Programme of measures in the Júcar Hydrological District: case of Mancha
Oriental groundwater bodyJavier Ferrer Polo
Júcar River Basin Authority
GALICIA
PRINCIPADO DEASTURIAS
CANTABRIA
PAISVASCO
NAVARRA
ARAGON
CATALUÑA
VALENCIACASTILLA-LA MANCHA
MADRID
EXTREMADURA
ANDALUCIA
MURCIA
BALEARES
CANARIAS
LA RIOJA
CEUTA
MELILLA
CASTILLA-LEON
Júcar
1. Júcar River Basin
2. Programme of Measures of WFD
3. The case of Mancha Oriental groundwater body
• current situation
• cost - effectiveness analysis (cea)
• objectives and time exemptions. technical viability
INDEX
JÚCAR RIVER BASIN
GALICIA
PRINCIPADO DEASTURIAS
CANTABRIA
PAISVASCO
NAVARRA
ARAGON
CATALUÑA
VALENCIACASTILLA-LA MANCHA
MADRID
EXTREMADURA
ANDALUCIA
MURCIA
BALEARES
LA RIOJA
CEUTA
CASTILLA-LEON
Júcar
Surface (km2) 43.000
Permanent Population (2005)
4.792.528
Equivalent total population (2005)
5.153.288
Irrigation surface 2005 (ha) 352.489
Water demand 2005 (hm3/year)
3.290
Total demand per use
77%
17%
6%
0%0% Agricultura
Urban
Industrial
Livestock
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVESENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES
WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
ACHIEVE THE GOOD STATUS OF SURFACE AND GROUNDWATERS IN 2015
ACHIEVE THE GOOD STATUS OF SURFACE ACHIEVE THE GOOD STATUS OF SURFACE AND GROUNDWATERS IN 2015AND GROUNDWATERS IN 2015
ELABORATION OF A PROGRAMME OF MEASURES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RIVER BASIN MANAGMENT PLANS
ELABORATION OF A PROGRAMME OF MEASURES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RIVER BASIN MANAGMENT PLANS
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES (art.4)(art. 4.1.)
IMPROVEMENTS CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED IN PHASES EXCEEDING THE TIMESCALE, FOR REASONS OF TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
IMPROVEMENTS CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED IN PHASES EXCEEDING THE TIMESCALE, FOR REASONS OF TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
THE DEADLINES MAY BE EXTENDED
(TIME EXEMPTIONS)
THE DEADLINES MAY BE EXTENDED
(TIME EXEMPTIONS)
NATURAL CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW TIMELY IMPROVEMENT IN THE STATUS OF THE BODY OF WATER
NATURAL CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW TIMELY IMPROVEMENT IN THE STATUS OF THE BODY OF WATER
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE TIMESCALE WOULD BE DISPROPORTIONATELY EXPENSIVE
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE TIMESCALE WOULD BE DISPROPORTIONATELY EXPENSIVE
(art. 4.4.)
PROGRAMME of MEASURES WFD
CLASSIFICATION OF MEASURES:
Basic Measures others directives:
Basic Measures Water Framework Directive:WFD (Directive 2000/60/EC):•Irrigation modernisation (art.47 RPH)
Supplementary Measures:•Resources increase (art.60 RPH)
Programme of Measures
Cost‐effective combination of
measures
PROGRAMME of MEASURES WFD
Description of the current draft of the PoM
Type of Measure Investment Mill.€
Nºmeasure
s
Demands (DEM) 2.773 304
Quality (QUAL) 2.957 451
Extreme Phenomena(E.Phe)
1.171 40
Governance (G) 20 15
TOTAL 6.921 810
PROGRAMME of MEASURES WFD
Groundwater Body 080.129 Mancha Oriental
Surface: 7.286 km2
CURRENT SITUATION
580
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
may
-72
may
-74
may
-76
may
-78
may
-80
may
-82
may
-84
may
-86
may
-88
may
-90
may
-92
may
-94
may
-96
may
-98
may
-00
may
-02
may
-04
may
-06
may
-08
Nive
l (m
snm
)
08.29.036 (T.M. Albacete)
Piezometric levels evolution
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
Important relationshipriver-aquifer
-100-50
050
100150200250300350400450500
1940
/41
1942
/43
1944
/45
1946
/47
1948
/49
1950
/51
1952
/53
1954
/55
1956
/57
1958
/59
1960
/61
1962
/63
1964
/65
1966
/67
1968
/69
1970
/71
1972
/73
1974
/75
1976
/77
1978
/79
1980
/81
1982
/83
1984
/85
1986
/87
1988
/89
1990
/91
1992
/93
1994
/95
1996
/97
1998
/99
2000
/01
2002
/03
2004
/05
2006
/07
año
hm3
Aforado Restituido Detracción
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
oct
nov
dic
ene
feb
mar ab
r
may ju
n jul
ago
sep
Gan
anci
as-P
érdi
das
(hm
3/m
es)
aH 04-05 aH 05-06 aH 06-07 aH 07-08
Picazo – Los Frailes Los Frailes – El Molinar
CURRENT SITUATION
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
Need to limit extractions and ensure sustainability to the aquifer and its exploitation
MINIMUMHm3/year
MAX.Hm3/year
RENEWABLE RES. 286 330
AVAILABLE RES. 236 300
RESOURCES AND DEMAND ESTIMATION:Hm3/year
AGRICULTURAL DEM. 392
URBAN DEMAND 20TOTAL WATER DEMAND 412
