~j250
• 200
SI150n>
0• 0 100 >'Ca
50 I
0 so
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME. IN MINUTES TEST INTERVAL 783m - 832m.
500 1111t immiii., minimu i m ii .. miim 1,11 1 fi illm
-- 450 c- 0
S400 "SINGULAR" POINT
(C 350 z P~
. 300
W 250
om 200
Ow 150
00 100
50
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 832m - 850m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-52
CC- UJ
S> 400 - "SINGULAR" POINT I.; - 3L0
S0 2350
*� 300
wo ( 250
C0)< 200
C LU 150
00 100so-
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 855m - 873m.
500 I iv1III| I I iiii | I ItIII wI I I vi vo, I I v onui
450 -- o'c "--4 0
(O J 450 - -- + - 4"SINGULAR" POINT LU>400.UJ
LU -J
2 CC 350 LU
- I-< 300 -
wo . 250
Q< 200
w 150 Ix > 00 100 >-CO
50F
0 1 1 A 1 I 1 1 1 J l l ll l I I I I i ll] I tI I 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 873m - 892m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-53
M-UJI uJ > wE-J ZUJ
C*e
e,(
4Cwo
00
Ct)-J
, u) UJ->
"oO
"-IlJ -,
>.
0.1
I1 i l i 10 i il | I I l l| I I l l l
1 10
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 910m - 926m.
100
1000
1000
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-54
1 10
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 892m - 910m.
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0.01
F I I 111111 I lv 111111 I I I I CliFf I F I I 11111 I 5
1 I0 t t
"SINGULAR" POINT
I I I IIII
I I I I III|
I I a Il lid
500
450 S• o~~dc --•O •W
L > 400 "SINGULAR" POINT I-wJ
2 CC 350
z1< 300
uJ wj 250
0 < 200
< IwJ 150
00 100
50
01 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 928m - 1219m.
500 ' .11 11 Illll ' 'I *Il, I iill I *ll * I Ii5
450 -- c 0
UI > 400 - "SINGULAR" POINT I -LU
2 M 350
*( e300
IJ 250
0. 200
SI150 -> 0) 0 100 >-Co
50
0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 1173m - 1192m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et aL., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-55
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 0.0
1 10 1001 10 100
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 1195m - 1219m.
1000
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-56
l-IW
SzJ
w o z L,
LU
00
0.1
I I # I will I IIIIfill I II IIij I III I poI I I I 1111
0-* 0
"SINGULAR" POINT
S iSa il II ll i....i.........i ...... i.. .... .... . .. ..
1i m m mmJmlm E I I i 11111 I I I IIIIII I I I Illll
0.9 I.-
1.0 10 14
TIE AFTER INJ.-CTIN STARTED. IN MINUTES
•Packer-injection test for depth interval from 796 to 815 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-57
V 0
0.g
0.5
0.4 -
0.2 ý-
0.1 ý-
0.1
I.U . - . I . I I __ - I .. . . .. . . .
U.U . . . .... m . . . . .... . . . . . . . ..
"SINGULAR" POINT
0. . . . O . .
0.8 ý-
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2 I-
0.1 F_
-- 1.
1.0 10 1' TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES
-Packer-inJection test for depth interval from 887 to 947 meters.
*1 , • ,, • ',, , , , ,
* "SINGULAR" POIN
0i
. . ., 0 . . . ".Op , ,
1.0 10 1
TM AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 888 to 949 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-58
1.0
IT
0,8 •"SINGULAR" POINT
0.7 S
0.9
Oh•
0.4
0.3
0.2 0.1
0,1
0.3' , , , ,, | , ' O " a ,, A ,,
O.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0 10 1"
TIM AFM I"JCnTCOW STAUr . IN MW4U1U
-Packer injection test for depth interval from 1.033 to 1,052 amters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-59
0.0
0.7
0.8
0.3.
• 'SINGULAR" POINT
0 ~ . . . T • • I . .A .
0.1 ý
0.1
U~
i~ . . .I• ' . . ' . . . I . 331 531
0601
"SINGULAR" POINT -4C
0.4
0.30
02.
00 , 20 a 0 0 , 0 00
0.. . ... . ..... - 0 00
-a.0,1 1.0 10
TIME (1g, IN MINHUJ"S1 1
I Ci 4
I 2
I1iM
-Packer-injection test 2, depth interval from 606 to 640 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4-60
10 TIME (t, IN MINUTES
-- Packer-injection test 5, depth interval from 753 to 787 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-61
1.�I
2
ii
S4
.. 0'.. -- 0
0.7
0. S0.5
0.4 S
0.0
0.2
0.1 0
0 ...
0I0.....
-I 400
30
206
IM0.1 1.0
G.m
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0 I
_z
I-
U,
9.-
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1.0
0.9 I-
0.8 H
0.7 I-
0.6 H
0.4k
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
10 0- Now 10(
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL514m - 579m.
