Fortuny - 559 MODIF. SALA 112 SAB 12.00

21
CARDIOACTUALIDAD: LO MÁS RELEVANTE DE LA CARDIOLOGÍA EUROPEA Y MUNDIAL EN EL ÚLTIMO AÑO CARDIOPATÍA ISQUEMICA Dra. Magda Heras ICT, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona Congreso Nacional Enfermedades CV Barcelona, Octubre 2009

description

Dra. Magda Heras Congreso Nacional Enfermedades CV Barcelona, Octubre 2009 CARDIOACTUALIDAD: LO MÁS RELEVANTE DE LA CARDIOLOGÍA EUROPEA Y MUNDIAL EN EL ÚLTIMO AÑO ICT, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona • GSK (beca no condicionada) • Menarini (Consultoría) • AstraZeneca (Coordinación estudio) Conflictos de interés: • SÍNDROME CORONARIO AGUDO • PREVENCIÓN SECUNDARIA

Transcript of Fortuny - 559 MODIF. SALA 112 SAB 12.00

CARDIOACTUALIDAD: LO MÁS RELEVANTEDE LA CARDIOLOGÍA EUROPEA Y MUNDIAL

EN EL ÚLTIMO AÑO

CARDIOPATÍA ISQUEMICA

Dra. Magda HerasICT, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona

Congreso Nacional Enfermedades CVBarcelona, Octubre 2009

Conflictos de interés:

• GSK (beca no condicionada)• Menarini (Consultoría)• AstraZeneca (Coordinación estudio)

• SÍNDROME CORONARIO AGUDO

• PREVENCIÓN SECUNDARIA

PLATO Study Design

Primary endpoint: • CV death + MI + Stroke Key secondary: • CV death + MI + Stroke in patients intended for invasive management • Total mortality + MI + Stroke • CV death + MI + Stroke + recurrent ischaemia + TIA + arterial thrombotic events • MI alone / CV death alone / Stroke alone / Total mortalityPrimary safety: • Total major bleeding

6–12 month exposure

ClopidogrelIf pre-treated, no additional loading dose;if naive, standard 300 mg loading dose,

then 75 mg qd maintenance;(additional 300 mg allowed pre PCI)

Ticagrelor180 mg loading dose, then

90 mg bid maintenance;(additional 90 mg pre-PCI)

UA/NSTEMI (moderate-to-high risk) STEMI (if primary PCI)All receiving ASA; clopidogrel-treated or naive;

randomised within 24 hours of index event (N=18,624)

James S, et al. Am Heart J. 2009;157:599-605. 4

TICAGRELOR IN ACS. THE PLATO STUDY

All Patients*All Patients*Ticagrelor Ticagrelor (n=9,333)(n=9,333)

Clopidogrel Clopidogrel (n=9,291)(n=9,291)

HR for ticagrelor HR for ticagrelor (95% CI)(95% CI) PP value value✝✝

Primary Objective, n (%/yr)

CV death + MI + stroke 864 (9.8) 1,014 (11.7) 0.84 (0.77-0.92) 0.0003Secondary Objectives, n Secondary Objectives, n (%/yr)(%/yr)

Total death + MI + stroke 901 (10.2) 1,065 (12.3) 0.84 (0.77-0.92) 0.0001

CV death + MI + stroke + severe + recurrent ischemia

+ TIA + arterial thrombus1,290 (14.6) 1,456 (16.7) 0.88 (0.81-0.95) 0.0006

MI 504 (5.8) 593 (6.9) 0.84 (0.75-0.95) 0.0045CV death 353 (4.0) 442 (5.1) 0.79 (0.69-0.91) 0.0013

Stroke 125 (1.5) 106 (1.3) 1.17 (0.91-1.52) 0.2249

Total Death 399 (4.5) 506 (5.9) 0.78 (0.69-0.89) 0.0003

Hierarchical Testing of Major Efficacy EndpointsHierarchical Testing of Major Efficacy Endpoints

Wallentin L, et al. New Engl J Med. 2009;361.

No. at risk

ClopidogrelTicagrelor

9,2919,333

8,5218,628

8,3628,460

8,124

Days after randomisation

6,7436,743

5,0965,161

4,0474,147

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

121110

9876543210

13

Cum

ulat

ive

inci

denc

e (%

)9.8

11.7

8,219

Clopidogrel

Ticagrelor

K-M = Kaplan-Meier; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval

Wallentin L, et al. New Engl J Med. 2009;361.6

TICAGRELOR IN ACS. THE PLATO STUDY

Death, MI or Stroke

p=0.0003HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.92)