OBJECTIVE: EXPLOITATION INDEX ≤ 1(EXTRACTIONS ≤AVAILABLE RESOURCE)
CURRENT SITUATION
Need to reduce the range of incertidumbre
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
GAP Hm3/year
MiN MAX
RENEWABLE 82 126
AVAILABLE 112 176
GAP ESTIMATION:
MEASURES CHARACTERISATION
* Prices update 2008
Measure Gap reduction (hm³/year)
Cost inv. * (Mill. €)
Cost O&M* (Mill. €/año)
Ongoing measures
Supply Pumping Substitution PHASE I Finalised 31,4 2,2
Irrigation modernisation and consolidation 7 28,8 2
Irrigation Pumping SubstitutionPHASE I 33 8,9 0,1
TOTAL ONGOING MEASURES 40 69,1 4,3
Foreseen measures
Supply Pumping Substitution PHASE II 9 82,9 1,1
Irrigation Pumping SubstitutionPHASE II 47 103,6
2,21M€/(hm3/year)1,2
Works on piezometry and hydrometry measures Indirect effect 1,1
TOTAL FORESEEN MEASURES 56 187,6 2,4
TOTAL ONGOING AND FORESEEN MEAS. 96 256,7 6,7
CURRENT SITUATION
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
GAP tendency scenario WITH measures: 16-80 hm3/year
PROPOSED MEASURES
MEASURES ON DEMAND: WATER RIGHT ACQUISITION (WRA)
Cost WRA (2008): 0,25 €/m3
MEASURES ON OFFER: IRRIGATION PUMPING SUBSTITUTION PHASE III (PS III)Cost PS: 2,21 million € / (hm3/year)
CROP TYPEHERBACEOUS WOODY
SOCIAL COST WRA TEMPORARY PERMANENT
SURFACE WRA 2007 - HIGHVOLUME WRA 2008 - LOW
CURRENT SITUATION
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
0 3 6 9 12 15 km
0 3 6 9 12 15 km
Image 14 August 2005
Image 22 August 2008
Effect of Water Rights Acquisition in 2008 for summer crops
Better relationship river-aquifer-80-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
0102030405060
oct
nov
dic
ene
feb
mar ab
rm
ay jun jul
ago
sep
Gan
anci
as-P
érdi
das
(hm
3)
aH 04-05 aH 05-06 aH 06-07 aH 07-08
Picazo – Los Frailes(Monthly Accumulated)
CURRENT SITUATION
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
Budget: 12.7 million €Volume: 50.6 hm3
COST -EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS (CEA)
• NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) AND DISCOUNT RATE (r)A lifespan of 50 years has been considered for PS III works
WRA
For discount rates lower than 13%, the measure on offer is the optimal according to NPV
The measure of pumping substitution Phase III is adopted as optimal from the Cost – Effectiveness point of view
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
OBJECTIVES AND TIME EXEMPTIONS. TECHNICAL VIABILITY
Discount rate of 4%Cost per m3 is evaluated depending on resource availability, assuming a design capacity for pumping substitution of 20, 40 y 80 hm3/year respectively
AvailableHm3/year
5 10 15 20 30 40 60 80GAPHm3/year
20 WRA WRA/PS IIIa
PS IIIa PS IIIa
40 WRA WRAWRA WRA/PS
IIIb PS IIIb PS IIIb
80 WRA ADC WRA WRA WRA WRA/PS IIIc
PS IIIc PS IIIc
RESULTS MATRIXWater resources availability
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
From the technical point of view the following are considered viable:
•All ongoing and foreseen measures, the start date of which is before 2015
•Water rights acquisition measures
Nevertheless, the development and start-up of the phase III pumping substitution works will be conditioned to surface hydrological resources availability.
Surface hydrological resources availability depends, in time, of the implementation degree of measures of:
- New infrastructures management- Reservoir system management improvement- Irrigation modernisation
OBJECTIVES AND TIME EXEMPTIONS. TECHNICAL VIABILITY
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
OBJECTIVES :2015: Extractions <= renewable resource (Avoid additional deterioration of water body)
2021 (at least): Extractions <= available resource, (Piezometric levels recuperation)New measures: PSIII
OBJECTIVES AND TIME EXEMPTIONS. TECHNICAL VIABILITY
MANCHA ORIENTAL GROUNDWATER BODY
GAP Hm3/year
MIN MAX
RENEWABLE -14 30
AVAILABLE 16 80
GAP ESTIMATION FOR 2015With ongoing and foreseen measures:
• Mancha Oriental GWB is in bad quantitative status
• Measures currently ongoing by administrations will allow piezometric balance in 2015, adapting extractions to renewable resources
• Reaching environmental objectives requires additional measures: CEA selects offer management measures (PS) and regarding demand (WRA)
• The start-up of PS III obligates, due to technical viability, to postpone objectives compliance, at least, until 2021
• The decision of postponing the objectives compliance to 2021 or 2027 requires an additional analysis of Administrations budgetary capacity.
CONCLUSIONS
Thank you for your attention
Top Related