10 100 1000
I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1I1111 1 I 1I 1 1111
May 9, 1981 Packer-injection test 1 Transmissivity = 4.9 x 100 meters squared per day Hydrologic conductivity = 7.6 x 10.2 meter per day
0
"SINGULAR" POINT
I I I I I ..1 .... i ...k i& .LII _ t I I I lI I i
474 U,
LU I-
424
z 329.-j
uJ
Lu
332 -J cu
284
237 '" 9
C,, 190 L 0
142 U.1
95 .-J
47 <
0
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 505m - 579m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-62
II
9--0.5
476 ci cr
429 L z
381 w ELu
333 -J
Lu I
286
238
I
190 > 0
143
95
48 cc U
^0 "
I
Lu
I4 C 4 Lu I C-)
-I
4 C
I
z 0
z
0
i.
LU
75
I
I-
I I I I I I III I I I I I I I II I I I I I II I
May 9, 1981 Packer-injection test 2 Transmissivity = 2.7 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity= 3.6 x 10"2 meter per day
"SINGULAR" POINT
0I
•O
*0.
I I .I I eA.• -- k_,_J l I I Ii I I I I I I II
I I a I I EiIIIIN is a - 8-MIM 0
l
0.5 ý-
1
1.0
I
LU
4 0 4 LU I U -J
4 0
I
z 0
I,-.
LU
LL
0
I,,
U,
-r
0.9
0.8
0.7
0'6 F
0.5
0.4 I
0.3 1
0.2 1
0.1
10 100
I I II I I IIII I I I I ll I I I I I I I
- August 10, 1981 Packer-injection test 7 Transmissivity = 4.9 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 1.1 x 10' meter per day*
*Approximate values
ayc -- 0
"SINGULAR" POINT
1000
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 792m - 1220m.
1.0
z 0
LUI
04
II-
-,<,
Cr.
"I-
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
010 100 1000
477 Y, cc LU I-.
429 z
381 _
LU 334 cc
LU
286 Y
238
191 0
143
LU 95 "
,_J
48
0
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 820m - 860m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-63
475 uV
LU
428
333 -J
285~
238 4
.I
.,,
190 w
143
484
000
I I I 1 11I 1 I F 11111t1 I I I 11I 11
August 11, 1981 Packer-injection test 8
- Transmissivity = 1.3 x 101 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 3.3 x 110' meter per day4
*Approximate values
0
"SINGULAR" POINT
00
0 %
16
I I I t I I I I I
0 L 1
d •
1.0
z
UJZ
U..%
0
LU,,,
""z
'-
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0100 100
-- August 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 9 Transmissivity = 3.9 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 9.9 x 10.1 meter per day
*Approximate values
ac --* 0
"SINGULAR" POINT
aIL t I
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t0, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 779m - 819m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-64
'476 (n 429
z 381
333 -J
286
238 ,
191 > 0
143 <
95 X
48
0J10
A0
z
z 0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
010 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 581m - 621m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
I I I I I I III I I I I I I I |I I 1 I Ir i
August 13, 1961 Packer-injection test 12 Transmissivity = 3.7 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity a 9.2 x 10.1 meter per day 4
_ Approximate values
"SINGULAR" POINT
C. Ielk• J zi ,l I I miaaiI I I Illil1
1000
plate 4.2.5.4.-65
476 Y) cc
42B z
381 -i Lu
333 -J cu
I.
286
238
U,.
190 0
143
96
48
0 0I
0 * * , ,
Hoz 388 meters
07c - 0
0"SINGULAR" POINT (?)
0 S
0
S1 0 0.8
0.7
z 07 0
L 0.6
L& 0 0.5
~Lu 4'1
>IF 0.2
0.1
01
0
0
0
1.0 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, W, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 2, depth interval from 500 to 550 meters.
_A 11
0.1 1.0 to 10D 1000
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 4, depth interval from 600 to 650 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5 4.-66
0.9 a-
S
0
I-_
1000
to cc ILU
z -J uJ LU
-
LU
0
I
- 00~ UJ
I_
I
0
0
0.1
1.0
Iý 0 0.8
Z 0.7 0 I-. - 0.6
LA.
0 o0
0.4
14 -J 0.3
i01 D
0
* 0eO
*0600-+
"SNUAR ON
- • • •0
I, U
En cc I.LU 300
z -LJ LU
LU
I-
.-[200
0
to
U, uJ
0 100
cr,
0
4.