RRR = 16%, ARR = 1.87%, NNT = 54

Mehta S, et al ESC 2009, Hot Line

CLOPIDOGREL IN ACS. THE CURRENT STUDY

Mehta S, et al ESC 2009, Hot Line

PRASUGREL IN STEMI. THE TRITON – TIMI 38 STUDY

Montalescot G et al. Lancet 2009; 373: 723–31

PRASUGREL IN STEMI. THE TRITON – TIMI 38 STUDY

Montalescot G et al. Lancet 2009; 373: 723–31

Death, MI, stroke Death, MI, urgent TVR

Stent thrombosis TIMI major bleeding, non-CABG related

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Death,MI,RIUR,BO Death, MI Major bleeding

Early eptifibatide Early placebo

% p

ts

96 h 30 d 120 h

P=0.02

P=0.08

GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in NSTEMIThe EARLY-ACS study

Giugliano et al. NEJM 2009; 360: 2176-90Giugliano et al. NEJM 2009; 360: 2176-90

• Routine early eptifibatide vs provisional use after angiography (decision by MD)• High risk: troponins, ST changes, >60 y. Randomization < 24h. Angio 8-12h• UFH 35%, LMWH 53%, both 7%, other 6%. Clopidogrel before angio 75%• 59% PCI, 13% CABG, 28% medical therapy. 37% provisional arm eptifibatide

OTAMIXABAN IN NSTEMI. THE SEPIA-ACS 1 STUDY

Sabatine M. ESC 2009 [ figura REC 2009;62:1149-60]

GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in STEMI . The BRAVE-3 study

800 pts with AMI ≤ 24hASA, heparin, 600 mg clopidogrel. Abciximab vs placebo before pPCI1º end-point: Infarct size (SPECT) 2º: Death+AMI+TVR+stroke 30 d.

02468

1012141618

Infarct size 30 ddeath,MI,Rev,stroke

Abciximab Placebo

% p

ts No differences in major bleeding

Mehilli J, et al. Circulation 2009;119: 1933-40

ROUTINE PCI AFTER FIBRINOLYSIS IN STEMI The TRANSFER study

1059 pts with high risk AMI ≤ 12h, in non-PCI centresASA, TNK, heparin, clopidogrel (recom). Randomized early routine PCI ≤ 6h (99%) vs standard treatment (1/3 required urgent PCI)1º end-point: Death+AMI+ Rec isch+ CHF, shock 30 d.

Cantor WJ, et al. NEJM 2009;360: 2705-18

02468

1012141618

Prim end-point Rec isch CHF

Standard Tt Early PCI

P=0.004

P=0.003P=0.04

RR 0.64 0.09 0.54

% p

ts

PRIMARY PCI VS FIBRINOLYSIS IN STEMI IN THE ELDERLY. The TRIANA study

266 pts with AMI > 75 yrs, admitted to active pPCI (23 centres) Randomized to pPCI vs TNK ASA, heparin, clopidogrel (recom). 1º end-point: Death+AMI+ stroke 30 d.

Bueno H, et al ESC 2009, Hot Line

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Death,AMI,CVA Death AMI CVA

pPCI Fibrinolysis

OR 1.31 (0.67-2.56) P = 0.43

OR 1.60 (0.60-4.25) P = 0.35

OR 4.03 (0.44-36.5)P = 0.18

OR 1.46 (0.81-2.61) P = 0.21

• SÍNDROME CORONARIO AGUDO

• PREVENCIÓN SECUNDARIA

N= 3.491

N= 2.730N= 761

Mega JL, et al. Lancet 2009; 374: 29-38

RIVAROXABAN IN SECONDARY PREVENTION. THE ATLAS STUDY

RIVAROXABAN IN SECONDARY PREVENTION. THE ATLAS STUDY

Mega JL, et al. Lancet 2009; 374: 29-38

BLEEDING

2 EFFICACY

5,5

3,9

1 EFFICACY

5,6

7,0

Apixaban 2,5 HR 1,78, NSApixaban 10 HR 2,45, p=0,005

BLEEDINGISTH MAJOR, CR NON-MAJOR

Apixaban 2,5 HR 0,73, NSApixaban 10 HR 0,61, p=0,07

EFFICACYDEATH, MI, REC ISCH, STROKE

APIXABAN IN SECONDARY PREVENTION. THE APPRAISE STUDY

Appraise Investigators. Circulation 2009; 119: 2877- 85

CR: Clinically relevant

THROMBIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST SCH 530348THE TRA-PCI STUDY

Becker RC, et al Lancet 2009; 373: 919-28

CONCLUSIONES

SCA• Nuevos fármacos antiagregantes, prasugrel y ticagrelor • El traslado para ICP tras fibrinolíticos reduce los eventos• Estudio TRIANA: la ICPp es > fibrinolisis en pacientes >75 a;

no provoca exceso de hemorragias

PREVENCIÓN SECUNDARIA• Nuevos tratamientos antiplaquetarios (inhibidor receptor trombina) y anticoagulantes orales (inhibidores FXa)