0 >-
-- 0 T 1 . i I I . I I I . I I I . . I I ý i i I l i i . i ý . ýI
0
Ho = 386 meters
0
0
S
LT, - 0
"SINGULAR" POINT
0 0 0 0 0 a
10 I i i10 I I I i 100I& l A1.0 10 1 ;_
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (0, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 12, depth interval from 1,044 to 1,114 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-67
0
0
Ho0= 385 meoers J3 z
0 -J
"SINGULAR" POINT "
00 4 41
o cc
0 -1 1000
S _4
I
1 0 10 100 1000
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 11, depth interval from 974 to 1,044 meters.
0.7
u, 0.6
-JI< 0.3
012 < 04
0.2
0.9s
0,-!i 0o.8
Z 0.7
LL.
01
0
U
.-J< 023
01
0
0
F-
I-
L+ -4 300 Z
z
UJ L-A
<
U,
0 I i.
-J
D 0r
_J
1000
-01 1 01
I
a
. &
a
4 '.1
4 a
U
w I -C I4
a 4
0
0
0
0
0.1 1.0 lo lO 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It). IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 702 to 747 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-68
1.0 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1i ll 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
0.I
0,4
0.7 --*
"SINGULAR" POINT 0.6 -
.4
'.3
.2
.1 C
o I I I II l I I ? ???0re.e * .e.a jili
16"
437
328
21>
109
r . *� *�... .. **....* I I lull
a, -- + 0
"SINGULAR" POINT0
0
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
x
x
0
0 J l
1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t). IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 850 to 875 meters.
I I I I l l
1.4.1 I I I lilly
1.0 10
TIM AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 875 to 899 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-69
0
0
0
434w
327w
218 1
1000.1
E
0
4 *�1
U
4
a
z
0.1
0.8
0.7
0.5
OA3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
U
I I
4 a 4
I I I PhI I
.- c 0
"SINGULAR" POINT0
0
0
0
0
a
0 I I I 1111,. )1 I I I I I
,I , * '. *m I I * , i ll
-- 438
323
213
109
0 1000.1
I I I I.I I I I I I Ia . . . . . w m B A i I
S. . . . . . . i e I I I • g I I ff g I I I I I I I I
S. . . . , • • , . I • I I I I I I
I l I l I m a m,
JIvivrr
6
I I I I I I I I
,c -- 0
"SINGULAR" POINT
0
0
0
0
0.8
0.7
0.4
o.h
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
a
I I I I 1 11I
0
0 I I *�iI 1.11
,a 0
I
1.0 10
TIM AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
"Packer-injection test for depth interval from 899 to 915 meters.
437
z
328
218
=a
4 x
J0 O0
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-70
1.1
0.i
I I I I liii
0
0.1M ....... • . ..........
D e • e l I I II
I,
wE-l
CO
<UJ>
crr
zwL
wo
00
S00
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
5o
0 0.0
................................. i I S * *5I*EI�
I 0.1
1_10
1 10
TIME, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 604m - 652m.
100 1000
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-71
0
*6 0
0 0
0
09
0
0
0
0
0
S 0
0 S
0 0
00*
1.0 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection teat for depth interval from 834 to 895 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-72
U1.0
0.9
0*.
0
0.7 ý,
0.$I-
10.4
0.3 ý-
0.2
0.1
e.0L , ,0.1
00
0
.
II I
. . . !
0.1 1.0 O tOO TIME AFTER INJECTION STAWTT, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 1,015 to 1,033 meters (second test).
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-73
0.9
0.8
0.7 0
0..
0.$
0.4
00
0.3 0
0= 0
0.2
0.1
0•
0.o 0.. .I , , , . . . O .
n+0
0.8
* 400
00.7 -1
0.0 U3002
0.6
9 0N 0M
0- 200
1 0.2 -100
0 *** 0e **00,,0 o
"-0.' . . . . *, i , I . 1, , I s a n |
0.1 1. 01010000
TiME 14, IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test 1, depth interval from 581 to 607 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-74
S~~~............. ..... '.....I... 1...
• •Q •0 *001
0e.
0
1.0
0.9
0.8
C•., 0.7
0.4
0.6
0.4
'x 0.3
0.2
0.1 0
0
0
S 6
0 000
.1 * .110
TIME It). IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test 4, depth interval from 686 to 753 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4.-75
0 0
6 0 0
0.1
W2
400
300
200
100
aONes1.0 100
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.7
- 0.2
" X 0.1
0
0.1 1.0 10
TIME (t), IN MINUTES
.. .me
100
am
I
400
(8
300 U
200
100
ci1000
-Packer-injection test 6. depth interval from 804 to 838 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.
plate 4.2.5.4 -76
*e..
0* I *0.
0°•oo
• , . , , . ,.0. . . . .t . . . .
•UI . . . .... i . . . ... . . . . . .... J l J B J I
10 100TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED Wti, IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 477m - 491m.
1.0
0
U<
>
cZ
th
'UC'
c0
Xw
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
I I I I 1 iI I I itI i I I a a1I
May 11, 1981 Packer-injection test 4 Transmissivity = 6.9 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity =4.9 x 10- meter per day
? 0
%% #gol* 0•
0 le•
0el
S. OS.t
0l
0e
10 100 100
473 Uv cc UJ I.
426 u z
379 .J LU
331 1J
284~
237 I-U,
189w 0
142 4
95 -. J
47 <
0
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 491m - 505m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-77
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0
0
Fz
1-. 0 U,
c
0. >'"
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.5
uJ
LU
z U> 4I
I I I I III, I I t1II1II I I 11 1I
- May 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 5 Transmissivity = 1.7 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 1.2 x 10"Y meter per day
%S Sl%
I I I I l till I ".P gibeq I I I I
477 V) Occ
429w z
382 -i
o
w
334 -J
U
239
191 0
143
48
,0
PU
0.1
0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
010 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 703m - 743m.
1C
, i' | ! I I I II I I11 1 I I I 11 1
- August 13, 1961 Packer-injection test 11
- Transmiuivity =1.8 x 10.1 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity =4.6 x 10.1 meter Per day
o0
m • 0 \ D 0
0m
0 0w
I I 1 I I | I I I I I I I.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#l. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-78
I
LU
II.4 C 4 LU I 0
-a 4 0
I
z 0
I.0 0-
476
429
381
333
286
238
191
143
-95
48
0 ]00
C",
z
Lu -i
'I, r,,
LUJ
w
I-,
.-1
4 Q1
u U I I i I I . .. . . .I I . I
August 13, 1981 Packer-injection test 13 Transrnissivity = 1.4 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 3.5 x 10-1 meter per day
z
0
z U.
05 D-
I.
LU
I-
10 100 10C
1.0
A U
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 504m - 544m.
10 100J
1 00
476 v) eJ LU
428 z
381 -f UJ
333 UJ
286
238
190 L 0
143
<U 95 I
C-,
48 4
0
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED Qt), IN MINUTES
TEST INTERVAL 621m - 661m.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-79
0.9 I-
u u , , u u I
0.8 F_
0.7 -
0.6 F-
0.5 1-
0.4 h
0.3
0.2 I- S
i miamI m5m . a mmmii
- go
0.1
1.0
I
LU
I
4 0 4 LU I C-) -J
4 0
I
0
IL
0 LJ .z
'a
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
I I I fill11 I I I 11I1 I I I I!
- August 13, 1981 Packer-injection test 14
- Transmiseivity =2.1 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 5.3 x 10"2 meter per day
1 6.
S?
%'o.
iiiiall I °ioL..ukI I I n i i1110
w I I I I I I ? 477 Y)~ tU
429 z
381 Uj
w LU
33W LU
286
CO)
14
LU 191
143 0
0 !
.A1
S C Ho- 388 meters
0
S
0
6
0
0
X10 0.0
Z 07
•I-•
-,-l<l _Yio
JI-C 0.
>-- 0.2
0.1
0 0 S
* 0
1+0 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, WI, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 5, depth interval from 640 to 690 meters.
HO = 389 meters0
S
S
a
0
0 9
0 0
0 00 0 *
1.0 to 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, 1t0, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 3, depth interval from 550 to 600 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-80
0.9 0 * * See.
0
-01 0.1
0.9 S
0 In
UJ
300 Z
_z -J
I-,<
-200 3:
I-
I.
0
LU
J
"Cr
0
Z 0.7
S0.5 04
X<i_
1•< 0:3 I
-Ja 0.2
:040
0
0.1
I'
3W I-l
z
-J
_J -J
2W
I
I-.
S0
-Jo1 <
U
-'J
01 >
1000
U1^1.
I
CLU
UJ4
U2
2'
D4
0.1 1.0 10 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (I, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 8, depth interval from 764 to 834 meters.
I I I I I I I ' I I , , , I,
S S.
0Ho= 386 meters0•
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
I -�
nU
ILU
z
-S LU
I
200
LU
, 100
" "0 >
"4 LU [i
01 1.0 10 100 1000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 9, depth interval from 834 to 904 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-81
1 .0 ' I . . .
03- 000
O0.8 S S Ho= 388 meters
S0-7 0
£0.6 S
0
-0.1
LU c
UJ
z
_J
cc
UJ 2-
LU
I-
200
to
LU
x
I'
U 0 "
cc
0
0 *0
1.0
0.9
i 0 0.8
Z 0.7 0
LU 0.1
04
U'
0.3 4I
.0t
* 4 ,
1.0 10 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It(, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 6, 'lepth interval from 690 to 740 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-82
0.9 00.* *** 0
0.8 S0 Ho= 37 rnmeors
O07 -
0.6
0 0.4
-J 4 .3
'us
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
.0
1000
(1) Cc
LU 30
La z
-J
2w
U,
-J La
I
I
Co
D
0
I00
100
,-I
0 >"I
1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (0, IN METERS
Packer-injection test 15, depth interval from 1,297
100
to 1,308 meters.
O0 g
• O S5mtr
0
0
1.0 10 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN METERS
Packer-injection test 16, depth interval from 1,297 to 1,337 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-83
1.
0.
z 0 o.
I
0 . I0.
x )0.
D
'(<0.
>Iu
-0.0.1
0.9 F-
.0j . . ... I ' ',' ' ,'' '' { . . ... I * . . .
.8 ••Ho . 366 meters 7 - 1) I "
F 0
66
4
3S
2 5
0 Of 0
I ''* * .* ' I I ,,, A,,,,I , , ,, , . iI , ,,,,,
_z
..J -~i
Lu
-J Lu
0
1 Y
_
cc
0
1004
0 0.8
x
00.7
. 0.6
~LA_ i0
4 0.5 0 0.4
S 0.3 U
0.
0.1
0
Ui
LU
I-
z
40
200 "I'..,
X
0 > "1 "
-01 L 0.1
I . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
-I . I I T 7_7
0.o9- Ho- 37 mews U),
z
IQD0.7- I --L
U.U
01 200
0.0 wZ 06'-LU
05~0 icn
x 0.2 4 LU
Do 0
x
0.11
I . 0 ,•
0 >
-01*
0.1 10 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 17, depth interval from 1 ,341 to 1,.381 meters.
1.0
0.9- Ho 367motorsU
* LUJ
•'r i •00•
X0 0. -30 LU
0.7 -. S0.8- -LU
U _J
Oe 2W00
0.0
LU 0.4 t5
0< LU.J1
ccE 100<
>_0 .10
0 >
0.
Packer-injection test 18, depth interval from 1,381 to 1,421 meters
Results of the Cooper- Breclehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-84
1,0t I I I 1 I I I
Ho 357 mews
X II M 0 . 8 -4 3 0
0.7 1- w
0Z 0.6
0.5
~~Jo
1004
4 0 .0-_ TIME AFE NETO TRTD tI IUE
• 10
t !00
10 0.28- 0 00
iZ 0.6 l
100
I0.8- * 30o
_ >w
-I-0
=1•°o..,.. -=,-00
Ze0.6t- C ig 0 < .0. <cnI-. 0-
0
z- • 02-- w.
0 -t
-- 0 1 4 I l i ' ; , I •
0' 10 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, ItI, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 20, deoth interval from 1,463 to 1 ,509 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredlehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-85
0.9• Ho= 367 meters
=z z 0o.7 - • ,
0 200
00.3 CC~- x2004<
°I- " -o
cc 4
0 U
> 0.1 l' 0
0.1 to 10
TIME AIFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 21, depth interval from 1,509 to 1,555 meters.
o.9.- Ho -38 meters
~u,6u
0.84 300
12 0.7- L . i > Sw
n I _J
0 -i 200 <
0.5 30 Si U)
U LU
=u 0 >
S0.2- .
S~z•L
-01"I 0 0 -010
01 1.0 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, 1. IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 22, deoth interval from 1,558 to 1,805 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-86
¶0 094- Ho=36Omeiers i
0.7-- U
LU LO0.- •LU
<0- -30cc
9 -z
z 1
0 1I
-0 1
01* 1.001
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 24, depth interval from 1,597 to 1,643 meters.
1.0..
0.9- Ho- 367 motors
U,
0 ?
ZD 0.'
U .
-0<
01100
0.2
Z 017
0 -0 01- 0 0 - 0 >"
01 0 ' 0
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 23, depth interval from 1,554 to 1,600 meters.
Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-87
1.01
HO =369 meters
LU
0.8 -- 300
2 Z
0.7- S
LU
wL 0.6
10 -2004
0.5
0.4
-J >
lo ,,• 100 •
X , 02- L
i UJr >- 0.1
0'- 0 0-0 >" x
-0 1 01 10 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 25, depth interval from 1,646 to 1,805 meters.
10. II
0.9- Ho 368 meters .
LU SI°o8 . 0 t
~0.8 * 300~
zS Z 0.7-- • u,
Uu
-J
<. -I
L--
01' 0-200
TIEAFE NJCIN TRTD 4 NMIUE
'- er-i0 0
2-r
zU 0.L
0.3 01
02C
0'- * o >
-0.1 01 10 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (t), IN MINUTES
Dacker-injection test 26, depth interval from 1,643 to 1,689 meters.
Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests In Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-88
1.0 0L /O3811r 0.9 Ho. 3W motors
x ? 0.7
,z 0 6
LL.
0 • 0 "
0.2 " >_ 0.1
0 - -0
0.1 -o 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 27, depth interval from 1,689 to 1,735 meters
10
09- Ho 368 neters
zz UJ
ULU
,0 0-200
x 0.4
0.3- 0 X 100u
0 2
z ~ 02-LU4
00
•01
0 4:
0-- oO -- 0 >"
-01 01 10 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (fl, IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test 28, depth interval from 1 ,735 to 1 ,781 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-89
l.�rI I I
as O-
x 0.8
z S0.7
UJ
z 05.
0.4
S 0.3
X 0.2
0.
0
-0.1
0
S 0
0 0
Ho = 368 meters
0
0
0 0
Un
z -J U,
UJ
F
I
a,
0 Co 100
4 w
-J
cc
0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (W, IN METERS
Packer-injection test 29, depth interval from 1,783 to 1,805 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-90
I I I I I i i i • I i I I ] I I i I I . . . . . . .
I-
I-
N 4
e
I 4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.0 70
TIME AFTER INACTION STARTM (a. IN MINUTES
0 0
0 0
((H 1111111 I I I 111117
•Packer-injection test for depth interval from 698 to 722 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-91
436
327 j;
211
o
IJI 1 | I I , . , ,l I I I I I I I If I I I . . . . . . .
Q . . . . . .... . . . . ..... . . A i g L B I
0.1
S.
S.
S.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0. 0.:
S
.7
1,1 1 1 1| 111 1 . .I ISI1,•
0.1 1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It). IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 615 to 655 meters.
1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED III. IN MINUTES
1I
100
437
215
109
0
644
43 _z
218
109
Packer-injection test for depth interval from 655 to 701 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-92
.4 - %
.3 C
0 I 1 I I 1 til I I 1 1 II 1 1 1 I_ 0 1 1 -1_I111
IU
4 a 4 z
'a
X
I. I I I 1111]1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I III I 1 I I I rii
I..
0.7
1.0
40
0.4
0.1 0
II I
0 I I I I 111 1L I I 111 11 J *? e• 446j.~J-|. . I I !111
m g I I g I I I I I ! ! I I I el
1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES
Packer-injection test for depth 722 to 747 meters.
1.0 I45
0.9
0.8 436
0.7 0
0
0.8 327
0.5 0
0.4 218
0.3 0
0.2 109
0 0,1 0
0.10
0 00 *A-11 I II III ~ 1 . I I I0.1 1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (I). IN MINUTES
100
I a
5!
"-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 747 to 792 meters.
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4.-93
x 0
4
I a(0
4
4 a
'.V
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
I
(.0
4 a 4 I
I I I Jill! II Fill I I I I I III1 1 f I I III
0
00
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0I I I 11111,
644
437
I 328
218
100
1 0 00
interval from
0.1
I a a
U'
I U
4
4 a 4 I
I
I IU
w 4 a 4
13 •
0I i i i Il a I I J I I l I I I 1 A .I I I 1I1
I
| I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITI
0.1 1.0 10 100
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t3. IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 802 to 826 meters (second test).
10__
0.
0.
0.
0.4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.1 1.0 10
TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t. IN MINUTES
-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 826 to 850 meters.
437
I 2
218
00
Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-94
U
w II4 a 4
].i 1| I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II l
0.S
0.8
0,7 a
C
0.6 a 229
OA4• 162
0.3
0.2 is
0.
o.1 0
04 0 a J l I 152I ~ . .I I I
I U
I 4 a 4
- i i I I i ii i f i f i i ii i i 1 i i
9
ee
e
4 a
.3
.2 -
S .
ae
0I I 0 I I J J I I [ I ~ e - I I l I I
I
I
I
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
Stress Borehole Depth o- C Conditions
G-1 646 35 LE G-1 792 50 nLE G-1 945 54 LE G-1 1038 61 nLE G-1 1218 58 LE G-1 1288 78 nLE
G-2 295 51 nLE G-2 418 54 nLE G-2 432 55 nLE G-2 1026 62 nLE G-2 1209 53 LE
G-3 1074 37 LE G-3 1338 59 LE G-3 1356 57 LE
UE-25p#1 731 39 LE UE-25p#1 1001 50 LE UE-25p#1 1131 56 LE UE-25p#1 1564 222 nLE UE-25p#1 1573 91 nLE UE-25p#1 1693 237 nLE
SLUG TESTSII- I
"SINGULAR" POINTS
Borehole Depth o c
USW H-3 1 792
Borehole Depth o- c
USW H-1 692 42.5
USW H-3 884 25 USW H-3 941 24 USW H-3 1093 20 USW H-3 1172 33
USW H-4 579 17.5 USW H-4 628 21
USW H-5 793 27.5 USW H-5 823 20 USW H-5 979 19 USW H-5 1024 23 USW H-5 1135 25
USW H-6 666 40 USW H-6 852 20 USW H-6 1045 15
UE-25b#1 528 9.6 UE-25b#1 763 18
USW G-4 815 19 USW G-4 814 18
652 703 735 783 832 855 873 892 910 928 1173 1195
796 887 888
1033
USW H-6 606 USW H-6 753
UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1
UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1
USW G-4 USW G-4 USW G-4
514 505 792 820 779 581
550 600 974 1044
702 850 875
0
State of in situ stress. Summary. Yucca Mountain.
Plate 4.2.5.4.-95
USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4
USW H-5 USW H-5 USW H-5 USW H-5
. - . -
I I I I I100 CLOSURE PRESS-•
II [bars]
0
0
PORE PRESS - p
A&
A
A&
AA
LE
A0
ALE
DEPTH
2
AA
A
LE At
00
fjWATER TABLE
"OVERPRESSURE"; -p = 20-55m ROBISON, 1984 AND ROBISON et al., 1988.
(/ Ap, =?
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
LE 0,oe LE \
LE
LE/ /
EXPLANAT!ON:
* - o•, BASED ON HYDROFRACTURE
LE /- "LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM"
A - o-, BASED ON SLUG TESTS
State of in situ stress. Summary. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-96
0
0 �1
500 -
1000-
0
1500
E
I-
Lu
222
237
PI .2 T30 1W 25'
WTUGEXM.ANATIOFA US'w -2 129.4ALLUVIUM
: QUATEANA
100
= 52"30" - - :73.5 "IOW numb.
SCONTOUR-
i~~~~i' w•2 •I R )olf Aur"
bflfude Of 00
Smetrl s urted c, : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to 111ii ii!i46isii- 51
Montors &Wter S -W- PmENTwI. S
Dattiume of PC
1-~~~~t25 WYM Pieteste
t?:.!.... 7274 otrs •is
USWUS WG--4•
,7729.3
: :!i: • • UUE$ W5
729.3)
36e470' •0" '
~ \7310.4
o 1 2 3 KILOMETERS
o 1 2 MILES
Location map for in situ stress cross-sections. Yucca Mountain. Modified from Robison, 1984.
plate 4.2.5.4-97
S..... .. M.o
(
'L-
2000
1000 _
7
z 0
w
-J
0
-1000
* sp • sp
* LE-50 SP LE-p
* LE-56
U*) (n) ::3 n
I I I II
.10 I LE-35 sp
sp J sp 1.42 1 nLE-50 / 18 I" l 08
1 19 sp I osp sp _L sp I LE-54
> 47
*nLE-222
* nLE-91
* nLE-237
I -r nLE-61
"- - I I LE-58
S I I . nLE-78 I I I II I I I I I
53
EXPLANATION:
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING LE-60 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, a, [bars]; nLE-70 - NO LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, a,, [bars];
INJECTION TESTS I18 - a. [bars]; SP - SINGULAR POINT a• - 0;
- CLOSURE PRESSURE; * - OVERPRESSURE.
2 3 4
In situ stress field NW-SE cross-section. Yucca Mountain.
-1000
5 DISTANCE [miles]
plate 4.2.5.4.-98
(I)
GROUND SURFACE
WATER TABLE
LO)
"4ý wU
24
. LE-39
-0
•nLE -51
•nLE -54
nLE -55
*nLE -62
,nLE -53
0 I
2000
- 1000
E z 0
F
._J
- - - - - __ - _1 - -
I I _L
I,
*rr
Ln :3 Z)
ý0 4
2000
1000
z 0
wl -Jl
VATER TABLE
SP
sp
LE-50 sp
Sp - LE-56
nLE-222
nLE-91
nLE-237
II
II II
.17 sp. .21 -SPI .S1 .25 .20 sp .24 I .19
.Sp I..23
.sp LE-37 22 .sp
.sp 22 I .25
., ..L .33 L
kLE-59
S A.LE-57
S-• •EXPLANATION:
-4 4
y,t)
. sp
.> 27
.40
.p
.20
.15
.> 33
.> 20
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING LE-60 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, o, [bars]; nLE-70 - NO LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, c', [bars];
INJECTION TESTS 18 - cr [bars); SP - SINGULAR POINT 0; -- 0;
- CLOSURE PRESSURE; * - OVERPRESSURE.
I I I I 1 0 1 2 3 4
41z
LU Z)
-- 1000
DISTANCE [miles]
In situ stress field. W-E cross-section. Yucca Mountain.
plate 4.2.5.4-99
GROUND SURFACE
0 - *
-1000 -
- LE-39
24
2000
- 1000
E
z 0
..J -Jl
- 0
OPM2
U20416UE2O@ Utg' UEI906
VE2Of* OPMI ammmUýOdSL2CU
Ug'at *4
,.,No
,Oui1aN
PPSPS*Ci IS RIDGE
POO, n*
K25110 CRATE*
UE1700-
C 0 -ILL.S,0
eU125e3
J134"9419'
0 ill
SMULL
#4CV&AO TEST SITE
NFCI
of S*S -
q�.
N
9 'P 0 I S U
it Mm.,,
1P T "I UWAAT12
Location of wells in which temperature measurements were made. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
plate 4.3.2.-l
*
*
e UE190ce.. -
13'. IS
*UE4s
TWE eTWS
1,.
4 4
ua&-O,W0$ '0O_ A" C CcOT E a -. 0,'
0 TWF *Oup.T&,,#S
0 S
-- LOP
Temperature (deg C) 30 50 70 90 i10 130
Composite temperature profile, Pahute Mesa. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
plate 4.3.2.-2
10
U) L
�1) E
�4�)
cv
/
TemperaLure (deg 20 30
C)40
Composite temperature profile for Rainier Mesa and environments. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
1800
400
(I) L ci)
ci) E
-c �4�)
ci)
800
1200
1600
,/ !
ýIt- A ý ') I
(
5 IS
0
200
400
608
800
1000-
TemperaLure (deg C) 25 35
Composite temperature profile for Yucca Flat area. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
plate 4.3.2.-4
45 55
L 'I)
ci) E
(-.
4)
TemperaLure (deg C) is 25 35
0
I d
17c
16d
200
17 17a
L 400 S~16f
E klI 16d
-c -4• 600
17a
800
1000 I
(
4S
Composite plot of temperatures below 100 m, Syncline Ridge area. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
,ý.A I )
J
TemperaLure 40
ill W3
4w8r TW4
I
Composite temperature profile for the southern NTS. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
plate 4.3.2.-6
20 18
3060 I. I
TW5
(deg 5s
C)
20088
70
{/) L 4)
-4J)
4I) E
-c 4) in
6088-
8100-
10808
TWF
1200
60
J '
!
&
emperc 35
,ire (deg 45
VH- I
5001r
UE 25o3
Ký% USW GI
USW HI
Temperatures in wells deeper than 600 m, Yucca Mountain. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.
plate 4.3.2.-7
I25
C)55 65
(I) L
El
�4�)
0
B0ef-
J-13
15001-
aL1 AI4
S15 8
I I I
a | I
Temp. OC Average Approximate Value of General Location Well No. at depth Yearly Geothermal Grad.
of 500m Temp. °C 0 C/km
PM-1 28 =r 15 26
PM-2 51 = 15 72
UE-20f 24 = 15 18
Pahute Mesa. UE-20j 35 z 15 40
U-209 33 = 15 36
UE-19gs 31 = 15 32
U20-el 32 = 15 34
TWE 42 = 16 52
UE-18t 40 = 16 48
HAGE 22 = 16 12
U12s 22 = 16 12
Rainier Mesa- TW-7 22 = 16 12
Yucca Flat- UE-4a 26 = 16 20 Syncline Ridge. -TWB 25 = 16 18
U3cn4 29 = 16 26
UE-179 30 = 16 28
UE-16b 27 = 16 22
TWI 22 = 16 12
TWF 47 = 20 54
TW3 35 =20 30
Southern NTS Jll 35 = 20 30
TW4 25 = 20 10
1W10 26 = 20 12
UE-25a3 37 17 40
VH-1 37 z17 40
Yucca Mountain. J-13 31 17 28
UE-25al 33 17 32
USW G-1 29 17 24
Downhole in situ temperatures at a depth of 500 m, Nevada Test Site.
Plate 4.3.2.-8
wl
PM2(s5)°°Z U20el (32)
* U20q (33 )
* UE20J(35) .Jo UE19qs(31) "1
'\U E20f (24)pM 1(28)
RTZ BLACK MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN ' PAHUTE MESA
UE186 (40) 0
TIMBER MOUNTAIN
U12s (22) OAK SPRING
I . 0 BUTTE
HA-9 F2 2-Jl j .DQL
U E16b (27)
U3Cn4(29) MINE 0
PINNACLES RIOGE1
PROW PASS ;
LjWC31(29) 3E25a3(37) SUE25alI *••
CRATER I g(33 )K WAI4MG •.,TE• •, JI3(31) • wts ~
VHI (37) Y! @ VOLCANIC • JACKASS
FLAT FLATS
J11(35)
SKULL
.• NEVAA TEST SECTER
LATNAOPWELL RANGE
CP HILLS
6
NwE
CENTER
rWF (47) 0
, IS 2,0 =,5 30 MILES
SI' 0 15 2,0 25 30 KLOMETERS
Distribution of in situ temperature at the Nevada Test Site at a depth of 500 m.
plate 4.3.2.-9
HELEN
Z
0 nI-
-qi I ii II I ii II I ii 'I I
37*
30
fl[